Posted on 12/08/2010 2:23:42 PM PST by harygarfield
As far back as December 2009 President Obama has been preparing for a civil war within the United States. In November of 2009 he directed USNORTHCOM to make sure that there are at least 1 million troops inside the US by Jan 2010 while still continuing conflicts abroad. It makes sense why he's ending both Iraq and Afghanistan so early. Currently the military is participating in Unified Quest 2011 where they are preparing strategies on how to deal with a financial local or global collapse or if there are huge slashes in the budget. Considering earlier last month Berkeley students almost beat a police officer to death because of talks about raising tuition at a state ran school, I would expect with the incoming freshman to Congress that the same types of rioting on a more massive scale will be happening.
(Excerpt) Read more at hegrins.blogspot.com ...
ping
Rule #1
Shoot them before they shoot you !
At the very least, In Before The FEMA Camps Discussed.
Although I believe CWII will happen, I don't think the US Military will be the aggressor.
See tagline.
Yippie
Has the author never heard of the late 1960s? Methinks he's naive and or hysterical.
Ping for later
IBTZ +1
ping
Why should I listen to a guy who was homeless for years?
Crawl space with 2 lines of cinder blocks spaced 1 foot apart. A single window to lay my browning in (30-inch goose barrel) and a 1911 to back-up while I’m reloading the semi-auto.
Fully planned and expecting a grenade to get me out.
There cannot be a civil war unless the armed forces split.
There can be a zombie apocalypse (my personal bet).
There can be futile rebellious gestures, crushed by real soldiers and marines.
But to have CWII, you have to divide the chain of command and split the officer corps, so both sides believe they are doing right and are willing to order men to their deaths to prevail.
This is more of a possibility than many believe. The Supremacy Clause, and treason among the members of the ruling class, make a split over the legality of orders from the C-in-C a real possibility.
But, as of now, it isn't very likely, IMO.
Do watch out for zombies, however. THAT is the real danger.
Their oath is to the CONSTITUTION, not to any man or Administration.
Their oath is to the CONSTITUTION, not to any man or Administration.
Correct.
And when the President (a constitutional officer) signs a treaty, which is then ratified by the Senate (as described in the constitution), which the constitution calls "the Supreme Law of the Land", and that treaty violates the constitution or attempts to alter it, what is the right thing for a commissioned officer to do?
This BS seems to emerge on a continuing basis.
Now, if the term "martial law" means dictatorship, that''s another matter.
They can’t. Drop a million troops into this country and they will disappear like they never existed. They’ll be outnumbered 10,000 to 1. The logistics is impossible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.