Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Department of [In]Justice and Sharia Prosecutes Infidels for "Hate" Speech Crimes
Atlas Shrugs ^ | 4 November 2010 | Pam Geller (and other sources quoted)

Posted on 11/05/2010 9:26:55 AM PDT by combat_boots

And so it begins. This is an outrage. An infidel was prosecuted by Obama's Department of Justice and sent to jail for a year for saying in an email that he would “do WHATEVER it takes to eradicate Islam.” So what? A year in prison? A $3,000 fine?

We witnessed a traitorous Department of Justice refuse to prosecute the Black Panther party for voter harassment and intimidation with weapons on Election day. Senior DoJ lawyers resigned in protest.

"Obama has Violated His Oath of Office" in Racist Dept of Justice Decision to Drop New Black Panther Party Voter Intimidation Case and Mandate DOJ Policy: "No Voter Intimidation Cases Will Brought Against Black Defendent Where the Victim is White" (read it at Atlas Shrugs)

The Department of Justice sponsored a booth at the Muslim Brotherhood front ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention underwritten by, among others, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked CAIR.

Obama's Department of Justice sued a New Jersey county, alleging that it refused to accommodate a Muslim employee's khimar, a religious head covering. The suit seeks monetary damages and also seeks to require Essex County to adopt a policy that accommodates the religious observances and practices of employees.

Further, Obama's Department of Justice dropped the "charges" against the Muslims who blew up the USS Cole.

Obama's Department of Justice is still trying to bring the 911 mastermind to New York City for a civilian trial. And these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. The prosecution of Sobolevskiy is by far the worst, and Judge David G. Bernthal, referring to the defendant’s crime as “an act of terror,” is in need of immediate removal. Nuts.

(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: doj; holder; islam; islamists; muslims; obama; palin; sharia
.
1 posted on 11/05/2010 9:27:03 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

bump


2 posted on 11/05/2010 9:29:39 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

that is not a specific, credible threat.


3 posted on 11/05/2010 9:33:29 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Hmmm, how many days until the 112th Congress gets seated?
Eric the Red and the DOJ better start getting lawyered up riiiiiiiight now.

4 posted on 11/05/2010 9:34:20 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

obama justice department head needs to be impeached. This is corruption. Theres no equal justice in the US with him around


5 posted on 11/05/2010 9:37:22 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From Jihad Watch today:
6 posted on 11/05/2010 9:40:15 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Which means there had to be more to it. In my experience, there virtually always is, and these statements are designed to get people riled up. Not that the current DOJ isn’t despicable, but let’s use facts, not hyperbole and assumption.

Colonel, USAFR


7 posted on 11/05/2010 9:45:14 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

A thoughtful person who read Atlas Shrugs went and looked up the case she’s talking about, and found the whole statement the defendant made. He quoted it in a comment on the article you posted. It said:

Close down the CIMIC [Central Illinois Mosque and Islamic Center] by May 12th, or it will be closed for you. the muslims that attend it are not to be seen in public with their beards or hijabs. tell them to get rid of such things. failure to comply will result in much tribulations for you and muslims in the region. i am not afraid to do whatever it takes to eradicate islam. WHATEVER it takes.

As the Atlas shrugs commenters after that one said, this is not the easiest statement to defend. I support Atlas Shrugs and think Pam Geller is a brave person fighting the good fight, but I’m not sure I’d have picked this particular battle.

Of course, as one of the commenters pointed out, there’s plenty of violence and threats in the Koran. Should we expect the Justice Department to punish people who disseminate that?


8 posted on 11/05/2010 10:10:14 AM PDT by JOHN ADAMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
Read the referenced article. There actually wasn't all that much more too it except this guy pled guilty. He'd been engaged in a back and forth with emails with folks at the mosque.

If he'd used a lawyer he'd walked and maybe got a big piece of the mosque for that matter ~ they do bear some responsibility for what they had to say PLUS they have the entire burden of accepting responsibility for the threats and intimidation in the Koran ~ or, I suppose, you could have a bunch of Moslems go into federal court and repudiate the Koran (which would be a real laugh riot).

I don't see the threat ~ the judge should have demanded this puke get a lawyer ~ it's not too late for a civil suit.

9 posted on 11/05/2010 10:10:14 AM PDT by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

My only question is why the federal DoJ was involved, rather than a state legal entity. I know there is a reasonable answer to this question, but initially it seems to me that it should have been handled by the state first.


10 posted on 11/05/2010 10:27:27 AM PDT by HushTX (Yep. It's confirmed. Liberals are all idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

One year in the slammer for one email.

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


11 posted on 11/05/2010 10:53:10 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

On, please.


12 posted on 11/05/2010 11:06:38 AM PDT by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I like that picture.


13 posted on 11/05/2010 11:15:19 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Agreed. There’s got to be more!??!


14 posted on 11/05/2010 11:44:44 AM PDT by griswold3 (Employment is off-shored, away from govt. regulations, price pressure groups, and liabilities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HushTX
Communication by wire, etc. ~ you use the internet it's assumed you are engaging in interstate communication.

if he was standing outside shouting at the Imam that calumny was coming down on his head, that might have stirred state law enforcement.

As it is this isn't much of a threat ~ more of an ill-worded prophetic prediction.

That's why we all get the queasy feeling that this puke was railroaded ~ and the judge should not have allowed that.

It's not that the guy was involved in "hate speech" ~ more like he committed that ultimate crime of "bad grammar". Wouldn't even have taken a good lawyer to get him off.

15 posted on 11/05/2010 3:38:53 PM PDT by muawiyah (GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks combat_boots.


16 posted on 11/05/2010 5:17:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson