To: scottfactor
read the book “One Second After”
2 posted on
12/02/2010 6:01:40 AM PST by
vanilla swirl
(We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
To: scottfactor
How did we ever get over the thousands of nuclear explosions, many hundred of which were high altitude, from the late 40s until the 80s?! EMP is overhyped, unless it bursts overhead;)
3 posted on
12/02/2010 6:02:34 AM PST by
DCBryan1
(FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
To: scottfactor
If you want a good book to read on the matter, read “One Second After”. It’s fiction. The author did get the science right, though as he had the author of the US Army’s manual on EMP Effects assist him; apparently they know each other. He tells a rather plausible tale of what would happen in the US after the fact. It’s an enjoyable action yarn, to boot.
4 posted on
12/02/2010 6:03:16 AM PST by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: scottfactor
I think EMP is overrated, the Navy did test cars and trucks made from the mid 1980's to today and although the EMP shut the cars down, almost all the cars will start up again. Some cars/trucks did have some issues where the gauges in the dashboard did not work or were going crazy, but they were still driveable. I'd say your odds of your car starting again will be 90% to 95%. Your transistor radio should still work if the antenna is folded as well. However, I do see where EMP can hurt the power grid, so there goes the ability to pump gas unless you have a generator, a 12 volt pump or a hand pump.
EMP ain't the 800 lbs gorilla they make it out to be, more like a 500 lbs one, although they are right on with the effects to the economy.
6 posted on
12/02/2010 6:07:58 AM PST by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
To: scottfactor
Geez I am as sick of these threads as I am “I want to buy gun”ones. IT IS WAAY OVERHYPED!!!!
8 posted on
12/02/2010 6:15:36 AM PST by
mad_as_he$$
(V for Vendetta.)
To: scottfactor
“Regardless, the Heritage EMP report advises swift action now to prevent the threat of EMP attacks.”
We currently prevent EMP attacks by assuring the nuclear destruction of any country that launches one against us.
9 posted on
12/02/2010 6:16:03 AM PST by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: scottfactor
Wouldn’t a massive solar flare while the magnetosphere was weak (say during a polar shift) do pretty much the same thing?
To: scottfactor
An EMP attack will have us partying like it was 1899!!!
(Over-hyped)
To: scottfactor
So repair or replace the broken stuff. But first, use the neutron bomb on the rag head country that did it and use their oil to pay for it all.
18 posted on
12/02/2010 6:34:50 AM PST by
coon2000
(Give me Liberty or give me death!)
To: scottfactor
Poor NYC, out of power for one day. Houston was out of power for 2 weeks over most of the city and 3 weeks in some places and we didn't become animals in the dark. At least most of us didn't.
As far as this nuclear attack I pray to God it doesn't happen, those NYers would fan out across the country. (Just kidding ya’ll)
20 posted on
12/02/2010 6:47:44 AM PST by
Ditter
To: scottfactor
It’s funny how so many “know-it-alls” are here hollering “overhyped!!!”
How the hell do any of you know what you’re talking about when you’ve never seen this happen?
21 posted on
12/02/2010 6:50:53 AM PST by
WXRGina
To: scottfactor
27 posted on
12/02/2010 7:12:49 AM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: scottfactor
30 posted on
12/02/2010 7:16:38 AM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: scottfactor; All
Can EMP be turned into a focused weapon, such as that may be deployed from a plane, drone or parachute over lower altitude? Or does it require ionization in the lower atmosphere? I have seen “EMP” devices exploded by Hollywood, in “24” (@ “McClennan-Forrester” HQ) and also “Ocean’s Eleven” (takes out Las Vegas’ electric grid for a few minutes). Are those portrayals scientifically accurate or possible?
34 posted on
12/02/2010 7:47:30 AM PST by
montag813
(http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
To: scottfactor
Overblown chicken-little-ism and outright paranoid fantasy especially in the hysterical retelling of what happened in NYC blackout of 1977.
The George Mason U site hosts a better retelling, see: http://blackout.gmu.edu/events/tl1977.html
What must be recollected is that Harlem and the Bronx in 1977 were in the pits BEFORE the blackout, and that reactions in those neighborhoods were colored by the great urban race riots of the late sixties and early seventies. The social dynamic is not the same today.
Note that the great majority of NYC neighborhoods in the blackout were tranquil and orderly. And that AFTER the blackout the city as a whole was motivated and acted with motivation and effect to improve its situation.
I also hold that the impact of EMP is way overestimated. I speak from experience with systems highly exposed to lightning, and other systems where EMP pulses were part of the process.
41 posted on
12/02/2010 8:41:34 AM PST by
bvw
To: scottfactor
Not even a global humanitarian effort would be enough to keep hundreds of millions of Americans from death by starvation, exposure, or lack of medicine. So, everybody dies...hysterical anyone?
43 posted on
12/02/2010 8:57:10 AM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(We conservatives will always lose elections as long as we allow the MSM to choose our candidates.)
To: scottfactor
Windoze users will be used to it. Just reinstall (where’s that system disk?), and reboot . . AGAIN
46 posted on
12/02/2010 9:05:54 AM PST by
freedomlover
(Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson