Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama replaces Andrew Jackson on the $20 Bill
TheTownCrier ^ | April 29, 2010 | TheTownCrier

Posted on 04/29/2010 10:24:32 AM PDT by AuntB

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

The State of Arizona passed a law to uphold federal law and to protect their citizens but the liberal DC establishment, instead of supporting the right of Arizona to enact the legislation is acting full bore against them.

First, let’s get the media and open border politician's spin corrected.

There is nothing in the Arizona law contrary to Federal Law. The State of Arizona is acting in concert and protection of the the US Constitution and law.

Today, an article in David Horowitz’s blog describes it.

“ Tragically, the very powers that are Constitutionally supposed to protect America from foreign invasion are lined up to ruin her. It is already a felony to be in this country illegally, but the federal government, from the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and now Barack Obama, have obstinately refused to protect and secure our borders.”

It’s not the first time a president and his regime of these United States sided against a sovereign state, refusing to enforce federal law.

It’s not the first time a president acted outside of federal authority to distribute to his supporters the wealth and property of other Americans. Like Andrew Jackson, Obama the Democrat, is seeking his place at the bottom of the presidential history heap by disregarding the rule of law.

The question is, will the State of Arizona survive and and be allowed to protect it’s citizens, it’s culture, it's history, it’s laws.

Law, Law understood, and Law executed

This is the simple principle adopted by the Cherokee Nation, located in the NE corner within the State of Georgia, by 1819.

First was the Law. Then law must be understood by the people being ruled by it. But with no execution the law is empty and invites anarchy. When it becomes so complicated, no one understands it.

Seems simple enough, right? Not when special interests are regarded above the rule of law.

These Cherokee, many of them the half breed off spring of Scottish immigrants who fought for the Revolution, and members of the Ridge Party, named for Cherokee leader Major Ridge, had a Constitution copied after our US. Constitution, a legislature and courts. They were prosperous, Christian, independent, modern, and relied on nothing from the Federal government for their care. They had a Newspaper, the Cherokee Phoenix, distributed world wide, in the Queen’s English as well as the Cherokee Language. They named their children after founding fathers they regarded with the utmost respect: James Madison Bell, Benjamin Franklin Adair, and so on.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Home of Elias (Buck Watee) Boudinot, editor of the Cherokee Phoenix, c. 1830, New Echota, Cherokee Nation.

After his election, Jackson pushed and signed the Indian Removal Act into law in 1830. The Act authorized the President to negotiate treaties to buy tribal lands in the east in exchange for lands further west, outside of existing U.S. state borders.

While not popular in the North, and opposed by Americans like Congressman David Crockett and Ralph Waldo Emerson , Jackson’s Indian Removal Act was popular in the South, where population growth and the discovery of gold on Cherokee land had increased pressure for removal of the Cherokee. The state of Georgia became involved in a contentious jurisdictional dispute with the Cherokees, culminating in the 1832 U.S. Supreme Court decision Worcester v. Georgia, which ruled that Georgia could not impose its laws upon Cherokee tribal lands.

Their own New England educated Cherokee attorneys fought and won the decision in the Supreme Court, which held the Cherokee Nation was indeed a ‘sovereign state’, who, as long as they held to Constitutional guidelines of federal law, could not be invaded or removed.

Jackson is often quoted regarding this decision, as having said, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!"

Of course, Jackson knew the Supreme Court has no power of enforcement; he as the top executive is responsible for that. He refused. Jackson was the ‘people’s president’, or so it’s said, representing American pioneers of simple means in the South and the movement west. The citizens of Georgia, aided by their Militia, continued to move into modern, European styled Cherokee homes and productive plantations unimpeded by the Federal government. Those who objected, white and Cherokee within their territory, were jailed or killed.

The rule of law was ignored in favor of lining the pockets of the people who put Jackson in office and invaded the Cherokee Nation. The result was the forced removal on the ‘Trail of Tears’ of tens of thousands of Cherokee, other tribes, slaves and the white men who stood with them.

The Cherokee State was cleansed in favor of the invaders and stands as a stark historical reminder of the fragility of any state sovereignty.

No, there is no formal movement to replace Jackson with Obama on the $20 bill, that we know of. But there is a concerted effort by Obama and his squatter support squad of liberal socialists, some of them republicans, to destroy the right of any state to protect its citizens from invasion.

History does indeed repeat itself, if we allow it. Where will the good people of Arizona or any state, of all races, go if they are not allowed to enforce their laws?

_____________________________________

"All Nations have their rises & their falls. This has been the case with us.

Within the orbit the U. States move the States & within these we move in a little circle, dependent on the great center.

We may live this way fifty years and then we shall by Natural Causes merge in & mingle with the U. States.......

Cherokee blood, if not destroyed, will win its courses in beings of fair complexions, who will read that their ancestors became civilized under the frowns of misfortune & the causes of their enemies." -

John Ridge , son of Major Ridge, letter to Albert Gallatin, member of Thomas Jefferson's staff - February 27, 1826

_________________


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Government; History
KEYWORDS: aliens; andrewjackson; arizona; auntb; battleofneworleans; illegalaliens; immigration; indians; invasion; johnnyhorton; nativeamerican; obama; oldhickory; propertyrights; reconquista; sovereignty; thetowncrier
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: pissant

“Just out of curiosity, how do you think Old Hickory would handle the illegal aliens invading out nation?”

LOL. Now that thought puts a smile on my face, cause I know the illegals would no longer be in the country.


41 posted on 04/29/2010 4:13:31 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pissant

A.) Beck’s NOT an idiot, though sometimes you can’t actually PROVE that; and

B.) YOU are not addressing the substance of my post; which means:

C.) YOU LOSE.

Sorry, but thanks for (not) playing.


42 posted on 04/29/2010 4:22:27 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

A.) Beck’s NOT an idiot, though sometimes you can’t actually PROVE that; and

B.) YOU are not addressing the substance of my post; which means:

C.) YOU LOSE.

Sorry, but thanks for (not) playing.


43 posted on 04/29/2010 4:23:05 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

You want to argue TR sometime, I’m game. He was quite the patriot and effective President. Like all Presidents, he had his shortcomings and moments of stupidity. But basing TR’s career evaluation on his boneheaded BullMoose years (all two of them) as Beck likes to do, is as much a disservice to TR as basing Churchill’s career on his mistakes (Which including joining Labour, amongst other things).


44 posted on 04/29/2010 4:35:13 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

45 posted on 04/29/2010 4:54:59 PM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I could care less about his “Bullmoose” years. I base my loathing for him on the Interstate Commerce Commission, the “Trust Busters” and all the other ways he grew government and government regulation of business when he WAS in office. Now, granted there may have been some abuses by a few businesses, but I would far rather have had THAT than the strangling tentacles of big government, which is what TR was spinning during his Whitehouse years.


46 posted on 04/29/2010 5:42:18 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

“The question is, will the State of Arizona survive and and be allowed to protect it’s citizens, it’s culture, it’s history, it’s laws.”

It won’t if Obama and his GOP Treason Lobby comrades have any say in it.


47 posted on 04/29/2010 6:07:38 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Jackson definately had his many flaws. Unlike Zero, he really knew who our enemies were!


48 posted on 04/29/2010 9:34:27 PM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

So busting up AT&T’s monopoly was a bad thing?


49 posted on 04/30/2010 9:09:16 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When was it busted up? I don’t recall the year, but it was in the 80’s after the MCI lawsuit. Had nothing to do with Teddy “big government” Roosevelt.


50 posted on 04/30/2010 9:29:51 AM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

That’s true. It was During Reagan’s time. To foster competition instead of monopolies. That is also what Roosevelt was known for. Though progressive old Teddy did far fewer than ‘conservative’ Taft.


51 posted on 04/30/2010 9:52:26 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson