Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin Was Chosen By John McCain? To Enable Washington To Launch A Four Year Smear Attack
March 2, 2011 | PRV

Posted on 03/23/2011 1:23:52 PM PDT by USSR Didnt Fall

Over the past couple of years people continue to scratch their heads on why Sarah Palin, a true Conservative was chosen by the Washington establishment insider John McCain as his running mate.

Sarah Palin was far and away the most popular Governor in America, as her approval ratings in Alaska approached the 80% range.

After working for the McCain/Palin ticket on the local level, I could see immediately that other than Palin and a few advisors the majority of the team was satisfied in handing the presidency over to a known radical.

Many in the McCain camp were more concerned with undermining and trashing Palin then keeping a known Marxist out of the White House.

The answer is clear to me that the socialist, Marxist and globalist chose Palin for the sole reason to begin a four year crusade to undermine her character and smear her to the point that she would become unelectable for higher office.

This is why the inside the beltway Republicans(Krauthammer), the same people who were so impressed with Obama's souring speeches at the same time sitting silent about his associations and to this day his destructive policies choose to launch continued ad hominem attacks against her.

At the same time the Bush administration handed Obama the keys to dismantling our capitalist system.

How dumb do they think we are?

The likes of Rove and the boys knew more about Obama than any Hannity watcher could ever know.

Yet we are made to believe by many on our side that Bush was protecting the free market by using TARP funds as a bridge loan for the next administration to begin taking over industry after industry in line with Marx's goal.

All you heard about was a seemless transition but nothing about how the past administration was putting up fire walls to a man who they knew was looking to further centralize power. No, they helped empower him.

In addition giving the treasury dictatorial powers in the name of stabilizing the economy. (Geithner, Kissinger, Obama, Bush Connection)

People have no concept that globalism, international bureaucracy and world socialism run both parties in Washington DC.

Predictably the Republican leadership has done very little to stop Obamacare and his agenda. In fact just as in Sarah Palin's case they continue to target the Conservative majority which handed them a historic victory this past November.

So yes, Sarah Palin was chosen by the Washington insiders, which opened the doors to chip away at her character for four years instead of two.

Obama, Bush,McCain and the internationlists could not allow a Conservative(Palin) to spoil their plans of global governance and revitalized focus on American sovereignty, religious faith, states rights and individualism.

Remember Henry Kissinger (NWO advocate) was the one that elevated Bush 41 to power in the late 70's and early 80's. Along with him you have the likes of Baker, Scowcroft,Gingrich, Ealgeburger, Powell, Rice and Geithner to name a few who were influenced or worked under Kissinger.

While people like myself wrongly defended Bush for 8 years, using a second grade mentality of if the enemy attacks(media) it must be because that politician is opposed to their ideology.

But clearly in this case, it was a tactic to get conservatives to stand by as Bush took the country further and further left redefining the parameters of right and left.

This is why Gingrich , Romney both Rockefeller Republicans (globalist) will most likely lay down to Obama just as McCain did if they are nominated by ill informed Republicans and Conservatives.

The mission for the Republican party is not to defeat Obama, his policies including Obamacare but to make sure that someone like Sarah Palin in no way disrupts this global transformation that has been the focus of the last 4 presidents and congressional leadership over that time.

Sarah Palin was chosen to tear her down which is why in the face of all the attacks McCain sat silent, and has come out on the face of a president that is intentionally destroying the country and said that he will not support a Republican candidate in 2012.

There you have it folks, people can laugh and ridicule Palin, but in the end America needs a person who fights for the American people not faceless bureaucrats that make up this global socialism that is on the verge of dismantling our economy.

If you want some straight talk, Obama, Clinton, Bush 41, Bush 43 are far more similiar than you would think.

I encourage you all to do your own research and you will see how someone like Sarah Palin is the main enemy to these administrations because she stands with the American people not with the interantional buraucracies that wish to bring America to her knees.

In the end we all lose if we don't see through the scam that is going on in Washington.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bringthestraitjacket; conspiracy; imisspissant; littlegreenmen; notsane; palin; palinistasoncrack; palinmoonbat; paranoia; paranoidpalinistas; psycho; rockhudsonwasnotgay; sarahpalin; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: COgamer
“The answer is clear to me that the socialist, Marxist and globalist chose Palin for the sole reason to begin a four year crusade to undermine her character and smear her to the point that she would become unelectable for higher office.”

That sounds Birchy.

41 posted on 03/24/2011 1:54:43 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
I actually thought about including that, but decided to only list the qualities that McCain completely lacked. And no, John McCain is not completely lacking in conservative credentials.
42 posted on 03/24/2011 2:51:33 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Melas

>Yep, I’m pretty damned certain that an aging McCain picked the attractive, young, energetic, charismatic governor because she was...well...young, attractive, energetic, and charismatic.

Don’t forget conservative too. :-)


43 posted on 03/24/2011 3:29:10 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (Obama - Osama - the only difference is "BS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Melas

>I actually thought about including that, but decided to only list the qualities that McCain completely lacked. And no, John McCain is not completely lacking in conservative credentials.

True that, my friend.


44 posted on 03/24/2011 4:16:18 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (Obama - Osama - the only difference is "BS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: USSR Didnt Fall
How dumb do they think we are?

No comment.

45 posted on 03/24/2011 4:58:12 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
"So your point is that an ambitious man like John McCain:

1.) Who had been seeking the Presidency of the United States for many years .

2.) Who would have considered the Presidency as the crowning glory of his family tree ....

.... Shot his Presidential ambitions in the foot and picked a woman that very few people outside of Alaska had ever heard of before just to "undermine the conservative movement"?"


It does not appear to be the most rational argument ever constructed.




That Sarah Palin was such an obviously flawed candidate that picking that unknown woman would have "undermined the conservative movement"?


The fact that she would be such an easy target, who could be used to discredit the conservative movement, was not as obvious that early.
46 posted on 03/24/2011 5:20:46 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Believe it or not, a friend and I have devised a method to eliminate some of these candidates based on who are their supporters.

So far we've eliminated Palin, Huckabee and Paul because they have the looniest supporters.

This thread is proof our method has validity. Palin deserves better than this. Her supporters are her worst enemies.

47 posted on 03/24/2011 5:36:13 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

What depth and insight, thanks.....

Cheers


48 posted on 03/26/2011 6:34:59 PM PDT by USSR Didnt Fall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson