Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is Kagan's Personal Story Off Limits?
TalkingSides.com ^ | 05/14/10 | CaroleL

Posted on 05/14/2010 9:36:46 AM PDT by CaroleL

When Justice Sonia Sotomayor was nominated last year for her current position on the US Supreme Court, the Obama administration put the focus squarely on her personal story. But now in the case of Elena Kagan, the president and his team are attempting to prevent the latest nominee's personal story from reaching the American public.

(Excerpt) Read more at talkingsides.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: kagan; media; sotomayor; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: bt579

It’s the true underpinnings of a Homo-Leninist!


21 posted on 05/14/2010 10:29:12 AM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“The lesbian thing is a distraction.”

This is what pop-culture would like everyone to believe…

The real issue: she is a true Homo-Leninist!


22 posted on 05/14/2010 10:34:01 AM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CaroleL

Her personal story is a distraction. They do not want to talk about her philosophical views on religion, liberty, free speech, the military, and most especially they don’t want to talk about her views on the constitution.

We already know that her philosophy is flexibly radical. Radical in that she considers “don’t ask don’t tell” to be worse than the holocaust. That might also tell us that she’s incredibly shallow as a human being (and a bit monomaniacal where homosexuality is concerned). And she’s flexible in that she had no problem blaming the military for following that order while working for the president who issued that order. Yes, she’s a radical, but her principles are not a show-stopper if her president thinks they’re politically inconvenient.

We know she has no problem using her power to lord it over people she disagrees with. Again we know that from the way she abused her power at Harvard.


23 posted on 05/14/2010 10:43:48 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine

Just based on her known fundamental philosophies, she is not qualified!

And further reflects upon Obama’s Neo-Marxist, Homo-Leninist, Islamist and Racist underlying contempt for the constitution, people’s freedoms and that of being an America!


24 posted on 05/14/2010 10:54:47 AM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bt579

“Because she is a Lesbian”

No.

It’s because she hates America and is a communist.

What tickles her fancy doesn’t interest anyone.


25 posted on 05/14/2010 10:56:56 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CaroleL

CAlM DOWN EVERYONE!
The Obama administration will release another hard-hitting interview done by a staffer that will put all questions to rest.
Now go back to bed little ones.


26 posted on 05/14/2010 11:26:44 AM PDT by vpintheak (Love of God, Family and Country has made me an extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson