Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama threatens to divorce Barack Obama if he tries to seek second term
Examiner.com ^ | October 3, 2010 | Marc Schenker

Posted on 10/03/2010 5:56:53 AM PDT by Suvroc10

Michelle Obama has threatened to divorce Barack Obama if he tries to seek a second term as president. That is the report according to well-placed and insider sources from the National Enquirer, who work in the nation’s capital. This report of strife and all-out threat-making in the Obamas’ marriage is not the first time that reports have arisen, which detail that not everything is well in Obamaland. Earlier this year, reports emerged that Barack Obama himself—also known by liberals everywhere as either "The Messiah" or "The One"—had engaged in a sordid affair with none other than a former campaign aide by the name of Vera Baker. While there have only been reports of said alleged affair, if true, it would mean that the apple did not fall far from the tree, seeing as how Barack Obama Senior (anti-colonial socialist that he was) had many affairs himself.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 0bamosque; 0dinga0bama; 72degrees4you; 78degrees4obama; baraqwillneverallow; barry; burning4christians; c0caine; c0kehead2012; comfortzone; d0per; divorce; h00insane; h00sane0bama; hamask; hamasque; hamosque; hawaiianlie; hawaiianlies; homosque; inyourcomfortzone; junkieinthew00dpile; kenyamuslim; kenyanesian; la0; laotaliban; mask0f0bama; masque0fobama; maybealottablow00000; michelle; michellemabelle; mosque0f0bama; obamas; sn0rtsn0rtsn0rtsn0rt; spain4only75000day; victorym0sque; wagya4just100pound; zer0smosque
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: Suvroc10

Confucius Say
It is better to lose a lover than love a loser.


21 posted on 10/03/2010 6:10:48 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Plugs may have a bone to pick with you.


22 posted on 10/03/2010 6:11:25 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Yeah. That’s what I mean.


23 posted on 10/03/2010 6:11:43 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("You can -- even must -- yell 'fire' in a crowded theater. It just has to be the truth." J. Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Interesting, using gossip rags to disseminate propaganda and float trial balloons. There was no Vera Baker affair, that was another manufactured tale to counter all the homosexual crap that was starting to surface.

Yep, blame that cranky old ogre Michelle for sheer unelectablity borne of stupid policies and acting stupidly as President.

Heck, if it was me, I’d say throw me in that briar patch and run again on purpose, but then again, I’d never have married her in the first place.


24 posted on 10/03/2010 6:11:58 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Seriously, they probably aren't horrific enough to suit her special hatred of the U.S..

Never forget that till Obama ran for President this was the “first time she was proud of her country” ... .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYY73RO_egw

I suspect Obama realizes that even with enormous cheating,people have caught on. The cat is out of the bag and the consequences of his hideous agenda are too hard to hide. So what does a VILE LIBERAL do? Turn into a victim! Perhaps that is the pattern here.

25 posted on 10/03/2010 6:12:08 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason

Who had the goods on John Edwards while your “wonderful sources” protected him up through the ‘08 election primaries? Personally, I think this is irrelevant at this time, but their covering for Edwards in some scenarios was instrumental in Obama beating Hillary Clinton.


26 posted on 10/03/2010 6:13:09 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Are you serious? These people have come up to the East Side. They’re living the good life each and every day. Do you think for one minute they’re going to give that up?

He hasn’t been in office two years yet, and she gives him this ultimatum?

Another worthless POS article...

I think I saw the same Enquirer rag.....nonsense...

Of course, on the other hand, wouldn’t put it past that wimpy weasel to throw her under the bus too, and say “she wants me to not run again.. so I’m not...”


27 posted on 10/03/2010 6:14:00 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Praying today for -25, better yet -26......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

It is pretty obvious she is not happy. What I can’t believe is that she would give up all the perks...

I wonder if this is being floated as the reason he won’t run again versus the real reason..whatever it may be ..as in Soros dumping him...


28 posted on 10/03/2010 6:14:17 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Sounds like they are trying to create a ‘victim’ sympathy for Michelle, similar to what they did for poor widdle Hillary when that waskley wabbit Bill was doing his thang in their first term in the White House.


29 posted on 10/03/2010 6:16:34 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sueuprising
Quoting the article ( I'm not accusing you of being liberal):

And before any liberal or Democrat reactionaries get their knickers all bent out of shape because this report comes from the National Enquirer, consider this. The Enquirer, today, is more reliable and less biased than the dishonest yellow journalism that passes as "news" from the major networks and the big papers like the New York Times. After all, while the aforementioned, mainstream media was concealing John Edwards’ scandalous, extramarital affair, only the National Enquirer diligently continued to report on it until the dishonorable Edwards finally had no choice but to admit his infidelity publicly. Thus, the track record of the Enquirer on big, political stories is actually quite solid. Just think of that, libs.

30 posted on 10/03/2010 6:17:11 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“I wonder if this is being floated as the reason he won’t run again versus the real reason..whatever it may be ..as in Soros dumping him...”

Michele could care less about affairs. I beleive this is just a pre-empted cover story for Obama to exit from running again. There is no way materialism and living like a goddess would be less important to anything. She’s another material girl who hates America. Michelle doens’t have an honest bone in her body. They are set for life.


31 posted on 10/03/2010 6:19:05 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I think I saw the same Enquirer rag.....nonsense...


Yep the Enquirer, but they did have the John Edwards thing correct.....

From the article:

...And before any liberal or Democrat reactionaries get their knickers all bent out of shape because this report comes from the National Enquirer........


32 posted on 10/03/2010 6:19:10 AM PDT by deport (TEXAS -- Early Voting begins OCT. 18, 2010 (vote early and often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
What's really wretched is that The National Enquirer and Pravda are more credible--by far--than CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, NYTimes, LATimes, etc.
33 posted on 10/03/2010 6:19:34 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("You can -- even must -- yell 'fire' in a crowded theater. It just has to be the truth." J. Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
This would basically leave Hillary in a match with no real contenders.

Except that Hillary thought she was on her way to a coronation in 2008, and got blindsided.

It happened then, it would happen again for 2012.

And hopefully, the same can happen to Romney, Gingrich, Huckabee, JBush.
34 posted on 10/03/2010 6:20:50 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Nice play. If Barry wants to run again he’ll have to prove that he’s eligible to do so. This way he can step down to “spend more time with his family”.This is a manufactured story used as a coverup for the real reason that he may not run again.


35 posted on 10/03/2010 6:22:02 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Don’t believe a word about any of this. Did you believe all the BS about the Clintons?

Pure BS. Moochelle isn’t unhappy, except that America isn’t swallowing her Staninist repression as easy as they did at first.

Moochelle hates America and hates whites and Joos. The most hateful and bigoted people EVER in the White House. A true disgrace.

Of course, Democrats have no shame, are ALWAYS corrupt and will let pedophiles and felons run wild if they vote for them.


36 posted on 10/03/2010 6:22:32 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

so what!

they’d refuse to ever produce the divorce papers, so ya either take their word for it or....


37 posted on 10/03/2010 6:23:06 AM PDT by gunnyg (WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, Our 'Novembers' Are Gone,,,So Few Can "grok" It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
Earlier this year, reports emerged that Barack Obama himself—also known by liberals everywhere as either "The Messiah" or "The One"

What an odd thing to put in this article. I checked the source twice to see if it was satire.

At any rate, this smacks of early excuses the dems are putting out there to explain why they won't let him run again.

38 posted on 10/03/2010 6:23:12 AM PDT by CAluvdubya ("Sarah Palin fights, we cannot spare her."--GonzoGOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

It would be the best thing that ever happened to the Democrats.


39 posted on 10/03/2010 6:24:12 AM PDT by BiggieLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Nope, that would be Rudolph Schenker.


40 posted on 10/03/2010 6:25:24 AM PDT by Ammo Republic 15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson