Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/2obeb0 ^ | July 25, 2010 | Kim Patterson

Posted on 07/26/2010 10:31:44 AM PDT by Between the Lines

Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owes her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense. The USA has finally become the laughing stock of the world. GOD help and deliver us.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: certifigate; corruption; harvard; harvard4corruption; harvard4perjury; harvard4resumefraud; kagan; kagan4corruption; kagan4perjury; kagan4resumefraud; kagan4sharia; naturalborncitizen; nobc; nobirthcertificayte; nohonesty; notransparency; notruth; noveritas; obama; perjury; resumefraud; sharia; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2010 10:31:50 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

..And all this time I thought it was because Sotomayor needed a girlfriend.. Or maybe Janet Napolitano.


2 posted on 07/26/2010 10:34:00 AM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

So the Supreme Court is in on the conspiracy?


3 posted on 07/26/2010 10:35:11 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Crap! I was in the middle of posting this & you beat me to it! LOL!!! Good for you! Thanks for sharing this juicy piece of info.


4 posted on 07/26/2010 10:35:52 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Wow! We need some more investigation into THIS...


5 posted on 07/26/2010 10:36:59 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
A twit is defined as an insignificant or bothersome person.

Is 'twitlonger' thus the ultimate in insignificance?

6 posted on 07/26/2010 10:42:42 AM PDT by verity (Obama, the BS and rhetoric President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

ok, i went to the site...pulled up obama under dockets and only 2 out of 21 cases named kagen....am i looking at the right info....this story says all the cases she was the solicitor general....


7 posted on 07/26/2010 10:43:27 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No,the evidence is there that she was the frot person for all the birther suits.
This is like getting Jamie Gorlick(er) on the 9-11 commision.


8 posted on 07/26/2010 10:53:39 AM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No,the evidence is there that she was the frot person for all the birther suits.
This is like getting Jamie Gorlick(er) on the 9-11 commision.


9 posted on 07/26/2010 10:53:39 AM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wiggen
She has to be the front person. She's the Solicitor General.

There's no payback here because Obama is her boss, and it's her job to do what she did.

10 posted on 07/26/2010 10:59:13 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Despicable, but I am not surprised.


11 posted on 07/26/2010 11:12:37 AM PDT by VaeVictis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Did Kagen ever argue any case before the high court while Solicitor General ?


12 posted on 07/26/2010 11:14:06 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I have no idea.


13 posted on 07/26/2010 11:18:53 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

See min 2:50 & 4:50 in this vid, from the Pittsburgh 2009 G20 meeting. Irrespective of anything Icke says, just look at them. This was not on our TV news, nor will it be.:

“David Icke-Message for the uniforms and dark suits”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNoduSUwN8Y&feature=player_embedded


14 posted on 07/26/2010 11:34:55 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

(Audio) “Gerald Celente on Dr. Bill Deagle Nutrimedical report” 20 July 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afPqRLYecnY


15 posted on 07/26/2010 11:38:10 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“So the Supreme Court is in on the conspiracy?

Well, they sure as Hell didn’t verify anything about him.


16 posted on 07/26/2010 11:42:22 AM PDT by CodeToad ("Idiocracy" is not just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Sotomayor was nominated after it was revealed that she PREwrote the oppinion that stopped electronic funds transfer garnishments. (the NY judges met and agreed they wanted this stopped because it was clogging their dockets. It is also why she recused herself from the USSC argments)

Spoils system court appointments.


17 posted on 07/26/2010 11:42:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

so this means if any birth case does come before the supreme court she would have to recuse herself, leaving the conservative court members in a clear majority, right? so why is this a good thing for obama?


18 posted on 07/26/2010 12:22:04 PM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

No Obama ineligibility appeal has been reviewed before the Supreme Court because the Supreme Court has denied all eight attempts. The official legalese is “Denied the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.” In normal English that means “no thanks, we’re not interested.”

The Supreme Court operates under a tradition known as “the rule of four.” It takes four of the nine justices to agree in order to “grant cert” which means to Grant a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and hear an appeal before the full court. In a typical year about 95% of appeals are denied and about 5% are granted “Cert” for judicial review before the full Court.

The eight denied Obama ineligibility/natural born citizen appeals are: Berg v Obama, Beverly v FEC, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Herbert v Obama, Lightfoot v Bowen, Schneller v Cortes, and Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

As Solicitor General, Kagan’s name should appear on all federal government appeals at the Supreme Court. But as you can see, only two of the eight appeals actually named Barack Hussein Obama as a defendant.

Nothing to see hear, please move along.


19 posted on 07/26/2010 12:31:34 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
There's no payback here because Obama is her boss, and it's her job to do what she did.

... and to keep doing it as a Supreme, especially if an eligibility case heads her way, in payback to the person who put her there.

How stupid do you think we are???

20 posted on 07/26/2010 12:36:24 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson