Posted on 05/12/2011 4:26:24 PM PDT by PROCON
Mopping carbon dioxide directly from the sky costs too much be an economically viable way to mitigate global warming, a two-year study by 13 physicists has found (press release). One method, using reactive chemicals, would cost at least $600 to remove each tonne of CO2 from the air around eight times more pricey than capturing the gas from the industrial flue stacks of power plants, the report [pdf] concludes.
The study published by the American Physical Society on 9 May doesnt put a figure on the costs of innovative technologies from researchers and private companies who claim to be able to capture CO2 from air more cheaply.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.nature.com ...
And if that happened, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference either before or after the volcano.
This is a S C A M , it's about driving up your energy costs so that they can take your money and use it to enslave you to their agenda.
Americans have been trained to reject anything that sounds like a C O N S P I R A C Y . They immeidately think that can't be true, it's a theory.... Saying it another way, they think you are stupid enough to do nothing while they tighten the noose around your neck.
Mopping carbon dioxide directly from the sky costs too much and accomplishes absolutely nothing.
Course, now somebody is going to re-market the ShamWow into a
“carbon dioxide absorber”
LOL...the sad thing is, you're probably right...:=(
Semper Fi from an old Army guy!
Why not build big indoor green houses ne3xt to coal plants to grow hydroponic Tomatoes and other veggies and fruits?
That way we increase our food production capability and put that CO2 to good use! Plus we can use the excess power generated at the coal plant to run the lights in the green houses and the excess heat to keep the greenhouses warm in the winter.
The libs would never want to do this as it would increase the food supply and the eco-freaks think that would be bad because they want the population to decrease because they are all followers of Malthus.
Even if you did do such a thing they would probably just use the FDA to ban the food produced there based off some minuscule measurement of certain element from the smoke getting into the food at parts per billion or something, meanwhile toxic food from china will still be eagerly imported.
Libs seem to hate progress in all forms, how very “progressive” of them.....
NASA Gets Caught Faking Climate Change Data---Again!!
Gingrich Feels the Heat for Appearing in Global Warming Ad With Pelosi
Global Warming on Free Republic
See my #13. LOL
Scientists??? Why ?
Economists should have been on the team, scientists aren’t qualified to make these determinations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.