Posted on 09/19/2010 10:01:00 PM PDT by onyx
NEW YORK (MarketWatch)
One of the enduring questions that has surrounded Sarah Palin since the 2008 election season is whether or not she is a feminist.
~snip~
Traister muses that America could see an election race in 2016 pitting Palin and Clinton. By then, she reckons, the nation would embrace two women in positions of influence and political power. That would be every journalist’s dream race because the two adversaries would be so clearly different in every possible way. It would make for a memorable election race.
Here’s hoping.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
Who gets to lose to Barack in 2012 or who's the one term Republican? LOL.
Interesting concept - Sarah Palin versus Hillary Clinton in a race for the U.S. presidency. However, the ‘2016’ date is a clue that the writer assumes Obama would be a two-term president, which is highly unlikely.
If you defy these 'truths', you will be decimated by the left.
Right, that was my take also.
Two term obama,— who gets to lose to the Marxist in 2012?
Right, feminist is defined by abortion rights according to the feminazis.
Maybe Clinton wins in 2012...
Aha!
:)
Not that I want that to happen!!!!
Oh, I realize *that* - yikes!
Willard "Mitt" Huckalenty?
Election race in 2016 pitting Palin and Clinton?They knew they didn't dare put 2012 for fear of having to endure the wrath of the White House press corp.Who gets to lose to Barack in 2012 or who's the one term Republican? LOL.
One of the enduring questions that has surrounded Sarah Palin since the 2008 election season is whether or not she is a feminist.It's not a question I have but I sure hope not.
Good grief, she’ll be 69 in 2016.
Can you imagine?????
“Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the state.”
- Larrey Anderson
Maybe we no longer need labels. Maybe we should just see the person.
LOL. That’s right. I forgot about that.
Of course she is. She just happens to define "feminist" a tad different than the whackos do.
Why would Sarah be a one termer? I don’t get it,, and in what world would Obama defeat her. He only had success before because he was absolutley devoid of any visible record.
He’s inarticulate and personally, i don’t see many signs of his vaunted intellect. Sarah will wipe him out.
Ok,, now i see,,, election race in *2016*. I need coffee,,,
LOL.
And the Hildabeast would be .....age 69...as NordP pointed out...LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.