Skip to comments.Exclusive: Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Department
Posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters
(Jul. 5, 2011) A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:
original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.
The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.
The designated place of production is noted as:
Health Department State of HI 1250 Punchbowl str. room 325 Honolulu, HI 96813
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
I think you can go to jail for contempt of court instead. FWIW, I’m not a lawyer but I still manage to aggravate the legal so-called professon.
Well, they have almost a month to produce a new forgery.
No problem for the Messiah and his pals.
The lefties, however, are now claiming that a birth certificate has no bearing on his qualifications to be POTUS, and Obama does not have to show anything to indicate or prove that he is qualified.
FYI, a postage meter is not acceptable as proof of mailing. Needs to have some form of USPS stamp cancellation of other USPS applied notation that it was deposited with the USPS.
They finally have finished Obama’s perfectly falsified BC.
If it’s a clerk of the court and it was served properly as it appears to be so using a process server, it is legal that Hawaii must comply or try an attempt to quash.
Last time, Fuddy claimed the subpoena wasn't served properly from the District of Hawaii.
So now, this District of Hawaii US District Court subpoena demands to examine the
original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II
But must one always comply with a subpoena?
In other words, no without involving other lawyers. Thanks.
The media was also guilty of coverup and non-vetting of a candidate.
I hope this blows up in the face of the MSM and destroys their biased networks and newspapers.
We’ll know it’s real if it’s handwritten. That is the one point on which the two eyewitnesses, Fukino and Abercrombie, agree. Fukino said the original was “half handwritten” and Amercrombie said that what was on file was a “notation”—something “written down”.
Makes you wonder what’s on that ‘notation’, that is so damaging they’d risk releasing a document that matches neither description. Yes, it’s a lapdog press, and Alinsky mockery goes a long way. But there was always the chance one ‘journalist’ might ask why what was released bore no resemblance to the description of what was seen in the file. For Obama to take that chance means the ‘notation’ is NOT something he can risk being seen by the general public.
Ain’t gonna happen.
This almost certainly means they have finally FORGED a copy that will pass muster and inspection from all aspects paper, ink, typewriter, fonts etc.,and want to introduce it via this subpoena! I’m not sure who filed with the court to view it. Ann Obama supporter?
As you say, it didn’t exist - TILL NOW! So they want to “produce” it.
BTT! It is a forgery, probably from a late filing application (not approved because of lack of supporting records). There is no long form BC in HI for Obozo....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.