Posted on 04/07/2011 8:30:52 PM PDT by llandres
Fact - The natural born citizenship clause of the Constitution requires both parents to be American citizens at the time of a child’s birth in order for that child to be eligible for the Presidency. Mr. Obama has already admitted that at birth he had dual citizenship from his father, a British subject, and his mother, an American citizen. This is irrespective of birth place. A dual citizens’ allegiance is inherently divided. The Constitution requires singular allegiance to the United States at birth.
Fact - Mr. Obama admits he was adopted by an Indonesian national and became an Indonesian citizen in order to attend school there. No record exists as to whether Mr. Obama renounced this Indonesian citizenship or was naturalized as an American citizen when he returned to the United States. Even if he did renounce his Indonesian citizenship, Mr. Obama fails the singular allegiance test of the Constitution as a result of his dual allegiance at birth. As further disqualification then, Mr. Obama has multiple citizenships: British, Kenyan, Indonesian, with his American citizenship confirmed as soon as he releases his naturalization papers. The Constitution requires singular allegiance to the United States. A Citizen of the United States by naturalization is not a natural born citizen
(Excerpt) Read more at drkatesview.wordpress.com ...
but having the first black president is so kewl!
Obama is teh awesome! Questioning his eligibility is racist!!!!! /s
And that doesn't even touch on woefully unqualified.
Bill Clinton put an indelible stain on the presidency.
The election of Barack Obama with not just none of the customary vetting done, but vetting BLOCKED AND DISALLOWED by the journalistic community charged with providing that service to the American public has made of mockery of the office of POTUS.
I think obama should be happy. The last time there was an Oreo in the White House Amy Carter ate it.
What really pisses me off is Bill the Ego and Beck. They’ve got more money than their grandkids will ever be able to spend so why are they so in the tank with obama on this issue? Is there something the government has on them or are do they love money more than the country that gave them the opportunity to earn that money?
All together now: “You have no standing, you have no standing, nah-nah-nah-boo-hoo!”
The sooner people realize that O'Reilly and Beck are conservatives-lite, at best, the sooner we can move on as a nation.
.
The facts re; BC fraud, not natural born citizen:
How to reach Trump:
http://shouldtrumprun.com/
http://shouldtrumprun.com/your-voices/
http://shouldtrumprun.com/contact-us/
Herman Cain
.
I can’t figure out that out either..
To me the questions are obvious
1. Why is he trying to hide his B.C.?
2. How can he be natural born with a (supposed) father who was a citizen of another country
3. Should a POTUS even be allowed to hide his B.C.?
Why are so many in the media acting like these are ridiculous questions??? I don’t get it.
It may be something to do with their children or family members and nothing to do about money. Zero and his gang are extremely evil and there is so much bodyguards can do.....just saying....
The “2 citizen parent” requirement is NOT a “fact”, it is a theory which has never been adopted by the US Code or by any court in a way to serve as binding precedent.
....Yeah...and send it to RUSH L...Mr “99.6% right on the EIB Network” who needs some education in this matter.
When one prints something and calls it fact, they better have documented proof to it back it up. I like DrKate, but she crossed the “FACT” line when she said Obama, himself, said he was adopted by Soetoro. Documents such as the divorce papers & SADOS’s passport records suggest this happened, but NEVER has Obama publicly admitted to this. A sorry link to a brief article at TWCFJ pertaining to Obama’s mother's passport posted by someone who goes by CALEB IS NOT proof of this fact. Furthermore...
“A child can not be held responsible for their parents actions, but the actions of the child when they become an adult do”
Shame, Shame, Shame on Kate for spreading this lie. Don't we have enough on our hands just dealing with the truth, that the man is not constitutionally qualified to be in the office? Are we now so desperate that we have to resort to lies?
If I am wrong, point me to Obama's direct quote stating in public that he was adopted & then I will whole heartily publicly apologize for calling Kate a liar.
Bingo!! And, while you’re at it, tell the Washington Post also.
Please note re: “The natural born citizenship clause of the Constitution requires both parents to be American citizens at the time of a child’s birth in order for that child to be eligible for the Presidency.” Where does the CONSTITUTION say that?
Secondly, Obama cannot be a victim of his adoptive father's actions. IF Obama is a natural born citizen (and I have reason to believe he IS NOT) an action by an adoptive father could not deprive hm of that birthright.
Again, I am not saying Obama is legally qualified, but the first two stated facts are incorrect.
Sorry.
Speaking for the "unbiased" media such as Oreilly and Beck and others we like more who are much more unbiased than the two names mentioned.
The answer is:
1) They do not understand the diffence between native born and natural born or even if it does make a difference.
or
2) They assume a birth certificate is the document we are all familiar with (without parents info) and they do not know what a long version is.
or
3) They do suspect something but figure "hey, what the heck. He's President now. Just let it ride"
This birthler stuff makes me go wild. Don’t we have something better to do instead of this tin foil hat like issue ? Something like winning the next election for the GOP ?
1. Why is he trying to hide his B.C.?
Did he hide it ? He only didn’t show it doesn’t mean he’s hiding it. Maybe he or his mum simply lost it on one of their moves around the world.
2. How can he be natural born with a (supposed) father who was a citizen of another country
His mother was american, he (might) have been born on US soil, so what ? Does that mean that EVERY child of a american single mom who’s dady is unknown is UNEGLIBLE ?
3. Should a POTUS even be allowed to hide his B.C.?
NO. He should at least show up a certified copy as he did.
And copy does not mean “photo” copy but a “literal” copy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.