Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Krugman calls for dictatorship
August 1, 2011 | me

Posted on 08/01/2011 6:28:27 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Paul Krugman's latest NYT column, "The President Surrenders", already has an FR thread, but I want to call attention to the last paragraph:

"What Republicans have just gotten away with calls our whole system of government into question. After all, how can American democracy work if whichever party is most prepared to be ruthless, to threaten the nation’s economic security, gets to dictate policy? And the answer is, maybe it can’t."

Paul Krugman and the NYT believe our political system, with its checks and balances, should be gutted when it produces results they disfavor. Who are the "extremists"?


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: krugman; paulkrugman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: muawiyah

21 posted on 08/01/2011 6:55:15 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If you pet a tiny goose, you will feel a little down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
If you really agree with Krugman you too have a good chance of drowning in your own toilet. Sorry, but that's the way it is!

Not true. Thanks to people like Paul Krugman and myself, we've virtually eliminated toilet related drownings due to our heroic efforts which brought the world safe, low-gallon toilets.

You're welcome.

22 posted on 08/01/2011 6:56:51 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

We are NOT a democratic republic either; China is a “democratic republic”.

We are a constitutional republic and our founding fathers wisely left democratic out of the defining terms.

We are not supposed to be a democracy of any kind, period.


23 posted on 08/01/2011 6:57:01 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Paul Krugman calls for dictatorship

I think a call to arms is in order.

24 posted on 08/01/2011 6:59:27 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

To borrow one of Glenn Close’s lines in Dangerous Liaisons: “Like most intellectuals, he’s intensely stupid.”


25 posted on 08/01/2011 7:02:21 AM PDT by Gtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

A true conservative would still have the OLD FASHIONED KIND that really flush!


26 posted on 08/01/2011 7:40:05 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You are SO WRONG


27 posted on 08/01/2011 8:00:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If you pet a tiny goose, you will feel a little down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

>>> What, you are surprised? Krugman is a full-on Communist, and they always require a dictatorship to implement their goals. <<<

It would be nice if conservative media would say the same, and come down on Krugman like a ton of bricks, and on CNN for trotting him out as if he were some esteemed wizard when he is instead a full blown communist.


28 posted on 08/01/2011 8:03:08 AM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

krugman’s a nut and communist.


29 posted on 08/01/2011 8:03:50 AM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
It would be nice if conservative media would say the same

I *am* Conservative Media.

30 posted on 08/01/2011 8:05:14 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If you pet a tiny goose, you will feel a little down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
NO CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENT could logically act to suppress state and local unions,

Sure she could. Calling for the repeal of Davis-Bacon would be an excellent start.

31 posted on 08/01/2011 8:05:37 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
That still doesn't get rid of the unions.

BTW, Davis-Bacon keeps CERTAIN COMPANIES IN CHARGE in certain areas. It keeps outsiders out.

That's probably why it's survived.

32 posted on 08/01/2011 8:11:25 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

>>> I *am* Conservative Media. <<<

My regards. You’re a brave soul. Now, could you get a crush-Krugman-campaign going. En masse, and loud, and consant, and everywhere, and SOON, until he moves to Syria?
:D)


33 posted on 08/01/2011 8:24:26 AM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Government workers have no need to be unionized.....PERIOD, end of story. As a matter of fact I’ll take it one step further...ALL unions should be as illegal as monopolizing and price fixing is....because that is exactly what they do...in addition to supporting the COMMUNISTS.


34 posted on 08/01/2011 9:26:04 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: apillar

That’s probably the only upside to this deal. The libs wanted increased spending and radical tax hikes. So far out in lala land that anything approaching reality would be disaster to them.

So at least we got that out of the crap sandwich we just got served.


35 posted on 08/01/2011 9:43:36 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Obama's hoping that we'll have nothing but chump change left when he's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
Obviously you've never worked for the government. ALL government employees need to be unionized because they have to work for GOVERNMENT SUPPLIED SUPERVISORS.

That's the source of your problem ~ and if you don't understand it you'd better buckle down and examine the literature on the problem.

The problem is government itself ~ which is why we all want to keep it small, and hopefully under some degree of control, and that includes LOCAL, STATE and other sorts of government ~ not just the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

Got some folks out there who think the sheriff should be in charge of stuff?

I say keep the sheriff in a cage ~ have people come and ask him questions if they want, but don't turn him loose. He's just government under a different name.

36 posted on 08/01/2011 10:50:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Really? Unless you work for the Government?

21 Years in the USMC and a Government contractor for the last 10....does that qualify and “working for the Government”?

See, you have your premise all wrong...I do WORK for the government...and I was never a UNION thug....It’s only those who are EMPLOYED by the government that need a UNOIN to get by...and hide their lazy asses behind...You would know any of those types now would you?

Unions need to be made illegal.....don’t like it then find another vocation....one you will actually have to PRODUCE for.


37 posted on 08/01/2011 10:59:22 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
They get that way because they're supervisors treat them like they are property ~ kind of the same problem that happens with a contractor ~ he thinks he owns your job so he treats you like property.

It's a dreadful problem.

BTW, YOU DON'T OWN ANYBODY.

38 posted on 08/01/2011 11:12:53 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Oh, whew, it’s just you posting those, Laz.
Thought someone really deranged was posting.


39 posted on 08/01/2011 11:13:57 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I can make sure it's less a dreadful problem...get rid of most government jobs and then we wouldn't need either government supervisors or government employee unions.....

Problem solved....

40 posted on 08/01/2011 11:20:30 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson