>>“Mother had been refused entry to airplanes due to her 9 month pregnancy.”
>
>How’d she get there, then?
She could have gone to Africa by plane at 3- or 6-months pregnant... or perhaps gotten pregnant IN Africa. The state “9-months pregnant” is not exactly a constant state, which I’m sure most women who have given birth are thankful for, and it is not unusual for people to have taken trips of multiple months.
As my kids say,
Duh.
How could this OBOT be so dense ?
Oh, wait.
“As my kids say,
Duh.”
An explanation with language as garbled as “the state ‘9-months pregnant’ is not exactly a constant state” hardly deserves a “duh.” Let us just say point settled. I was wrong to quote the 9 months part, anyway. That’s not the real issue, as it could be explained that her being excessively pregnant kept her from leaving rather than coming.
My fundamental question remains unanswered. So far as I understand the timeline, she has to go to Africa some time between being a couple months pregnant (based on getting married in Hawaii) and giving birth. When did she go? Where’s the evidence she did?
By the way, if she was refused travel due to an advanced state of pregnancy, why did she want to leave? Perhaps to have the child back home? If that’s the case, why go to Africa in the first place?
Remember, according to Obots, airplanes, jet planes were not invented until the 70s... Sarcasm