Skip to comments.BREAKING ! - Obama Was Not Constitutionally Certified To Run For President! - DOCUMENTED! (video)
Posted on 09/27/2010 6:19:44 PM PDT by blueyon
BREAKING ! - Obama Was Not Constitutionally Certified To Run For President! - DOCUMENTED!
This will get suppressed faster than Bill Clinton’s abuse of Gennifer Flowers.
oh, piss it won’t work
Posted 18 hours ago. Old news. Use search.
Worked for me, try again.
Until the DC Coup enforcement infrastructure is crippled, we can't do much to rectify the situation.
maaaaaaan, the one time I do not use search first...Busted. LOL
A job for Issa in January.
Oh piss it will work.
That's okay....I didn't see it 18 hours ago.
ANY law which infringes on our right to keep and bear arms is unconstitutional, and thus, is NO LAW. Marbury v. Madison. US supreme court, 1807
The maker of the video is refering to DNC documents concerning party practice and procedure. That’s not the same thing as federal or state election law or Constitutional requirements.
Hawaii law requires that either the DNC or the Hawaii Democratic Party certify the Constitutional eligibility of their candidates in order for the name to be placed on the ballot.
The DNC claims that they leave the investigation of eligibility up to the state parties. But the Hawaii Democratic Party refused to certify Obama’s eligibility - which should have meant that Pelosi would defer to the ones who had done the actual investigation and would likewise refuse to certify eligibility.
The truth of the matter is that we have documentation showing that NEITHER group looked at Obama’s documentation. And for good reason: he has no legally valid documentation from Hawaii. What he has is an amended (and almost certainly also late) birth certificate - as confirmed by the Hawaii Department of Health.
IOW, Pelosi and everyone in the democratic leadership knew that Obama has no legal proof of being eligible for the presidency but they signed a sworn statement saying he was anyway.
That is called perjury, and it is an impeachable offense. At least Pelosi and Obama are guilty of it.
See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/certificate-of-nomination-summary/ for the documentation regarding the certificate of nomination problem.
See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/the-summary-cnn-doesnt-want-you-to-see/ for a summary of what we know about Obama’s amended birth certificate.
See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/content-index/ for an index of the information available on the blog, organized by subject matter.
Its payback TIME!
I'd like to see the text of the law to see what is actually required. Sounds like they did “certify” their candidate, but no one checked any evidence of actual eligibility, if I understand what your saying. If so, why is there no challenge in a Hawaiian court?
I'd love to know what the Hawaiian Dept. of Health or Vital Statistics actually has on file. The Certification of Live Birth that has been bantered around is a later issued document which serves as a type of receipt for something that is actually on file, but I know you're aware of this already. We just don't know what is actually on file.
Wish we had other records available as well.
Hawaii Democrats ducked declaring Obama eligible under the Constitution because they knew something that made them go into CYA mode.
There isn't any other explanation. It's stories like this that drive free thinking, freedom-loving people nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.