Anybody see that last Rambo movie? The NG opened up like he did, now that would be some violence.
Posted on 11/06/2011 8:41:46 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to commit rape.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to deal dope.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to steal.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to trash a Whole Foods store.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to "occupy" a public place.
-----------------------------------
I'm going to say something that some may find controversial. I'm going to say something that should have been said weeks ago. I'm going to say what needs to be said about the "Occupy Wall Street" barbarians.
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
Let me repeat that so there is no misunderstanding:
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
I know, I know. I'm a reactionary. I'm an old fart. Blah, blah, blah, 2+2=5, yadda, yadda, yadda, I'm a Zionist tool of the Federal Reserve, yeah, yeah, I got it.
See folks, the truth of the matter is this: the "Occupy" movement is NOT a political protest in any way, shape, or form. It's a civil disturbance. It may be the slowest populist riot in world history, but it's a riot nonetheless. The "Occupy Wall Street" protests must be shut down. Obviously, peacefully shutting down the protests is preferable, but if that's not possible, force should be used. (Whether liberals like Chairman Obama and Ron Paul like it or not.)
I know there will be some who will say I'm playing partisan games. After all, I'm a Constitutional Conservative Patriot and the bottom feeders in the "Occupy" movement are leftist piles of human debris. That's not the case at all. I'm not saying the "Occupy" movement should be stopped because of their beliefs. (Most of them are too stoned to know why they're there in the first place.) Communists, anarchists, and Nazis have held rallies in the US for decades and have never gained any traction since the US is a center-right Conservative country. I have no fear of these morons spreading propaganda or influencing the 2012 election. America has been down this road many times. There were the Socialist and anarchist movements in the late 1800's and early 1900's. There was the Communist Movement in the 1930's. There were the Nazi Bundists in the 1940's. The Weather Underground, led by Chairman Obama's ghost writer Bill Ayers, created all kinds of Marxist-Leninist havoc in the 1960's and early 1970's. None of these movements gained steam back then, just like the "Occupy" twits won't gain any now. Their beliefs don't bother me.
Their actions do.
From the "official" Occupy Wall Street website:
-----------------------------------
"Sign up for the eviction defense text blast!
Send a text to the number 23559, with the the message @occupyalert
This will be used for emergency alerts and announcements. Three weeks ago NYPD delivered what was effectively a notice of eviction, telling residents of Liberty Square that Brookfield, with the help of the city, was going to clean the park. Instead, #OWS mobilized, organizing a mass clean up, mobilizing thousands of supporters, and flooding the mayors office with phone calls. An amazing pre-dawn defense packed the square with thousands of people. Brookfield stood down and the eviction was averted.
Today rumors are rampant that the city is again considering action to end the occupation. Labor leaders, local elected officials, and news outlets are hearing the rumblings of eviction. We know that when the next eviction attempt comes, we will not get advanced warning. NYPD could move in as early as tonight, or it could be next week. We know that our adversaries are trying to build political cover for eviction by demonizing us in the press.
We need to be ready to defend the occupation. Be prepared!"
http://occupywallst.org/forum/eviction-defense/
--------------------------------
Do the "Occupy" rodents own Zuccotti Park ? No. Are these animals paying rent to the Brookfield company for the use of its land ? No. Is the "Occupy" bowel movement paying its "fair share" of taxes to the New York Collective ? (There are reports that it has received over $500,000 in donations.) No. Is the "Occupy" mob paying taxes to the Federal Leviathan ? No. What gives them the right to police their own, like they supposedly did after the sexual assaults and thefts in Cleveland and Wall Street ? Nothing. What gives them the right to deal dope and do it right on the street ? No law I'm aware of. What gives these waste-oids the right to riot the way they did in Oakland ? Nada. What gives the "Occupy" movement the right to create its own society within society ?
The "Occupy" movement doesn't have the right to do any of these things, just like I don't have the right to do any of them. They're crimes. The First Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to do any of these things, either. Either we're a society of law and order or we're not. Individuals can't just grant themselves rights and then act accordingly. Our rights are granted by our Creator (regardless of what the criminals at the ACLU think) not by man. The moment we start thinking otherwise, our society will decay even more than it already has.
The solution to this is very simple. The governors of the states with "Occupy" movements should make a statement that states the wastes of skin have 24 hours to pack up and go home. If this reasonable demand is not met, the governors should use the National Guard to remove them, using force if necessary. The imaginary rights the "Occupy" gang have given themselves don't matter. What matters are the actual rights of the citizens who live the cities where the "Occupy" protests sprang up. The actual rights are the ones being violated by the Occupy fascists and the governments of these states must respond.
-------------------------
"If some 'pacifist' society renounced the use of retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it."
Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness
Not using that exact word, but it does guarantee a right to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for redress of greivances, without time limit.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to steal.
The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to trash a Whole Foods store.
That's true.
It's also true that somebody did those things.
Be aware, though, that there are also reports that those things were done by a group not associated with the "Occupy Oakland" group, and that the Occupy Oakland group actually attempted to prevent it.
“This is happening in CITIES that have POLICE FORCES under the control communist retard MAYORS and largely populated by communist retard CITIZENS.”
That’s a good point that I didn’t consider when I wrote this. I can’t dispute that.
They didn’t exactly speak out against it, either.
Peaceably assembling does not mean shutting down ports, barring other individuals from buildings, etc.
The cops dealing with the OWSers are STATE police officers and may enforce STATE drug laws. There is no Constitutional provision forbidding STATES from making and enforcing drug laws.
National Guard mobilized to assist state police are mobilized by the Governor of the State in question and are state officers as such.
Every one needs to check this out:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2803330/posts
Thanks Minus_the_Bear!
I just don’t want this to get any worse.
You’re right.
But, as I said in Post 15, “Then why make any constitutional reference to it at all?”
these people want it to get violent. they want to provoke a response
my solution, garden hoses. not fire hoses which would toss them around like filth... just simple garden hoses that would get them wet...
while standing I. the cold... occupying the street
maybe add some sugar to attract (even more) insects
hehehe
As long as some skulls get busted in the process.
I haven't heard any of the local governments or police departments complaining that they can't handle the situation have you? So why the need for the National Guard?
A reasonable question, not posed before I replied.
You made an excellent point on Freedom to Assemble without the limitation of time.
:)
What's this, if not a call for violence?
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.Let me repeat that so there is no misunderstanding:
It's time for the National Guard to come in and bust some skulls.
Yeh I don’t think there’s enough national guard left over here to subdue anybody. Most of the state armory’s have been pretty much looted by the Feds for the overseas missions anyway.
Anybody see that last Rambo movie? The NG opened up like he did, now that would be some violence.
Agreed. I just get tired of the military getting called in to clean up someone else’s mess. Get’s old.
Does Oakland or NYC look in control ?
Thanks for the save.
This isn’t the clearest thing I’ve ever written, I’ll grant you that.
Yes. Certainly in control enough not to need troops in the streets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.