Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Department
The Post & Email ^ | July 05, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters

(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”

original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.

The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.

The designated place of production is noted as:

Health Department State of HI 1250 Punchbowl str. room 325 Honolulu, HI 96813

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; fraud; hawaii; hopespringseternal; manyherare4obama; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; taitz; thistimeforsure; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last
To: FARS

Unless it is the real this, someone on the internet will catch it.


41 posted on 07/05/2011 8:38:55 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FARS

... still isn’t a son of two American parents...


42 posted on 07/05/2011 8:39:06 PM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Do you think they would release a THIRD or FOURTH birth certificate??

After all this?

Who would believe it?


43 posted on 07/05/2011 8:43:23 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; Seizethecarp

PING!


44 posted on 07/05/2011 8:43:56 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
NEW AFFIDAVIT Dated July 4, 2011, about the April 27, 2011 News Conference and false statements made there and Plausible Deniability.
45 posted on 07/05/2011 8:49:38 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aroostook25

“The media was also guilty of coverup and non-vetting of a candidate.”

So was the Republican party, or McCain perhaps.

I supported McCain but I can’t understand why he did not challenge Obama’s citizenship publicly. It was and is an important issue. He wouldn’t touch it.


46 posted on 07/05/2011 8:53:00 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

Ooops! If filed by Orly then it’s a genuine attempt to get at the truth. They now have time to forge and comply with typewriter etc.

Interestingly the subpoena about the Social Security numbers may be what breaks open the log jam.

I also do not think the SUPREMES will stand for any more blocks like ignoring subpoenas after how he treated them. And his appointee Kagan is reportedly being scrutinized for conflict of interest.


47 posted on 07/05/2011 8:54:50 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

The only person who has to believe it is the judge, and the records of these judges is dismal.

I don’t know why Taitz didn’t subpoena the embedded transaction logs and complete vital records history for Obama. That is the only way we’ll ever know what really happened with his birth record, SS number, and passport. And did she really put Obama III instead of II? (sigh)


48 posted on 07/05/2011 8:57:35 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Out of curiosity, why didn’t they serve such a subpoena before? A lack of certificate number? Some other reason?

I think that no case had before progressed to the point of discovery where the plaintiff could issue subpoenas. I'm pretty sure HI has already said it would ignore any subpoena for documents.
49 posted on 07/05/2011 9:00:08 PM PDT by andyk (Interstate <> Intrastate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Absolutely no where, will simply be ignored.


50 posted on 07/05/2011 9:00:14 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; All

Who believes it now?

Even the Obamabots are trying to avoid it by saying he does NOT NEED to be a natural born citizen to occupy the Oval Office. They too are becoming alarmed disbelievers.


51 posted on 07/05/2011 9:01:23 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Obama failed to buy someone in the Hawaiian court system.

Incoming at ground zero ..... what a shame.

52 posted on 07/05/2011 9:02:20 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

It looks somewhat like someone may have surreptitiously added the other vertical slash to “II I” at the end of Obama’s name.


53 posted on 07/05/2011 9:02:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.

(A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that:

(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;

(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.




MY emphasis above... If I recall, Obama already claimed to have given Hawaii an exception to allow this material be released. So there is no remaining reason to kill this subpoena.
Loretta Fuddy, Director of the Department of Health, replied to the Presidents letter by stating “I am making an exception to current departmental policy..."

54 posted on 07/05/2011 9:04:13 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Issued by the Deputy Clerk of the Court, not Orly Taitz.

Cool.


55 posted on 07/05/2011 9:08:01 PM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
!

56 posted on 07/05/2011 9:08:45 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (You do not have to smear (Pharaoh / Imam / BigEars) Obama w/ lies....the truth does a fine job. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

sfl


57 posted on 07/05/2011 9:10:50 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sea Parrot
There's no reason not to comply with the subpoena.

Obama released it, so its now public info and state property. We have a right to see it, especially in a court case that requires it.

No big deal... there's no longer any claim to privacy.

58 posted on 07/05/2011 9:11:15 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

“....a birth certificate has no bearing on his qualifications to be POTUS....”

.
No it doesn’t. His qualifications were never in doubt, it is his eligibility that is.


59 posted on 07/05/2011 9:24:46 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: so_real

“....more and more people realize we’ve “been had” and anger mounts as people realize the Executive Office is in an usurper’s hands.”

.
The blame fully rests on our congresscritters who have protected him up to now by refusing to challenge his eligibility.


60 posted on 07/05/2011 9:29:28 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson