Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New pleadings filed today(5/24)in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC
orlytaitzesq

Posted on 05/24/2010 4:55:16 PM PDT by Man50D

Your Honor,

Part of the complaint in this action is a FOIA request. Mr. Obama, defendant in this case, via US attorney’s office sought dismissal of a FOIA request due to the fact that the refusal of information request by the Social Security administration was not final. Your Honor initially agreed, stating that the response from the Social Security administration was not final. Until now Taitz could not obtain a response from SSN, stating that it is a final decision.

Yesterday Taitz received a letter from Jonathan R. Cantor, Executive Director of Office of Privacy and Disclosure of the Social Security Administration dated and signed May 18, 2010. (Exhibit 1 Letter and envelope) As a stroke of providence the letter states “This is our final decision in this matter. If you still believe the decision is incorrect, however, the law permits you to seek review in a district court of the United States”.

As such an impediment was lifted, and the Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable court to grant her motion for reconsideration, so that the matter can be heard on the merits.

Legal Argument

In regards to the content of the response from the Social Security Administration, it relies on the finding of Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989).

It concedes following points:

1. Under 5U.S.C. §552(b)(6) exemption from the FOIA Taitz can obtain Obama’s application for the Social Security without Obama’s consent, if other conditions are fulfilled.

2. Social security or court cannot consider the identity of the requester- therefore the court cannot deny Taitz request due to her lack of standing or lack of particularized injury

3. Social Security or courts cannot consider the purpose for which the person requests the information.

4. Social security administration is obligated to provide information, if there is a public interest in knowing how SSA administers the Social Security Act.

5. The only objection to Taitz request by the SSA, is their claim that “disclosure of records containing personal information about President Obama would not shed light on how the agency performs its statutory duties”. This is the reason SSA provides as justification for their refusal to provide the information in question.

6. Taitz appeals this decision on following grounds:

7. Official on line records of Selective service confirm that Barack Obama has been using SS number 042-68-4425.

8. Information requested does not represent personal information of Mr. Obama, but rather personal information of another individual born in 1890, who would have been 120 years old, who is most probably deceased, but whose death was either never reported to the Social Security Administration or was deleted from the records of the Social Security Administration prior or around 1986, and the number was unlawfully assumed by Mr. Obama. According to previously submitted sworn affidavit of recently retired senior deportation officer with the department of Homeland Security Mr. John Sampson, this Social Security number was issued to another individual in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1977, while Obama never resided there.

9. One of the printouts provided by Mr. Sampson show Mr. Obama’s origin in Equatorial Guiney, which is different from the official information stating his origin to be Hawaii and Kenya.

10. According to previously submitted sworn affidavit from Susan Daniels, licensed private investigator, certified by the Department of Homeland Security, this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1977, to an individual born in 1890. As Mr. Obama never resided in CT and was not born in 1890, Ms. Daniels concludes that this is not his SS number. Ms. Daniels provided a follow up report, showing that according to multiple national databases there are numerous Social Security numbers connected to name Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, none of which were issued in Hawaii.

11. According to memoirs by Mr. Obama, such as Dreams From My Father Mr. Obama started working in Baskin Robbins store in Honolulu HI around 1975-1976, he needed SS number to obtain employment, and he would have had to obtain a SS number from HI, not CT.

12. According to a previously submitted sworn Affidavit by retired elite Scotland Yard officer of anti organized crime and anti communist proliferation units Mr. Neil Sankey, there are multiple records in National databases, showing Obama using multiple Social Security numbers, which are either numbers of deceased individuals or numbers never assigned, none of which were issued in HI.

13. According to the sworn declaration by forensic export Sandra Ramsey-Lines, Obama’s short version certification of live birth provided to the public cannot be considered as genuine without forensic examination of the original birth certificate, which Obama refuses to unseal. Lack of valid original birth certificate with the name of the doctor and the name of the hospital and signatures, could attest to the foreign birth and could explain the need to seek SS numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.

14. Madeleine Payne Dunham, Obama’s maternal grandmother, used to volunteer in Oahu circuit court probate department, where she was able to obtain SS numbers of deceased in individuals. Additionally, both Ms. Payne and Obama’s mother Ann Dunham(Obama, Soetoro) worked as loan officers and had an opportunity to view SS numbers of others.

15. As the public has a right to know how SSA performs its statutory duties, the public has a right to know how Obama obtained these SS numbers, and see the original application for SS number 042-68-4425, as well as other numbers used by Obama according to National databases.

16. Without such disclosure the public will have no trust and confidence that SSA properly performs its statutory duties, specifically in light of the fact that an individual occupying the highest office in the land, could get there using Social Security numbers of others.

17. Public has a right to know, what happens to estates of individuals, who are deceased, and whose death was never reported.

18. The public has a right to know if this breach of SSA is limited to Obama, or whether it is widespread.

m. Taitz would venture to submit to the court, that there was never a more justified need for a disclosure, as there is in this case, with a SSN wrongfully assumed and used by a President and Commander in Chief.

1. Taitz will be willing to consent to have initial discovery under seal and in camera.

1. Taitz is requesting discovery to be done expeditiously, as she is continuously subjected to death threats Exhibit 2, which would not stop, as long as this mystery exists and there is an incentive for some to intimidate attorneys seeking answers. Taitz has a family and three children, which makes this matter more urgent.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fraud; judgeroycelamberth; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; socialsecurity; ssn; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: SatinDoll
Oh, I [Non-Sequitur] Oh, I mistook you for someone who wanted to rid us of a usurper, you know, a patriotic person rather than the boot-licking troll you really are N-S. My mistake!l you really are N-S. My mistake!

Yes, a wacky Obot troll.

41 posted on 05/25/2010 6:11:22 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man; Mr Rogers

And that’s is probably also how they are going to handle the Sestak-Gate, don’t you think???


42 posted on 05/26/2010 4:47:36 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54; Man50D

Some of those have bogus addresses!!!


43 posted on 05/26/2010 5:13:54 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK; thecodont; Man50D; LucyT; Red Steel; STARWISE

Well, we have another dead man shot in the head(?) outside a church and nothing more about that case, just moot???

Brennan should be able to explain!!!


44 posted on 05/26/2010 5:18:18 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

You have some FINO’s here and they really “love” Orly Taitz!

When that name is posted here she gets all the Soetoro brigade out of the hole like Prairie dogs ready for attack!!

Their talking points given to them never fails, yet they never done squat themselves trying to remove the W.H. impostor who is taking our country down the Marxism lane with their approval hurrays!!!


45 posted on 05/26/2010 5:32:57 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

46 posted on 05/26/2010 9:12:23 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
For a cover-up conspiracy that includes, among others, the Supreme Court, State Hawaii officials, members of Congress, Fox news, Rush, Beck, Hannity, Levin, Medved, MSM, etc

You forgot the CIA, the Catholic Church, the Bavarian Illuminati, they Greys from Zeta Reticuli, and Elvis.

47 posted on 05/26/2010 9:13:47 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Watching Orly Taitz practice law has been like watching a two-year-old trying to defuse a nuclear bomb.


48 posted on 05/26/2010 9:14:18 AM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
She could have Perry Mason on her legal team and it still wouldn't save her.

If she had Perry Mason, Daniel Webster, Atticus Finch, and Oliver Wendell Holmes on her team, the other four would bring the team's overall level up to "barely adequate".

49 posted on 05/26/2010 9:19:42 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Oh, I mistook you for someone who wanted to rid us of a usurper, you know, a patriotic person rather than the boot-licking troll you really are N-S. My mistake!

"Troll" does not mean "someone who disagrees with me".

50 posted on 05/26/2010 9:21:47 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reaganairport
If she had Perry Mason, Daniel Webster, Atticus Finch, and Oliver Wendell Holmes on her team, the other four would bring the team's overall level up to "barely adequate".

Only if they gagged her and chained her to her chair.

51 posted on 05/26/2010 9:36:13 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Only if they gagged her and chained her to her chair.

Somehow that remark from you doesn't surprise me.(freudian slip?)

52 posted on 05/26/2010 9:38:32 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I have always been underwhelmed by Orly’s alleged legal talents. I admit it freely.


53 posted on 05/26/2010 9:41:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: reaganairport

“Troll” does not mean “someone who disagrees with me”.

You must be new here...


54 posted on 05/26/2010 10:00:20 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

LOL! You don’t have to be here very long before you get somebody accusing you of being a “troll” (somebody on another thread accused me of being somebody who quit posting her a few months ago — still dunno what’s up with that).


55 posted on 05/26/2010 10:23:00 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: reaganairport

In the case of Non-Sequitur, a person I and many others have had numerous dealings with, the description ‘troll’ is accurate. It results from experience.

I have many civil discussions with others on Free Republic. Only two or three are truly ‘trolls’ and I generally never talk to those. A couple more are just disagreable, nasty sorts I avoid.


56 posted on 05/26/2010 1:46:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

All I’ve seen from Non-Sequitur is tough and logically sound (I presume his handle is meant ironically) argumentation.


57 posted on 05/26/2010 2:04:37 PM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: reaganairport

Congratulations.


58 posted on 05/26/2010 2:16:33 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: All

canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.

(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.

(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.

(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..

Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

___________________________________

A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:

Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.

Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.

She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!

She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880

Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a ‘mail order’ attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our ‘great’ attorneys and ‘patriots’ who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.

So let’s get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots don’t need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. That’s why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.

HELP HER!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcChG5pRTOE&feature=player_embedded


59 posted on 05/27/2010 4:01:23 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson