Skip to comments.Palin Should Join Trump In Debate
Posted on 12/06/2011 9:04:37 PM PST by jenk
The National Journal has an article about the Trump debate that is to happen on December 27th. Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman aren't going to be there, and now Romney says he won't "kiss the ring" of the Trumpster either.
You know, if I was Trump, I'd ask Sarah Palin to join him to moderate the debate. The left in the media are talking about how Trump is just a publicity hog, and how he's not a serious journalist who can moderate a debate, forget that, if Sarah Palin, who did go to college for journalism's sake and knows a lot about every single issue was to join Trump, well, we'd have us a great debate.
It's a joke that well-known anchors and so-called journalists get to moderate debates for whatever network they are on, they don't seem to internalize much in the way of actual knowledge of the issues. In fact, Newt Gingrich has called them out for their sleazy tactics when questioning Republicans.
If Trump wanted to up the ante, he'd ask Palin to help. Then, we'd get a real debate, what with her knowledge of this issues and her connection with the American people. And it would infuriate the Republican establishment because Romney just said he wouldn't do it. If he won't kiss the ring of Trump, he will sail far away from getting the nod of the American people if he decides to not kiss Sarah's ring.
Did you steal this from The Onion?
Bret Baier asked little Milt a few tough questions, and he’s still having nightmares. He doesn’t want his candy ass to get any more exposure. Bob
lol, but they were have in 177 debates because that’s what Mitt is supposedly good at!
*having, not have in, sorry
To what end? She isn't running. Maybe he should have Penn and Teller attend as well for levity.
I think they all are asking Trump for help and advice. Palin shared pizza as a guest of, Newt running his new ad in Iowa, Huntsman said to have courted Trump [new book], Rush playing golf and talking, Hannity with Newt and Trump recent meeting, Bachmann suggests Trump would make a great VP.
To what end? Um, are you serious? She is the perfect choice to grill the candidates on the issues.
ahh, no, I think they are trying to capitalize on his early popularity, but, he says everything he thinks, he hates China and Obama, got it. He really doesn’t have the GRAVITAS that Sarah Palin has.
Sorry, but your writing skills are sub-par, and I’m not even sure what you’re trying to say.
Taken at face value, if you are saying what I think you are—still not sure— I may not entirely disagree, but it comes off like a satire piece making Palin supporters all look like Tina Fey groupies.
Sorry, but your attitude is making me sick. You seem upset about the way I write, yet can’t understand English. If you want to make sense when posting try to read aloud, and not just with your lips moving as usual.
” To what end? She isn’t running. Maybe he should have Penn and Teller attend as well for levity. “ <<<
How about Mark Levine also, and Rush, if we are going to have a “people connection” threshold. Their “knowledge of the issues” would even include the longitude and latitude of Russia from the Palin porch, and a question referring to their personal library, or to the books they read, would not be taken as a personal threat to their person, nor an assault on their charactor. Mark and Rush would likely even know that North Korea and South Korea is not a reference to the northern region nor the southern end of Korea.
Sorry, I am flawed. I have no patience with the incessant laudible descriptions of Palin as being anywhere near precision on world history and geography, as “knowledge of the issues”.
is that a fart? Hey, is your name really moonbat, but you changed it to the clever moonhawk?
I agree with you.
Boy, are you ever!
Do you mean Mark Levin? Or the wierdo Mark Levine? And the quote you use from Lazlo indicates you and he are both a bit off mark. To what end? What a dumb thing to gather from the post. Sarah Palin is a media figure, (I’ll slow down so dodo’s can understand) and she has a vast knowledge of every issue. Since the media is having a conniption about Trump moderating the debate, he could have a media figure present who knows the things he doesn’t, like everything besides, “China sucks.”
It would certainly constitute ‘must-see-tv’ if Palin joined in to moderate. But frankly, considering what a grotesque train-wreck this primary season is proving to be, it would probably be wise to stay as far away from it as possible.
I think with Palin moderating, it will necessarily make the candidates move right, and in the case of Bachmann and Santorum, will make them shine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.