Posted on 09/16/2010 1:38:56 PM PDT by rosettasister
Since before the 2008 election I have been involved in legal research on the Barack Hussein Obama Article II eligibility issue.
I’ve advised attorney Phil Berg and contributed to motions filed by Dr. Orly Taitz.
Prior to both the election and the January 9, 2009 Certification of Electoral Votes, I faxed and e-mailed seventy-seven Republican congressmen, including John McCain, advising them that ‘native-born’ was not synonymous with Article II’s ‘natural born citizen.’
The Internet publication of Obama’s Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth puzzled me, and I believe I was the first to discover the Hawaiian statutes, Haw. Stat. Rev. § 338-17.8 and 338-5 that permitted a Kenyan-born Obama, Jr. to have his birth registered in Hawaii.
(Excerpt) Read more at paralegalnm.wordpress.com ...
How to get eligibility ruling from Supremes
Lawyer outlines strategy to prompt court decision
——————————————————————————–
Posted: May 16, 2009
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=98245
At the point where the arguments over Obama’s eligibility eventually reach a courtroom, there are many valid arguments against his eligibility, according to a paralegal whose research has played a role in some of the pending legal actions.
Leonard Daneman told WND he’s written to members of the U.S. Supreme Court suggesting they render an opinion on the definition of “natural born citizen” without addressing the political ramifications, simply to establish a precedent in the law.
“The Supreme Court may feel obligated to ignore, or even dismiss the ‘merits’ of the numerous eligibility cases due to the political questions doctrine,” he told WND.
“But the court can still publish … an apolitical opinion solely on the law, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 5, The Natural Born Citizen Eligibility Clause.”
Many critics have said the overwhelming circumstantial evidence available to date suggests Obama is not a U.S. citizen, because of his move to Indonesia.
“When the Constitution was being composed, John Jay asked George Washington, ‘whether it would not be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government and to declare expressly that the command(er) in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born citizen,’” Daneman wrote to the Supreme Court.
“The chief author of the 14th Amendment, Sen. John A. Bingham, wrote,
‘[E]very human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen,’” Daneman’s letter continued.
His suggested the Supreme Court justices release a definition of “natural born citizen” and then “the political questions will then remain in the proper forum, or branch of government.”
Tokaji said the Constitution itself clearly recognizes the possibility of an ineligible president, demanding in the 20th Amendment that
“if the president elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified.”
“Unfortunately,” he continued, “it does not explicitly say who is to make the determination whether a president elect has ‘failed to qualify.’”
“There is a good reason for believing that this sort of dispute belongs in state court.
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution provides:
‘Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the Congress,’” he said.
Aligning with that view was the 2000 election decision by the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore.
The high court found the state supreme court’s construction of certain provisions of state election law went beyond the bounds of proper statutory interpretation.
Yet none of the justices disputed that state courts may hear cases alleging violations of state election states, Tokaji found.
He concluded that because a state court’s opinion would be based on federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court then could hear the case on a petition for writ of certiorari.
“This is true even if the original state-court action would not have been justiciable in federal court,” he said.
That loon is still around?
That is not how the courts work.
They can't do that.
They can only issue opinions regarding points of law that have been brought before them, and have had arguments pro and con.
Even if a court makes a statement on a particular point, it is not valid unless the point is before them in a case.
The BEST remaining strategy is that each State's supervisor of elections whether it be the State Secretary of State, or whomever, REQUIRE that candidates personally present VALID documentation proving that they are a natural born citizen PRIOR to placing their name on the state's ballot in 2012. No photoshopped, or internet copies, but valid legal documents with proof of authenticity.
I let Mr. Daneman know about this post.
So, hopefully he’ll see your replies.
Did you find out who shot Kennedy or how they faked the moon landings, too?
If you’re interested, you can find some Leonard Daneman comments here. Just scroll down.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/09/deafening-silence-from-the-lakin-camp/
For example:
Leonard Daneman 16. Sep, 2010 at 2:33 pm
“Do you have a credible cite for Velamoor being an attorney for the President?”
Yes. I do. The president’s representing law firm, that is. Coe, Perkins was it?
Good news. My attorney friend/associate just won his case, but it is without prejudice.
My research may still finalize the win in the end, but the respite for now is welcome.
Thanks for the lively comments, but I have to go . . .
please read the Koran and associated and recommended writings as suggested in the previous posts.
May God be Found True, and Every Man a Liar.
The bible per se is not the source of bloodshed, even the French and Spanish persecutions of the Jews and the Huguenots . . . those were actions of men and monarchs.
History shows a flawed series of civilizations and governments . . .
let us protect this one, a constitutional Republic of great value and privilege to the common man (us).
The Birther Movement is now so full of trolls and troglodytes that one cannot take any report seriously. Rehashing the rehashed. Bottom line:
Our POTUS has:
(a)Not proven where he was born, and so far, has not had too.
(b)Cannot possibly prove that he is a "Natural Born Citizen," because his father, or who is legally his father because he accepted paternity, is of all things a foreigner from Darkest Africa, British Section.
(c) Although ineligible to have run or to serve, he is in fact, the sitting POTUS, and cannot be removed except by Impeachment in the House and Conviction in the Senate.
(d) Barring the unforeseen, he is your POTUS until 2012, when we can go through all of this incredibly interesting stuff again.
(e) Even if it gets to the right courts with the right plaintiff, lawyers, and judges, ain't much can happen until his term is up, or practically up.
IOW, there isn't all that much to be done about The Mombasa Moonbeam. IMHO, better to concentrate on reversing, nullifying , and not funding what he has already done.
You even have to present an original of your BC when you get a drivers license. No copies. Shouldn’t be too much to expect for a person who wants the job of president.
In which State?
bump
You even have to present an original of your BC when you get a drivers license. No copies.
...ahhh, well TEXAS for one...
ymmv
I enlisted in the Army, obtained a passport and driver's license, and got married with my COLB.
A judge with balls that ‘clang’
Leonard Daneman 17. Sep, 2010 at 3:06 am
The cognitive dissonance is deafening. Where to begin . . .
1) The only dictum that’s authoritative is God’s and the framers, e.g., the bible, commentaries, letters, the Federalist Papers.
Judge Grey’s slip of the tongue in Ark is not. Nor is it in Liakakos or Ankeny.
The only thing you should take from Wong Kim Ark is a state’s right to confer citizenship on a native-born child to avoid aparthied.
Citizenship at birth to those who already have nationality is a conflict of law, if not lawlessness itself.
[....]
4) Respect for lawyers who passed the bar?
The second attorney I sued lost his law license, and a handful of others who crossed me lost their jobs.
I have respect for very few lawyers.
5) Orly Taitz grew up with the Cyrillic alphabet, got her DDS in Hebrew, and her ‘mail-order’ law degree in English.
I’ve struggled through her pleadings . . . yes . . . her Social Security issue is still giving pause to many.
6) A constitutionally ineligible president re-instates the ‘death tax’ and hundreds of estates lose over half their equity to the goverment.
The eligible candidate, however, ran on extending the repeal of the death tax indefinitely.
At first look, the issue is political.
However, the acting president’s actions are invalid and void if his presidency violates the constitution.
Who is injured in fact? What laws have been broken in nexus to the harm done?
Can you argue that a man willing to violate the constitution to become president also has no respect for private property?
Is a violation of the constitution by a president so serious that standing claimed by a citizen should be looked upon in a most favorable light?
There will come a day when a judge with balls that ‘clang’ takes on an Obama eligibility case, and I can assure you that Chicago Law School adjunct instructor in Constitutional Law will be found guilty of fraud and negligence.
‘Oooops’ will not get him off this time.
Found at Obama Conspiracy
Nope. Texas requires either an "Original or certified copy of a birth certificate issued by the appropriate State Bureau of Vital Statistics or equivalent agency..."
Obama's certified copy of his birth certificate, which he posted online, is good enough for the State of Texas.
ahh, just having been to the DPS, I don’t believe you are correct, as the copy on line isn’t certified and doesn’t have the required info... and is a proven forgery besides.
ymmv
Yes it is. It came directly from the Department of Health.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.