Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney: "I'm not concerned about the very poor."
The Weekly Standard ^ | February 1, 2012 | JOHN MCCORMACK

Posted on 02/01/2012 8:41:49 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Fresh off his big win in Florida Tuesday night, Mitt Romney made the most stunningly stupid remark of his campaign.

“I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there,” Romney said in an interview with CNN's Soledad O'Brien this morning. “If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich, they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of the America, the 90 percent, 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

"There are lots of very poor Americans who are struggling who would say, 'That sounds odd,'" O'Brien replied.

"Well, finish the sentence, Soledad," Romney said. "I said I'm not concerned about the very poor that have a safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them. We will hear from the Democrat party, the plight of the poor. And there's no question, it's not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor. But my campaign is focused on middle-income Americans. You can choose where to focus, you can focus on the rich. That's not my focus. You can focus on the very poor, that's not my focus. My focus in on middle income Americans. Retirees living on Social Security, people who can't find work, folks that have kids that are getting ready to go to college. These are the people most badly hurt during the Obama years. We have a very ample safety net and we can talk about whether it needs to be strengthened or whether there are holes in it. But we have food stamps, we have Medicaid, we have housing vouchers, we have programs to help the poor. But the middle income Americans, they're the folks that are really struggling right now and they need someone that can help get this economy going for them.”

It's obvious that Romney's statement that he's "not concerned about the very poor" is incredibly tone-deaf. A candidate can say he's "focused" on the middle class without saying he's "not concerned" about the very poor, just as a candidate can say he's "focused" on the economy without saying he's "not concerned" about national security or even less vital issues like education.

But Romney's remark isn't merely tone-deaf, it's also un-conservative. The standard conservative argument is that a conservative economic agenda will help everyone. For the poor, that means getting as many as possible back on their feet and working rather than languishing as wards of the welfare state.

And then of course there are the poor who will rely on the safety net even in good times. Romney isn't sure if the safety net is in need of repair, but for the poor, Medicaid is a dysfunctional system because of federal regulation. So Republicans are united behind the proposal to block-grant the program back to the states--not just to save money but to help the poor. School choice is another conservative program designed to help poor children flourish.

Medicare and Social Security--programs Romney promised to protect the other night--are the two huge safety net programs, and they are being threatened by runaway spending. To be anti-debt is to be anti-poverty. As Congressman Paul Ryan says, when a debt crisis hits the elderly and the poor are hit the first and the worst.

Had Mitt Romney picked up his conservatism sooner, perhaps he would know these arguments by heart.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; dense; dumb; emperorromney; gopprimary; imperiousromney; mittromney; romney4dnc; romney4obama; romney4provenloss; romney4romney; romneygaffes; romneythemagnificent; themagicrino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m for Newt 150% but I do not see how he can win the nomination at this point. It’s all up hill from here.

That said, with a statement like this the election is essentially over. Four more years of Obama.


21 posted on 02/01/2012 8:56:54 AM PST by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Romney has a hard time making a valid point effectively. He sticks his foot in his mouth and it will be used against him, this quote, now in the primaries and then, should he win the nomination, in the general.

He could have (and should have) easily said something like,

"You know, the poor in this country have been betrayed by the left. They are locked into an endless food stamp/welfare game where their vote is purchased for a meager existance. I am worried about growing this economy by empowering the job creators so these less well off people have an opportunity at a job and a life that is not beholden to, or bought by Obama and the DNC,"
Would have made the point effectively and taken the attack...as it should...right to Obama and the DNC and left.

Instead he gave them ammo against him and the entire message.

AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY

22 posted on 02/01/2012 8:56:54 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The ineligible Milt:
I bet you $10,000 that WHATEVER
misstatement I make will be ignored by the MSM
that BAIN and I own and control ..... for now."

23 posted on 02/01/2012 8:58:50 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

One word: PERCEPTION and for Mittens it’s not good.


24 posted on 02/01/2012 8:59:32 AM PST by Clyde5445
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Mitt Romney: "I'm not concerned about the very poor."

I'm not too concerned either since the poor seem to have more toys than I and don't have to do jack to get it.

25 posted on 02/01/2012 8:59:56 AM PST by SouthTexas (You cannot bargain with the devil, shut the government down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

But Romney is defending the welfare state and even suggest it may have holes in it. Anyone truly concerned about the middle class would recognize that the welfare state, including Obamneycare, is killing it! Newt wants everyone to have a job!


26 posted on 02/01/2012 9:00:11 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
Thurston Cayman Island Howell III speaks.

Why oh why couldn't he have taken that 3 hour tour on the S.S. Minnow.

27 posted on 02/01/2012 9:00:33 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Exactly! We don’t need a welfare president.


28 posted on 02/01/2012 9:01:00 AM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

You might want to edit the first sentence of your post wrt “clip” vs something unmentionable on FR!


29 posted on 02/01/2012 9:04:06 AM PST by TEXOKIE (... and HAPPY NEW YEAR to all FREEPERS EVERYWHERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I am not conscerned over the very poor = Read my lips


30 posted on 02/01/2012 9:04:38 AM PST by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

His dad ruined his presidential chances with the “brainwashed” comment. Like father, like son?


31 posted on 02/01/2012 9:04:39 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Epic facepalm. And unfortunately, the implosion won’t happen until after he gets the nomination, assuming he does (Please God, no!)


32 posted on 02/01/2012 9:04:46 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-eyed killer of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I guess Newt’s next TV ad is already being prepared....

“I’m not concerned about the very poor” followed by “I like firing people”... because you KNOW the Democrats are salivating to use it in the general election.

Too bad he didn’t say this before Florida.

The establishment sure sends out their craptacular candidates don’t they?


33 posted on 02/01/2012 9:05:25 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

That’s what a conservative would say, Jeff. Romney is a statist who Is perfectly fine with the welfare state and big government.


34 posted on 02/01/2012 9:05:36 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Williams
The fact that Romney is not a good candidate does not change the fact that Gingrich is also not a good candidate.

And Gingrich's comments after Florida about "money power" and buying elections are leftist nonsense.

There's nothing conservative about "campaign finance reform" and similar garbage.

There's a lot more to attack Romney on other than his wealth and organizational acumen - those are features not bugs.

35 posted on 02/01/2012 9:05:41 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

A major gaffe. If he wins the nomination, Obama will hit him with this in television ads.


36 posted on 02/01/2012 9:08:20 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Lol!! You mean clip.


37 posted on 02/01/2012 9:09:23 AM PST by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
I believe there is a whole lot of the middle class that will agree with Romney on this. He's not going to destroy the job creators as they are the ones that will lift the middle class who through no fault of their own move one step forward and two steps back. He's also consulted with Paul Ryan and his road map instead of demagoging it like Newty did. Newt's dumb ass remark Right Wing Social Egineering referring to the Ryan Plan done to make another headline pi$$ed me off.
38 posted on 02/01/2012 9:09:35 AM PST by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Still cheering on your guy....you must be ecstatic this morning!


39 posted on 02/01/2012 9:09:35 AM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Williams
As a conservative I accept his statement 100%. Most of the “poor” safety net now includes cell phones, an SUV, Gucci bags. Why even mention the flat screen color tv’s and drugs those are givens. I’d criticize more his including the very rich. We need business. But I’ll accept a focus on the great middle class. Let’s not go liberal please.

Since this DUNCE is being touted as the "most electable conservative" I TAKE ISSUE!

The idea is to REMOVE government regulations and allow the God given abilities of mankind to flourish undeterred by burdensome government.

In one fell swoop the DUNCE has segregated Americans into groups -- the POOR (who he'll keep alive and poor), the RICH (of which he is one and thank you very much we're doing just fine) and the MIDDLE that NEED HIS help (MY what could he have up his sleeve to help us -- RomneyCare that so many "love?").

He misses the essence of what being conservative is because he's a big government MANAGER!

40 posted on 02/01/2012 9:10:54 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson