Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Baby in the White House?
Leibowitz's Canticle ^ | May 1, 2010 | Leibowitz

Posted on 05/01/2010 9:07:36 PM PDT by Bob Leibowitz

Anyone else notice that Mrs. Obama appears to be with child?


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: health; obama; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2010 9:07:36 PM PDT by Bob Leibowitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
"Anyone else notice that Mrs. Obama appears to be with child?"

That's her husband.

2 posted on 05/01/2010 9:08:54 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

If Michelle is preggers it is the longest gestation known to man. She’s looked pregnant since before the election.


3 posted on 05/01/2010 9:09:03 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Couldn’t be more of a baby than the Tyrant in Chief.

And he’s supposedly been with another woman of late, according to teh ever-reliable National Enquirer.

Are you sure Michelle’s healthy eating isn’t just making her fat?


4 posted on 05/01/2010 9:10:21 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Whoa! Is it already time for the Obama’s to make thier sacrifice to the god of abortion politics?


5 posted on 05/01/2010 9:12:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

I have heard talk.

Others said she eats children


6 posted on 05/01/2010 9:15:41 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

A baby in the WH? Must be Kal’s.


7 posted on 05/01/2010 9:15:51 PM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

I’m sure Obama doesn’t want to see Michelle “punished with a baby.”


8 posted on 05/01/2010 9:17:27 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack; stylecouncilor

LOL


9 posted on 05/01/2010 9:23:35 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

“Anyone else notice that Mrs. Obama appears to be with child?”

I’ve noticed that it looks like she’s carrying triplets in her butt!


10 posted on 05/01/2010 9:24:19 PM PDT by Batman11 (Sarah Palin: "Illegal immigrants are called illegal for a reason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Bob, Michelle is 46 years old. I went to your blog and your only other line was, “just in time for the election.”

I realize you’re a guy, hopefully, with a name like Bob. For goodness sakes, if you’ve been paying attention, she always had the same figure type. That’s how she’s built.

There’s been speculation that Michelle is pregnant since 0bama was elected. Puhleeze!


11 posted on 05/01/2010 9:25:12 PM PDT by mplsconservative (0bama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

If it is true, there’s a risk of a Down’s baby. Neither of them is all that young. Politics aside, having kids that late is irresponsible, especially with the demands placed on any family living in the White House.


12 posted on 05/01/2010 9:25:26 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Hmm, how will this fit in with his “affair”????


13 posted on 05/01/2010 9:27:18 PM PDT by blondee123 (Illinois ELECT Adam Kinzinger - http://www.electadam.com/ rid US of communism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Beer through my nose you bastard!


14 posted on 05/01/2010 9:27:29 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

Women have children later these days, fairly routinely. I think she’s expecting.


15 posted on 05/01/2010 9:27:47 PM PDT by Bob Leibowitz (Response, Free Republic, news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Who’s baby is it?


16 posted on 05/01/2010 9:28:02 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"Is it already time for the Obama’s to make thier sacrifice to the god of abortion politics?"

Hussein, "No one should require the burden of a baby on anyone."

yitbos

17 posted on 05/01/2010 9:29:47 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

18 posted on 05/01/2010 9:29:53 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Euuuueeeww


19 posted on 05/01/2010 9:31:18 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Is it Charlie Rangels’?


20 posted on 05/01/2010 9:32:55 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Oh come on, she’s had hundreds of pictures with Barack in the White House already.


21 posted on 05/01/2010 9:35:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Is Barry punishing Michelle? ... These are sick, wicked people.


22 posted on 05/01/2010 9:36:29 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

“...having kids that late is irresponsible”

Their business, not ours.


23 posted on 05/01/2010 9:43:21 PM PDT by Habibi ("It is vain to do with more what can be done with less." - William of Occam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

nah... she just big boned


24 posted on 05/01/2010 9:43:58 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Yeah, 41 pounds 5 ounces of concentrated lipids and triglycerides from Lobster and Fillet Mignon on the taxpayer`s dole.


25 posted on 05/01/2010 9:44:56 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Does that mean the kid’ll be an American citizen?


26 posted on 05/01/2010 9:48:38 PM PDT by Erasmus (The Last of the Bohicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
Women have children later these days, fairly routinely. I think she’s expecting.

I'm one of those 'have them later women', but I was 36, not 46. Michelle doesn't look any different these days than she has since the resident in chief took over, sorry. False meme speculation is like talking about the fat lady next door. Is it real or is it Memorex?

27 posted on 05/01/2010 9:49:53 PM PDT by mplsconservative (0bama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

I wonder if John Edwards might be the father????


28 posted on 05/01/2010 9:54:32 PM PDT by fish hawk (Dreaming in my flight, I fly beyond my dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
That's her husband.

HAH! Perfect.

29 posted on 05/01/2010 10:03:27 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Remember the father in 'Rosmary's Baby? Same guy.
30 posted on 05/01/2010 10:10:32 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

I was born to 44 yr old mother in the early 70’s. Her first doctor suggested she should abort me for that reason.


31 posted on 05/01/2010 10:22:16 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? (STATE CONTROLLED ECONOMIES SUCK ! LONG LIVE AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
No kidding. She'd have to be giving birth to an elephant. I can see the headline now: Shocking shocker!!!! Michelle Obama pregnant with Babar's love calf!!!!
32 posted on 05/01/2010 10:24:36 PM PDT by JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

LOL Hilarous.


33 posted on 05/01/2010 10:51:03 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

You think she’s expecting

I expect you’re not thinking...


34 posted on 05/01/2010 11:19:34 PM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
The incidents of birth defects at ANY AGE is rare. The idea of being irresponsible to have a child later in life is foolish and selfish. What would be better a quiet abortion? As a man who has had two children after 39 and hope to have at least one more with my wife, soon to be 39, and as the brother of TWO siblings born to my mother after the age of 42, I find your attitude repulsive and idiotic. !
35 posted on 05/01/2010 11:20:05 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

If so, approval ratings increase a point or two.


36 posted on 05/01/2010 11:51:06 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

No, what would be better is to not get pregnant in the first place. Regardless of your opinion, the risk for birth defects rises noticeably after 40, particularly for women. As for foolish and selfish, how selfish do you have to be to have a kid so late in life that you’ll have plenty of time to teach her to drive, since you’ll be retired? That you’ll have to catch the daybus from the “independent living center” to see your kid graduate from college?


37 posted on 05/02/2010 12:46:18 AM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Isn’t she a little old to have a child?


38 posted on 05/02/2010 12:48:28 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
People are more than able to raise children over the age of forty. besides the fact that IT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS! Even with the higher risk, the risk is extremely low. Regardless, the fact is that a special needs child is certainly not the end of the World and is often a greater blessing than can be imagined.

As far as selfish is concerned, nothing is more selfish than choosing the one or two child family because you want the new BMW, bigger house in the burbs, and expensive vacations than the privilege of raising a responsible, tax paying, and stable future generation to help pay for not only my own future needs but for those of society as a whole.

The reason the country is in the trouble that it is is because all the wrong people are having all the children. We can not continue to leave the raising of large families to unwed, uneducated women in the ghetto. The middle and upper middle classes MUST have more children if our society is to survive and thrive.

39 posted on 05/02/2010 1:09:26 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
It's those re-fried beans

Turn up the speakers.

40 posted on 05/02/2010 2:11:15 AM PDT by Hillbillary (I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

I have never met a person who said, “I wish I had been killed in the womb because my mother was over forty.”


41 posted on 05/02/2010 2:24:01 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bgill

>>A baby in the WH? Must be Kal’s.<<

Yeah, he’s too busy screwing all of us.


42 posted on 05/02/2010 3:25:36 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Who’s baby is it?

I've heard rumors that it isn't hers.

43 posted on 05/02/2010 3:32:31 AM PDT by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Father would have to be Chewbacca. Wookies tend to stay with their own kind.


44 posted on 05/02/2010 4:12:15 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Women are having babies later these days, but 46 would be pushing it. Not to say it couldn’t happen.


45 posted on 05/02/2010 6:56:50 AM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

too many vegetables


46 posted on 05/02/2010 6:58:29 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

Under the new health care mandate, if I was to get pregnant at age 46, I’ll just bet the govt. would make it THEIR business and decide what treatments I would be allowed to have as well as my baby if it happens to be born with Downs Syndrome or any other birth defect.


47 posted on 05/02/2010 6:58:48 AM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; Jim from C-Town

I never said anyone should have an abortion. I said when people get to that age, they need to think about the risks, not just to the kid, but the mother as well, and about what it means to the kid to be born to older parents. It’s not about limiting kids so you can have an expensive lifestyle, it’s about trying not to have kids so late in life that you end up being unable to participate fully as they get older. I’m 39 myself, and my wife is pregnant (she’s 31). We want to have at least 2 more. One of the things I have to think about is how old I’ll be at various milestones in their lives. At this point, when the youngest is ready to drive (assuming we have our kids as close together as possible, with the youngest born sometime in 2013), I’ll be near 60. When she graduates college with her bachelor’s, I’ll be 65. If she gets married when she’s in her late 20s, I’ll be past 70. That’s really pushing it. I’m not going to be able to enjoy her triumphs nearly as much as I would if I were even 10 years younger, and she’s not going to have me around nearly as long.

And Jim, it’s just as much my “business” as my opinions are your “business”. You need to get off your high horse, and realize that this board is about the exchange of opinion and information. You can’t just shout down people whose opinions differ from yours; that’s the DU way, not the FR way.


48 posted on 05/02/2010 9:06:30 AM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
I happen to be able to see "both sides" of this age issue.

OTOH, the Obamas aren't ordinary people. I'm positive they would have NO PROBLEM with an abortion given they are Pro-Choice.

Michelle will have early advanced testing done and if the baby has Downs, they'll likely say she suffered a "miscarriage".

sw

49 posted on 05/02/2010 9:18:53 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Also, it would seem that, despite the risk of a child of older parents having birth defects being “very low” as you put it, it was still high enough to affect your family. You’re awfully defensive for someone who says special needs children are “often a blessing”. If you take that kind of attitude, it’s very easy for people to interpret it as a lot more like someone who feels guilty about something and is trying to justify their decision, rather than someone who genuinely believes that.

I don’t think anyone disagrees that the middle-class and upper-class birthrates are very low, compared to the rates for those in “the ghetto”, and that as time goes on, the demographics of the country are going to change because of it. However, by saying that “the wrong people” are having kids, it sure sounds to me like you don’t think they should be allowed to have kids at all. Now who’s the one talking about things that are none of their business? Are you going to be the one to tell them they should start aborting their kids? Are you going to push for legislation to require that people on welfare not have children, or even be required to have vasectomies or tubal ligations in order to get their checks? If you want the middle class to have more kids, that’s fine, but the key is to make sure their kids are all going to be capable of productively contributing to society. That means encouraging them to start having kids younger, instead of waiting until after they have the expensive car, big house, and high-paying job.


50 posted on 05/02/2010 10:43:17 AM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson