Scarborough predicts conservatives will revolt if they see Romney cruising to nomination. Ping to Today show list.
For once, a broken clock is right twice a day. The conservatives, especially the TEA Party people, didn’t unite behind Palin. So she didn’t run. That’s the real story.
So the GOP will get the Viking Funeral it richly deserves.
Best,
Chris
We’ll keep building the principled alternative, in preparation for the day conservatives get sick of being played for fools.
Even a stopped clock....
Dems want blood in the streets so we can be officially labeled the enemy and under indefinite arrest, etc.
Wrong Joe, there will be blood if zero gets elected for another 4 years.
Joe is nothing more than an Obama buttlicker. Regardless of who wins the nomination, you’ll see Joe and his MSNBC pimping a 3rd party run by Ron Paul and/or Donald Trump to ensure that Reggie Love’s socialist boyfriend wins a second term.
If enough ‘conservatives’ stay in long enough to split the remaining 70-80% of the polling/votes, Romney could sneak in. That is how McCain managed to get the nomination in 2008.
Of course, as Rick Perry pointed out on Fox&Friends this morning, 40% in Iowa are still in the ‘undecided’ column. When they come into play [actually start casting votes], the whole field could be radically changed by tomorrow evening after the votes are counted.
In other words, this is still a toss-up — much to the chagrin of the Media and pollsters.
The only thing Scarborough could ever predict is that Mika will make a fool of herself at some point in a show that nobody watches.
I increasingly thing the GOP “strategy” is to present a NE liberal politician so that they can presumably capture centrist democrat voters who along with moderate republicans can elect the next President and preserve the status quo.
Then again, ignoring the conservative wing and imploring them to “hold their nose” has been a hallmark of GOP “strategy” for the last 6 presidential election cycles, and is again likely for the next 6.
Everything depends on entitlement reform. To have even an outside chance of that, we need to hold the House and elect a conservative majority in the Senate. Since 60 Senate seats would seem to be out of reach,a dem filibuster of substantive reform is likely. That leaves four possibilities: paralysis and inaction (very likely); peeling off enough moderate dems in the Senate to break a flibuster (unlikely); a backbench dem revolt against their rule-or-ruin leadership (extremely unlikely); or passage of entitlement reform through reconciliation (difficult, but probably the best option at this point).
I think any of the Republican presidential candidates would sign the needed reforms if they reached his desk. But they will never reach his desk unless we get a working majority in the Senate and develop a legislative strategy to break or outflank a filibuster. I want a nominee who helps elect downballot Republicans in battleground states, and who has the discipline and organizational skills to navigate what will be an extremely difficult, long-odds legislative struggle.
No. We’re conservatives, not OWS.
We’ll be disappointed, and maybe withhold our votes or vote third party, but their won’t be “blood.”
No. We’re conservatives, not OWS.
We’ll be disappointed, and maybe withhold our votes or vote third party, but there won’t be “blood.”
Its pretty easy to see that is what is building up with all of this anti polygamy, anti Mormon stuff on the F.R which was most likely for the very purpose of getting the Religion worshipers to go on the war path.
I don,t know but would guess 90 percent of it either exaggerated or outright lies.
All I know is Halperin is a liberal jerk!
Regarding this field, it’s time for Palin supporters to make sure they own everything around it…so, naturally, we get everything under it
I assume he means “bad blood” between the groups as opposed to “pick up your bats and shovels and let’s get ready to rumble”.
Don’t doubt it; bit if he/ they keep up the ‘blood rhetoric’; some will certainly be, on their hands.
Don’t doubt it; bit if he/ they keep up the ‘blood rhetoric’; some will certainly be, on their hands.
There Will Be Blood’ If Romney Seen Cruising To Nomination.
Not trus just more JBS (Joe’BS)it’sa matter of anybody but Obama.I would support Charls Manson if he beat Obama.