Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney vs Palin (Only Sarah Palin can Derail Mitt Romney)
pollinsider.com ^ | June 8, 2011 | techno

Posted on 06/08/2011 7:32:47 AM PDT by techno

...my official prediction is that Obama will be facing either Romney or Palin in 2012. IF PALIN DOES NOT END UP RUNNING, MITT ROMNEY WINS THE NOMINATION.

...If Palin runs as expected, it will be a close race to the finish between the two of them. So why is Palin the only one who can derail Romney?...When voters do not vote Palin...her support drifts to Romney more than anybody else. With Palin in the race, voters will be forced to decide whether to coalesce around one conservative candidate and win, or break apart into multiple factions and hand the nomination to Romney.

"...Palin has a much easier and possibly only, road to victory...she is also the natural beneficiary of conservative voters deciding to get behind one candidate. She is easily the most popular among VERY CONSERVATIVE voters, who are typically the most active at this stage, and Tea Party activists. Because Palin has the largest grassroots capabilities, the best ability to raise funds and has been the leading vocal opponent to Obama for the past 3 years, she is an easy, natural choice.

...Palin helps the entire non-Romney field by keeping Romney in the mid-teens in support and within a close distance to all of the candidates. By not running, she actually hurts the other candidates, and Romney benefits.

Can this change if Palin does not run? Can another candidate step up?

I don't think so. The clear fact is that none of the candidates will be able to raise enough money to take on Romney and will not be able to generate enough ground support to take him on. At this stage, you are down 15 points if Palin is not in. How can you catch up? Huckabee was unable to overcome the same problem in 2008...

(Excerpt) Read more at pollinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: albatrossromney; benedictromney; carpetbaggerromney; fascistromney; palin; politics; romney4iag; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; romney4tarp; romney4truthers; romney911mosque; romneybigdig; romneycare; romneydirtytricks; romneymanipulation; romneymarriage; romneytaxes; sarahpalin

1 posted on 06/08/2011 7:32:55 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: techno

The clear fact is that none of the candidates will be able to raise enough money to take on Romney ............................................................ If the Obamaists want Romney to run, I bet they will funnel $$$$ into his campaign to insure he gets the nomination. DC/Chicago politics for sure.


2 posted on 06/08/2011 7:37:51 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The storm clouds of war are on the horizon, 1939 is again approaching us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Romney vs Palin (Only Sarah Palin can Derail Mitt Romney)
________________________________________________________

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Romney isnot exactly speeding sown the tracks

Hes more like chugging along the side of an old broken line..

But can Gov Sarah Palin cow prod Romney out of the race ???

You betcha SHE CAN


3 posted on 06/08/2011 7:38:51 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Bottom line. I hope Sarah runs. I am not convinced that Romney would win if sarah does not run anyway. There are some strong candidates like Bachmann that is running which would derail Romney’s coronation. Oh some are disappointed in Rollins running Bachmann’s campaign but she is PRO-LIFE so I give her a big pass on his negatives. Hopefully he learned that dissing Sarah was the wrong thing to do. He should not say a word about Palin until she announces and then only talk about the differences between Palin and Bachmann’s policies ONLY. Rollin should not use his emotions to discuss Palin. Go Palin! Go Bachmann! Either one would be a proud decision for President in my opinion.


4 posted on 06/08/2011 7:39:40 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno
Mitt Romney has zero chance of getting the 2012 Republican party nomination. Conservatives want a real conservative this time. The MSM wants us to nominate Romney.

Ain't gonna happen.

Been there done that.

5 posted on 06/08/2011 7:39:54 AM PDT by wayoverontheright (The Democratic Party is trying to end "the private sector as we know it".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Romney derailed himself.. LOL Country Club RINO Mitt!


6 posted on 06/08/2011 7:42:32 AM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Romney can be defeated by pretty much the entire field.

Contrary to the leftist wet dream, Americans hate the socialized medicine fiasco more every day. No amount of MSM boosterism has dented that and its Mitt Romneycare’s baby as much as anyone’s.

Mitt was squashed and squashed hard in 2008 even before Obamacare made it national.

Mitt isn’t a presidential has been. He’s a never was and never will be.


7 posted on 06/08/2011 7:42:53 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Only Sarah Palin can Derail Mitt Romney

"No. There is another. Mitt Romney can derail Mitt Romney."

"Never get in your enemy's way when he is busy destroying himself."
- - Sun Tzu 'The Art of War'

8 posted on 06/08/2011 7:49:54 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Treat me good, I'll treat you better. Treat me bad, I'll treat you worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

this is nonsense.

Anything can happen and there are many candidates with a good shot at winning the primary. Romney is not going to win Iowa, so somebody may easily emerge from there (e.g. Pawlenty, maybe even Paul Ryan if he runs). Bachman may also be strong.

Things change quickly. In 2008 it looked like Rudy vs Hillary duel.


9 posted on 06/08/2011 7:54:31 AM PDT by heiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Somebody needs to post that picture from the front page of the New Hampshire paper of the day the Mittster announced: small article below the fold. Sarah's clambake dominates above the fold.

If Sarah gets in, Mitt may still win New Hampshire. They let Indies and other squisy people devoid of values vote. They also will get more than a few hard core Democrats declaring themselves Indies just to vote.

So give him New Hampshire (but not by much) as it will be all downhill from there.

10 posted on 06/08/2011 7:55:35 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
I wouldn't underestimate Romney, just as many of us underestimated McCain. When the Party Establishment is behind you, don't kid yourself. It's a tough mountain to move.

I don't see anyone stopping Romney other than Gov. Palin. I hope she sees things the same way.

11 posted on 06/08/2011 7:56:31 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: techno
THIRDPARTY
12 posted on 06/08/2011 7:58:34 AM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Heavy weight title match - Sarah and Mitt

Mitt the expected comfortable front runner (Hillary in 2008) and Sarah the insurgent (can I say that?) full of fire (ala Bambi in 2008)


13 posted on 06/08/2011 8:07:48 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

If we wanted Mitt we would have nominated him in 2008. He got beat out by the worst candidate in history, Juan McStain. It’s not going to be Mitt.


14 posted on 06/08/2011 8:08:50 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright; techno
Mitt Romney has zero chance of getting the 2012 Republican party nomination. Conservatives want a real conservative this time.

It certainly can happen if conservatives split their votes among 4 or 5 candidates and Romney comes up the middle.

So far the strategy is working perfectly while conservatives fight among themselves while the DC crowd laughs their a$$es off. It's working so perfectly that Mitt is going to take the summer off, raise even more money and prepare to execute the "last man standing" strategy. He and his backers are betting millions that it will work and it's not a bad bet the way I see it.

Just for the record, I despise Mitt Romney.

15 posted on 06/08/2011 8:12:14 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Does anybody remember what happened to Martha Coakley early in 2010?


16 posted on 06/08/2011 8:13:52 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: techno

Yes, but she was a terrible candidate.


17 posted on 06/08/2011 8:17:45 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

NO KIDDING! Mitt is a LOSER!


18 posted on 06/08/2011 8:18:29 AM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: techno

I’m reminded of William F. Buckley’s run for mayor of New York in 1965. He knew he wasn’t going to win, but entered the race to throw a wrench in John Lindsay’s career, who wanted to be mayor, then governor, then president. Lindsay did become mayor, but that’s as far as he went.

Romney is not a conservative and I hope she keeps throwing wrenches into his works.


19 posted on 06/08/2011 8:24:50 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

The point of the article is that Mitt Romney has the upper hand right now and if conservatives, evangelicals, and Tea Party supporters don’t give their heads a good shake, Mitt Romney is going to be the GOP nominee next year.

And it doesn’t matter how you feel about Romney personally or that you feel he is an inadequate candidate with major flaws.

Bottom line as the article says, you either vote for Sarah Palin next year or you’ll get Mitt Romney.

There is no other choice.


20 posted on 06/08/2011 8:28:21 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Why would Palin supporters drift to Romney?


21 posted on 06/08/2011 8:36:42 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Personally I wouldn’t, but there’s no accounting for 2nd choices.

One of the most overlooked polling statistics is that Palin does fairly well with moderates, although not near as well as Romney does.

In addition many Palin supporters are not going over to Cain or Bachmann because neither have any executive experience.


22 posted on 06/08/2011 8:44:36 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Sweet.


23 posted on 06/08/2011 8:52:37 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: techno

What morons are considering Romney, the RINO and lover of Socialized Medicine and believer in Climate Change? Rush exposed the RINO yesterday. Romney’s another McLame loser.


24 posted on 06/08/2011 8:59:15 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno
When voters do not vote Palin...her support drifts to Romney

Huh? This only makes sense if voters are only going on name recognition. Palin's the biggest name, if she's out the go to the next biggest name; no thought about issues.

I find it hard to believe that in this election year particularly, issues won't be front and center in voter's minds.

25 posted on 06/08/2011 9:21:15 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Herman Cain knows math, computers, pizza, money, hamburgers, banking, and Coca-Cola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

Hmmmmm...Palin or Obama lite...decisions, decisions, decisions! < /sarc >


26 posted on 06/08/2011 10:28:21 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno
Why don't you and the MSM just appoint Mitt Heir apparent since obviously a conservative don't stand a snowball chance in hell.
27 posted on 06/08/2011 10:30:38 AM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I find it hard to believe that in this election year particularly, issues won't be front and center in voter's minds.

Probably 40% or more are too busy with American Idle, Dancin' with Whoever and who did who on the soaps to know anything about the issues.

28 posted on 06/08/2011 10:32:40 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson