Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Upton, Thomas Edison and Michigan
jennerationx.com ^ | 11/13/10 | Jen Kuznicki

Posted on 11/13/2010 6:36:10 AM PST by jenk

Congressman Fred Upton has been receiving harsh criticism of his quest to become chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The Republican has co-sponsored a bill with a liberal Democrat to ban the incandescent light bulb, which was originally made available to the masses by Thomas Edison, because, in Upton’s view, it uses too much energy. Upton believes we, as a society, must focus on energy savings since our energy needs will double in a certain time frame due to a study done by God knows who, and paid for probably by a green group.

Upton argued that only 10% of the “obsolete” incandescent energy use was light, and 90% was heat, making the fluorescent a more efficient bulb.

So he introduced a bill to ban Edison’s lightbulb by 2012.

Thomas Edison was a genius. He moved to Port Huron as a child, and frustrated teachers by his constant question of “why?” His mother knew he was not “addled” as his teacher said, she knew he was gifted. She took him home, taught him herself, and he began a business distributing newspapers, snacks and candy that was so successful, he branched out by selling fruits and vegetables. By 14, the boy was campaigning for Abraham Lincoln, the father of the Republican Party. He started his own newspaper, outlining the Lincoln-Douglas debates and was making 10 dollars a day, enough at the time to live comfortably on his own. But he instead used his extra money to finance his chemical lab.

One of his first inventions was the electric vote-recording machine, which was rejected because lobbyists liked to be able to coerce members of the legislature away from their instinctive vote in the Massachusetts legislature during a long, drawn out manual counting of votes.

(Excerpt) Read more at jennerationx.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: congress; edison; energy; fredupton; michigan; thomasedison; upton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Repeal the ban on incandescents.
1 posted on 11/13/2010 6:36:14 AM PST by jenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jenk; Clive; scripter; Darnright; WL-law; bamahead; carolinablonde; SolitaryMan; rdl6989; livius; ..
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 11/13/2010 6:40:19 AM PST by steelyourfaith (ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jenk

joe miller...300 incidents of fraud...
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/13/lawyers-depart-alaska-as-millers-chances-dim/?hp


3 posted on 11/13/2010 6:40:21 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jenk
"A German businessman is getting around a law banning incandescent bulbs by selling them as "Heat Balls". Mon, Oct 25 2010 at 11:35 AM EST

A light bulb Photo: James Bowe/Flickr You gotta hand it to German businessman Siegfried Rotthaeuser, who came up with a brilliant run around the European Union ban on conventional incandescent light bulbs- he rebranded them as "Heat Balls" and is importing them for sale as a "small heating device".

Rotthaeuser's website is in German but Google does a passable job of translation. First, he's very clear that the Heat Ball isn't for lighting, stating (in German, the following is translated) "A HEAT BALL ® is not a lamp, but it fits in the same version!"

Further down: "The use of Heat Balls avoids the lack of heat. The intended use of heat Balls is the heating. "

The funny thing about this is that incandescent bulbs are fairly efficient when they are used as heaters, throwing off around 95% of the energy they draw as heat. In colder climates, using the bulbs for lighting isn't always an inefficient choice as the bulbs add to the warmth of the home. "

4 posted on 11/13/2010 6:48:22 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jenk
Screw the ban, or a repeal.

The production lines are already moved or moving to china. They are not coming back here.

Soon, an incadesecent bulb will be as hard to get as cocaine.

I have a shitload of them, obtained for free. More than I will ever need. Just waiting for the market to stabilize before my price is set.

Same thing happened with crappers. Had some of them too, but all sold out now.

Those who let the federals define the basic premise of their living standard deserve to live in the dark and scrape their own $hit off the floor.

5 posted on 11/13/2010 6:49:50 AM PST by mmercier (disobedient individualism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

I’ve been stockpiling them for my own use.

I will have to replace my ceiling fixtures if I have to use the new ones. The globes won’t fit back on some of them with the new design. I hate them.

Why does govt have to take every good idea and f it up???


6 posted on 11/13/2010 7:01:13 AM PST by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy; mmercier

I have roomfull mainly scooped at a Home Depot sale for 10ç apiece. I’m thinking we should get together and fix the eventual price . . .


7 posted on 11/13/2010 7:07:05 AM PST by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jenk

I haven’t been a fan of Edison since I read how he treated Nikola Tesla. It’s just a freakin’ light bulb, and a very inefficient one at that. Let the incandescent die in history with Edison.


8 posted on 11/13/2010 7:23:02 AM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jenk

I agree with you but Thomas Alva Edison should have been much kinder to Nicola Tesla and paid him the $50,000.00


9 posted on 11/13/2010 7:45:54 AM PST by Mrs.ThurstonHowell (Amendment 25 Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative

Who cares what you think.


10 posted on 11/13/2010 7:46:52 AM PST by jenk (Thomas Edison was a genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Mrs.ThurstonHowell

does that have anything to do with what i wrote? no I was careful not to say he invented it, Okay?


12 posted on 11/13/2010 7:51:51 AM PST by jenk (Thomas Edison was a genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jenk
>Upton argued that only 10% of the “obsolete” incandescent energy use was light, and 90% was heat, making the fluorescent a more efficient bulb.

So he introduced a bill to ban Edison’s lightbulb by 2012.<

This is the most lamebrained ban with which these imbeciles have come up yet. Ban the incandescent, and in its place, put this:

Yep, makes sense to me. After all, everyone knows that halogen bulbs produce no appreciable heat. < /S>

13 posted on 11/13/2010 7:54:06 AM PST by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PDMiller

Right back at you!


14 posted on 11/13/2010 7:54:23 AM PST by jenk (Thomas Edison was a genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

Yep, we’ll be the incandescent light bulb magnates of the 21st century!! And here I was worried about not having any investments to see me through the coming hard times!!


15 posted on 11/13/2010 8:03:24 AM PST by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jenk

I’m so sorry, I deeply apologize for having offended you with my mis-directed comment.


16 posted on 11/13/2010 8:16:00 AM PST by Mrs.ThurstonHowell (Amendment 25 Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative
It’s just a freakin’ light bulb, and a very inefficient one at that. Let the incandescent die in history with Edison.

Your right to make a decision should not affect my right to decide as I see fit.

I want these light bulbs. They have their place just as fluorescent bulbs do. And it is my decision, not yours or the governments.

Oh yes, I like Edison and I like Tesla. But that has nothing to do with allowing the government to make decisions as mundane as what kind of "a freakin' lightbulb" I purchase for my own personal use. Central control keeps creeping along. We need to draw a line in the sand.

17 posted on 11/13/2010 8:20:13 AM PST by SteamShovel (UTOPIA...Isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jenk
Repeal the ban on incandescents.

Bump

18 posted on 11/13/2010 8:24:38 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.ThurstonHowell

No problem.


19 posted on 11/13/2010 8:28:47 AM PST by jenk (Thomas Edison was a genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

exactly.


20 posted on 11/13/2010 8:29:55 AM PST by jenk (Thomas Edison was a genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson