Blogger can't get his facts straight, so I yanked his misleading headline and zotted his sorry rump

Deleted | Sunday, December 18, 2011 | BC

[conservativeBC]

Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

I predicted a month back that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.

In Iowa, Bachmann and Santorum will do better than some RINO pundits predict...not gonna endorse until I'm enthused, but I'm not enthused enough yet with the field

--------------------------------------------------

Note: I tried to post the video, but it would not show up? I would rather make a posting that you could read from here in it's entirety, as not to be accused of blog pimping.

I tried several different types of codes but none of them would work on this forum.

Can you not post videos here? After I better understand how to post here I won't post another link like this.

For now if you want to watch the Palin video you will have to click this link.

[link removed by moderator]

[conservativeBC]

Why are you saying that I said she endorsed someone? I said I predicted that she would. And I did predict that she would.

There is absolutely nothing misleading about what I said.

“Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

I predicted a month back that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.”

There is still time.

[C. Edmund Wright]

You most certainly were and you got caught. It is a rare distinction indeed to be b-tch slapped by a moderator on your headline like that. And nothing changes the fact that you launched your blog site and joined FR for one reason: push Bachmann’s candidacy.

Now that’s fine and its your right - but don’t expect to be taken as seriously as someone who comes for general issue debate. You are pimping, pure and simple.

And if you think Palin called Newt or Mitt RINO’s you did not listen to your own link. She clearly said that MB and RS will do better in Iowa than “RINO PUNDITS” are predicting.

[conservativeBC]

I think that you just don’t like that she didn’t include Gingrich our Romney in the conservative category.

And that is why you are claiming that my title was misleading.

Which it clearly was not.

[conservativeBC]

Good — as long as people hear her not including Gingrich and Romney in the conservative category

[conservativeBC]

I didn’t say that she did... I said I predicted that she would.

An I dealing with third graders here?

[BykrBayb]

Your credibility is shot. You may as well give up now.

*Ping* to Metmom, who loves to see a good zot. No promises Mom, but this one looks dumb enough to keep pushing.

[conservativeBC]

thank you

[conservativeBC]

I did not once say that she endorsed anyone...

I said that I predicted that she would

[C. Edmund Wright]

>> And that is why you are claiming that my title was misleading. Which it clearly was not.>>

It’s a free country, and that means you can continue to claim that the moderator is either a liar or a flake. And you have just reaffirmed that. Your title was misleading - OR YOU ARE impaired when it comes to judgement. The moderator, not me, RULED that your header was misleading. I just happen to agree with the mod. As I suspect do most.

And nothing changes the fact that you are a one trick pony as a poster and a blogger - and nothing changes the fact that I’ve no respect for that. Again, your right, as it is my right not to respect it or think anything you say or post is serious.

I am a big fan of Sarah Palin, but she is not straight down the line conservative herself. I don’t know if her voting record as mayor/governor would equal that of Gingrich’s. So I have no real concern that she mentioned MB and RS as the most conservative. They are that, but they have major problems.

[PalmettoMason]

IBTZ.

[C. Edmund Wright]

What was your original header again?

[SoConPubbie]

I most certainly DID NOT come to that conclusion. Thanks for wasting 6 minutes of my time. She clearly did not endorse anyone, clearly said she was not enthused by any of them yet, clearly made a slam at those currently in office (Perry, Bachmann, Paul) in fact. And yet, said positive things about everyone but Huntsman at some point.

Then you did not listen very carefully.

She very clearly praised both Bachman and Santorum and had nice things to say about Perry.

There was nothing complimentory said about either Myth or Newt.

And I did not say she endorsed anyone. But she had the most praise for both Santorum and Bachman.

[SoConPubbie]

Newt is not now nor was he ever a RINO, nor is Mitt.

That is a mind-boggling statement, especially from someone who was so vocal in supporting Sarah.

[FreeReign]

If you click on the link and listen to what Governor Palin has to say, you'll probably come to the same conclusion as the blogger.

I clicked on the link, listened and came to the same conclusion as the admin mod. The blogger has it wrong.

[deport]

Wednesday November 23

Sarah Palin is about to make her endorsement of Michele Bachmann, and she is going to do it in the next couple of weeks.

---

Dude a couple of weeks have come and gone. What is your next wild?

[C. Edmund Wright]

She also issued a slam at all current office holders in the field, which would include Perry and Bachmann.

Either way, the idea that someone could reach the conclusion of an endorsement is not even close. She clearly likes the positions of MB and RS and clearly has NOT endorsed them so she clearly sees the weaknesses of their candidacies.

[muawiyah]

I'm protecting the language. Either words have meaning or everything is just "poop this" and "poop that".

Stretching RINO to encompass someone who isn't even a politician, nor a government employee, who isn't even known to have a political affiliation IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE TERM in any venue.

Sarah doesn't appear to understand Southern politics in the age before Reagan. The rest of you guys don't get a pass, and it's time she started learning the terms.

[SoConPubbie]

She also issued a slam at all current office holders in the field, which would include Perry and Bachmann.

On this we agree. It would seem her opinion closely mirrors many or our opinions about the lackluster quality of the field of POTUS candidates for 2012.

[SoConPubbie]

I'm protecting the language. Either words have meaning or everything is just "poop this" and "poop that".

Who died and made you the arbitrator of the term RINO?

[SoConPubbie]

I clicked on the link, listened and came to the same conclusion as the admin mod. The blogger has it wrong.

Maybe so, my point was that this statement "Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it. " in the OP post at the top of the page is pretty accurate given her praise of Bachman and Santorum and the conspicuous lack of praise for either Newt or Myth.