Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Do Some Conservatives Still Assume Obama and the Left Are Acting in Good Faith?
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 03/16/2011 2:54:18 PM PDT by Michael van der Galien

Why is it so difficult for some conservatives to accept the idea that the left is hellbent on destroying America as we know it? It’s not like it’s a far-out conspiracy theory. It’s a well documented ongoing process. These people have been at it for decades. The Cloward-Piven Strategy, which is one piece of the subversive puzzle, is real. We’ve proven it here at NewsReal and I’ve proven it in my upcoming book Subversion Inc. Since the culturally catastrophic 1960s elements within the left have been more or less open about their movement’s desire to overthrow the American system of government and capitalism it’s not a secret. Read a Noam Chomsky book –if you can do so without throwing up– and feel the anti-American venom leap right off the page and splash you in the face.

Yet Bill O’Reilly and the more libertarian John Stossel don’t think that malice lurks in the hearts of American leftists. Courtesy of my favorite clipping service, Media Matters for America (their motto might as well be “We clip everything cool that conservatives say on TV and radio.”), here’s a discussion O’Reilly and Stossel had on Fox News last night:

In the clip above O’Reilly bashes conservative talk radio for accusing the left of malice and Stossel just shrugs and says leftists just like spending other people’s money too much. Move on: Nothing to see here, folks. Why the assumption of good faith? Are they afraid to call out people who hate America because it might be impolite? Is it Polite Company Conservative syndrome? (See a great piece by the coiner of the phrase Tunku Varadarajan.)

A more egregious offender is Michael Medved who stridently denounces his fellow conservatives for questioning the intentions of leftists.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bhofascism; democrats; liberalfascism; obama; ogrifter; oreilly; stossel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Michael van der Galien

Republican politicians spend way too much time being nice to the other side.


21 posted on 03/16/2011 3:27:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

I’ve met a few liberals who were ‘in the know’ - but for the most part they’re clueless. Which is kind of comforting for me. In a real crunch - some of them would flip to our side.


22 posted on 03/16/2011 3:31:55 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

Because it’s the Stupid Party.


23 posted on 03/16/2011 3:32:07 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Bill O’Reilly is NOT a conservative

AGREED.... he’s a “plays both sides” blowhard.


24 posted on 03/16/2011 3:32:45 PM PDT by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

why would anybody think that Republicans (socialists) are acting in good faith? You know the liberal hates American and is against you. The Republican (socialist) will say he is with you, then back stab you and implement the Democrats (communists) policies. Who are you more foolish believing?

The Big Boo


25 posted on 03/16/2011 4:15:59 PM PDT by The Big Boo (Lone Wolf M/C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Why use Bill O’Reilly as an example? ;’) Thanks Michael van der Galien.


26 posted on 03/16/2011 4:35:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

“Why Do Some Conservatives ...”

“Yet Bill O’Reilly and the more libertarian John Stossel...’

It would be nice if Horowitz actually mentioned some conservatives in his article. I like the guy, but you think, having been a leftist, he would realize that O’Reilly is a moderate liberal and Stossel a socially liberal libertarian, neither of which qualifies one as being a conservative.


27 posted on 03/16/2011 4:45:37 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
I love it yesterday when Levin referred to bill o'reilly, AKA: 'The leprechaun' as "the FOX 8:00 o'clock guy". Mark was talking about how O'Reilly is such a kiss-up to Obama in hopes of getting more appearances on his show where he can kiss Obama's ass some more and generate more money for himself. But I guess those two Irish guys Obama and O'reilly stick together.
28 posted on 03/23/2011 7:54:06 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson