The law has been settled since 1875. Natural born clearly delineated as “born on US soil of citizen parents”. see Minor V Happersett. I may have had an advantage over many others here at Free Republic, I went to a local law library and looked it up. That is why until now I have been so puzzled by others not coming to the same conclusion. The commonly used reference material was deliberately and fraudulently compromised so as to hide the definition by the United States Supreme Court of natural born being born on US soil of two citizen parents. The Constitution is the Constitution and the law is the law, with this nation being a Republic and not a Democracy, the law over rules the polls every time. The case is now obviously closed and you sir are wrong.
Respectfully
I retired as an E7, Navy.
"The Constitution is the Constitution and the law is the law, with this nation being a Republic and not a Democracy, the law over rules the polls every time. The case is now obviously closed and you sir are wrong."
Does this eliminate both Jindal and Rubio, in your estimation?
“Natural born clearly delineated as “born on US soil of citizen parents”. see Minor V Happersett. I may have had an advantage over many others here at Free Republic, I went to a local law library and looked it up.”
You should have looked more. Minor made no attempt to define the limits of NBC. In fact, it said they didn’t need to, since no one doubted the woman in the case qualified.
WKA had the issue argued before them, and wrote in great detail about what NBC meant. In fact, it made up half of the decision.