Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Gov. Perry fast tracks pre-abortion sonogram requirement
American Thinker ^ | 1/23/11 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 01/24/2011 2:09:23 AM PST by upsdriver

Speaking to a pro-life rally in Austin on the anniversary of Roe v Wade yeste3rday, Texas Governor Rick Perry made a promise. Chuck Lindell of the Austin American-Statesman reports:Receiving the day's loudest and longest applause from thousands rallying against abortion, Gov. Rick Perry announced Saturday that he will designate as emergency legislation a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to first receive a sonogram of the fetus.Viewing an image from the womb and listening to the sound of the heartbeat - also required under the legislation - would ensure that each woman... (Read Full Article)

(Excerpt) Read more at comments.americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; rickperry; texas
A good move, IMO.
1 posted on 01/24/2011 2:09:27 AM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Agreed.


2 posted on 01/24/2011 2:14:07 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

A good move and a smart move.


3 posted on 01/24/2011 3:07:19 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Gov. Rick Perry announced Saturday that he will designate as emergency legislation a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to first receive a sonogram of the fetus.

Took guts.


4 posted on 01/24/2011 3:38:07 AM PST by IH8DEMS (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Isn’t this the law in some states already? It needs to be the law in every state. Watch out for exploding liberal heads though. IMHO it’s a simple matter of informed consent. If the need/desire for an abortion is so thin that it can’t withstand knowing exactly what’s going to happen to the fetus then it’s probably without merit.


5 posted on 01/24/2011 4:34:40 AM PST by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr; All

I’m not sure. Anyone know?


6 posted on 01/24/2011 8:53:29 AM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson