Skip to comments.Why Is Kagan's Personal Story Off Limits?
Posted on 05/14/2010 9:36:46 AM PDT by CaroleL
When Justice Sonia Sotomayor was nominated last year for her current position on the US Supreme Court, the Obama administration put the focus squarely on her personal story. But now in the case of Elena Kagan, the president and his team are attempting to prevent the latest nominee's personal story from reaching the American public.
(Excerpt) Read more at talkingsides.com ...
Because she is a Lesbian
That doesn’t even begin to show up on the radar of what matters. I’m a lot more concerned with her stance on things like free speech.
The lesbian thing is a distraction.
All these friends covering for Kagan saying she dated men in college sound an awful lot like “some of my best friends are black.” And if she did, so what? I hear tell that a majority of homosexuals have experience with the opposite sex.
In my experience, any woman I’ve met who looks like her doesn’t prefer men.
Media bows to Obama.
Because Obama said so, so shutup and obey. What is with these media types, they elect a dictator then bother us with silly questions.
Like she and obama have a lot in common?
Lesbian commie from hell...
In response to your email.
You’re wasting your time chasing the democrat bait. Meanwhile questions about that pesky constitution aren’t going to stand in her way.
So he is gay as well? LOL!
Probably the same reason we don’t get the real life history of Øbama. Just the predigested politically correct pap.
Yeah, pretty much.
Is it personal?
The list, ping
Simple, because her personal story is probably filled with PROOF of her socialist/communist ideology!
Well, I bet Kagan has slept with more black women than
Obama. What is that called? Living vicariously or something?
Only if We The People and spineless, gutless Republicans allow it.
...If it’s good enough for Sarah!!!...
As far as I’m concerned she is asexual. The thought of her having sex with anyone......ugh.
Its the true underpinnings of a Homo-Leninist!
The lesbian thing is a distraction.
This is what pop-culture would like everyone to believe
The real issue: she is a true Homo-Leninist!
Her personal story is a distraction. They do not want to talk about her philosophical views on religion, liberty, free speech, the military, and most especially they don’t want to talk about her views on the constitution.
We already know that her philosophy is flexibly radical. Radical in that she considers “don’t ask don’t tell” to be worse than the holocaust. That might also tell us that she’s incredibly shallow as a human being (and a bit monomaniacal where homosexuality is concerned). And she’s flexible in that she had no problem blaming the military for following that order while working for the president who issued that order. Yes, she’s a radical, but her principles are not a show-stopper if her president thinks they’re politically inconvenient.
We know she has no problem using her power to lord it over people she disagrees with. Again we know that from the way she abused her power at Harvard.
Just based on her known fundamental philosophies, she is not qualified!
And further reflects upon Obamas Neo-Marxist, Homo-Leninist, Islamist and Racist underlying contempt for the constitution, peoples freedoms and that of being an America!
“Because she is a Lesbian”
It’s because she hates America and is a communist.
What tickles her fancy doesn’t interest anyone.
CAlM DOWN EVERYONE!
The Obama administration will release another hard-hitting interview done by a staffer that will put all questions to rest.
Now go back to bed little ones.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.