Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Similarities with the old USSR.
Dum Spiro Spero ^

Posted on 07/21/2010 6:50:12 PM PDT by Argentine-Firecracker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: The_Reader_David

Wow. Talk about determination!!! And you’re right. Owning a camera in the USSR was not a crime. But taking photos of “prohibited” areas, as determined by the state, was.


21 posted on 07/21/2010 8:54:52 PM PDT by Argentine-Firecracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Argentine-Firecracker
So what should you do if you’re taking photos and a security guard or police officer approaches you and tells you to stop?

If I'm on private property I do as the security guard asks. If I'm in a public area taking photos of people I know or the exteriors of buildings, etc. I tell him to mind his own business.

If a police officer tells me to stop, I comply no matter what - not because he's right, but because a malicious police officer can make a law-abiding citizen's life pure hell. The letter to the police department and public officials pointing out that police have no right to make such demands comes later.
22 posted on 07/21/2010 9:07:49 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argentine-Firecracker

If approached throw your camera to the ground, stomp on it and say to the nice security person, “this damn piece of crap never did work!”


23 posted on 07/21/2010 10:23:13 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
Getting permission - in writing - is required if you ever hope to sell the photos. And you should have it for private use as well.

Buildings/property are now protected by copyright law - for sale or not.


That's exactly why I stick to scenic and floral photography.
24 posted on 07/22/2010 3:56:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Oddly, I have never had any problems - I carry a standard release form in my camera bag (a stack actually) and all that is required is a signature.

Private home owners are a crap shoot. I do my best to hide the address if film, blur the address if digital.

Most folks are happy that thier business will wind up in a Nationally published magazine.
I make a point shooting several frames with the business sign as an obvious part of the photo. Rarely does the editor choose to use those, but I cannot help that.

If I am going to be back in the area I will drop a copy of the magazine to the outfit. Sometimes the publisher will send a copy or two for me.

Other times, businesses will send you good quality photos/images/slides with a release for use in an article. Commercial photography can be pretty cool at times - I once got a personal tour of Hoover Dam into areas the public is normally not allowed for a photo shoot - another, the AKRR let me shoot thier maintenance areas, normally off limits. I love 'big machines' so it was both fun and profit. You might see if there are opporunities in your area.

25 posted on 07/22/2010 9:43:11 AM PDT by ASOC (Alpha India Alpha Three Tango Alpha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson