Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama 1997 Finals Question- Help Two People Legally Clone a Human
Pundit Press ^ | 4/26/11 | Aurelius

Posted on 04/26/2011 6:38:26 AM PDT by rightistight

In 1997, Barack Obama was a "Senior Lecturer" at the University of Chicago Law School. On December 13, 1997, Professor Obama administered a final exam to his law students... The first question: help a married couple clone their only daughter.

The scene is set by then-Professor Obama thusly: Mary and Joseph are middle-aged parents. Their daughter, Dolly, was in a horrible car accident, after which she entered a "vegetative state." After discussing the issue, and faced with a "void," her parents have decided to clone her, even though the will that Dolly had left is vague about what she wanted after death.

Her parents also say that they heard her talk about cloning at least once and that they would like to use that as evidence that Dolly would have liked to be cloned. However, they live in the imaginary state of "Futura," which is one of the few states that has banned cloning.

You are Mary and Joseph's lawyer. You might expect such a complex question to allow the student to argue whether it is legal/constitutional, using evidence of their choice. But no. Your job is to help them clone their daughter, period.

The first question is decidedly vague: as their lawyer, you need to tell Mary and Joseph whether their "rights" are being violated if they are not allowed to clone their daughter. Professor Obama stresses that students "do not need to arrive at a definitive conclusion." However, he states that students should "consider" that a ban on cloning "does in fact encroach on some constitutionally recognized rights," but that the ban is "possibly" constitutional anyway.

(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bho44; cloning; obama

1 posted on 04/26/2011 6:38:29 AM PDT by rightistight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightistight

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2710217/posts


2 posted on 04/26/2011 6:40:13 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Mary and Joseph? Really? What a dolt.


3 posted on 04/26/2011 6:41:11 AM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Strange that someone who strongly advocates abortion, would also support cloning humans.


4 posted on 04/26/2011 6:44:37 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Morally repugnant!! Any law professor who asks his class to defend or propagate a morally repugnant idea is one who sees moral standards as obstacles. Yes folks, this is the end of America...


5 posted on 04/26/2011 6:48:16 AM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Does anyone really believe Barry wrote this question? I wonder how often he even showed up to “lecture”...


6 posted on 04/26/2011 6:56:35 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Chuck Schumer: You are a rude, pompous ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight
I'd be curious to hear Obama’s answers to his own questions. Would he argue that a person is entitled to clone themselves because they have a right to control their own genetic material? If so, why does a person have this right? And if that is the case, what gives a mother the right to destroy the genetic material of her own child since that genetic material is unique from the mother's? Doesn't the child have the right to control it's own genetic material?
7 posted on 04/26/2011 7:19:54 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
" However, he states that students should "consider" that a ban on cloning "does in fact encroach on some constitutionally recognized rights," but that the ban is "possibly" constitutional anyway.

This is typical of Obama's reasoning. He takes both sides of an issue so he cannot be wrong!

8 posted on 04/26/2011 7:21:09 AM PDT by rocksblues (Obama, the biggest liar in the history of American politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Has anyone, anywhere said they took his class? lol


9 posted on 04/26/2011 7:41:35 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Chuck Schumer: You are a rude, pompous ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Is a Clone a Natural Born Citizen?


10 posted on 04/26/2011 7:47:49 AM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight
0 - "Law? What law? Why bother?

Do it anyway and lie about it afterward. You don't need no stinkin' law to tell you what you can and can't do.

That's what lawyers are for.

Only little people need laws."

11 posted on 04/26/2011 10:40:33 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (FDR had the New Deal. President 0bama has the Raw Deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Don't Let the Dragons Eat You


Give what you can
Or donate monthly, and a sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10

Lazamataz is hanging by a pixel!

12 posted on 04/26/2011 10:42:46 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson