Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll Shows Rick Santorum Leading GOP Race In Tennessee [Santorum=27%;Romney=27%;Gingrich=16%]
TimesFreePress ^ | February 16, 2012

Posted on 02/16/2012 9:59:13 PM PST by Steelfish

February 14th, 2012 Poll Shows Rick Santorum Leading GOP Race In Tennessee

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has scheduled a trip to Tennessee next week while a poll indicates Rick Santorum is now leading in the state despite his lack of a campaign organization within the state.

The American Research Group Inc. poll, involving 600 "likely" Republican voters contacted by telephone Feb. 8-9, found Santorum favored by 34 percent, followed by Mitt Romney (27 percent), Gingrich (16 percent) and Ron Paul (13 percent).

(Excerpt) Read more at timesfreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Politics
KEYWORDS: freeperheadsexplode; santorum; whiner

1 posted on 02/16/2012 9:59:21 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

MISTAKE CORRECTED:
[Santorum=34%;Romney=27%;Gingrich=16%]


2 posted on 02/16/2012 10:01:01 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Santorum is moving up. Some say he’s not electable. I think he would beat 0bama.


3 posted on 02/16/2012 10:03:44 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I’ve heard from a lot of people here in East Tennessee who are excited about Santorum’s rise.

I finally got my Santorum yard signs in. Put one out yesterday. Eager to vote. Go Rick!


4 posted on 02/16/2012 10:05:30 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; American Constitutionalist; Antoninus; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.

FReepmail “Antoninus” to be added or removed.

5 posted on 02/16/2012 10:06:45 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It is getting hard to follow all the states that Rick is significantly up in. I am wondering if the wildfire Rick started might be too much for the Milt smear machine to handle all at once.


6 posted on 02/16/2012 10:09:40 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I’m for Newt and didn’t think TN would be in play by now. Guess I’m glad Romney didn’t seal the deal yet.

Hmmmm, I’m going to have to do some thinking between Newt and Rick.


7 posted on 02/16/2012 10:10:13 PM PST by Fledermaus (I can't fiddle so I'll just open a cold beer as I watch America burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Let me help you. Newt believes in Global Warming, Rick does NOT. Anyone who promotes that fraud is not what we need.


8 posted on 02/16/2012 10:25:29 PM PST by arrogantsob (Obama must Go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Not that simple. Newt was being a typical politician and, thinking it was inevitable (sad to think that at the start) wanted to be sure “cap and trade” wasn’t rammed down our throats. I do hate when the GOP acts like that though but I get it.

No different than Rick jumping on the establisment bandwagon and backing earmarks and Specter, among other things, when he was “told” to do so by senate leadership and Bush.

It’s a long list of pros and cons with both and I’m still weighing my decision beyond NO ROMNEY!


9 posted on 02/16/2012 10:45:07 PM PST by Fledermaus (I can't fiddle so I'll just open a cold beer as I watch America burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

I’ll take anything in place of a Myth.


10 posted on 02/16/2012 10:48:17 PM PST by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Fair estimation. Finally, an honest Newt supporter. I think electability and fewer deviations from basic conservatism pts Santorum above Newt. However, I will always consider Newt a hero of sorts.


11 posted on 02/16/2012 10:51:52 PM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

This entire matter is “heartless”


12 posted on 02/16/2012 10:58:23 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

but he did support cap and trade

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/interviews/gingrich.html?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=pressRelease

-In 2000, candidate George Bush pledged mandatory carbon caps; it was a campaign pledge. What did you think of it at the time? Were you for that?

I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good. And frankly, it’s something I would strongly support.

-And did you, at the time, in 2000?

At the time I wasn’t directly involved in the campaign.

-He reversed that campaign pledge within months of taking office. Would we be in better shape today if he had kept that campaign pledge?

If he had instituted a regime that combined three things I just said — mandatory caps, a trading system inside the caps, as we have with clean air, and a tax incentive to be able to invest in the new technology and to be able to produce the new technology — I think we would be much better off than we are in the current situation. ...

The CAFE [Corporate Average Fuel Economy] system for automobiles hasn’t worked. Everybody cheats and gets around it. The caps, with a trading system, on sulfur has worked brilliantly because it has brought free-market attitudes, entrepreneurship and technology and made it very profitable to have less sulfur. So people said, “Wow, it’s worth my time and effort.”

Americans get incentives. Americans like winning. ... What we ought to be doing is inventing a whole series of breakthrough mechanisms that create incentives for people to have a better environmental outcome in an economically positive way, to accelerate the transition to better and cleaner technologies. If Bush had led that effort in 2001, or if somebody will lead that effort in 2007, we will get much further down the road than we’re going to get with litigation and regulation. ...


13 posted on 02/16/2012 11:09:29 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I hear the sound of Newtheads exploding in the night.


14 posted on 02/16/2012 11:18:49 PM PST by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

ari-freedom, thanks for your link to pbs interview with Newt on global warming... that, combined with Nancy on the couch thing, and his past as an “enviromental studies” professor, make me really think that he would quite likely betray the anti-AGWers and the anti-treehuggers

I’ve been kind of undecided. Now I say go with Santorum. Consolidate with an anti-Romney. Mainly it is that he is coming on strong with his anti-Obama rhetoric. Much better, or at least more consistent (performance wise), than Newt. And he forcefully expresses what the heart of the fall election will be about: FREEDOM. (Not [solely] the economy, or some other thing of minor importance.)

Check out his Meet the Press performance from Sunday, very strong performance. Seems surprisingly articulate. And has good answers to the “contraception smear” etc. http://www.therightscoop.com/rick-santorum-on-meet-the-press/

And his “Made in the USA Plan” whatever will be a winner in the upcoming election, who cares about the economics of it, which are fine (need domestic manufacturing for natl security, also). His appeal to Joe the Plumber types, and the working man, and the industrial states, is huge.

Finally, I assume Santorum will excite the base in a major way. Romney is reported to be having money problems (hotair). Romney may raise an inadequate $300 million, but with an excited base, tons of small and large donations will flow to Santorum, yielding $1 billion or more. This type of money will be -required- to beat Obama.


15 posted on 02/16/2012 11:47:15 PM PST by Hokestuk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Spector was a supporter of Santorum. That was no different than Sarah supporting Capt. Queeg in his last campaign. Loyalty is very important in politics. That is far more forgivable than being a mouthpiece of global warming one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated by the Left.

I will vote for Newt against the Commie any day of the week in any case. But he is just too damaged by his personal life to get the nomination. The dumb comments do not bother me that much but the public is not accepting of Republicans with a checkered martial life. Santorum, on the other hand, is a Boy Scout and cannot be attacked in that area. The Left will have to attack him on policy which will make it clear that he is a solid conservative.


16 posted on 02/17/2012 12:20:50 AM PST by arrogantsob (Obama must Go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Santorum can’t take the South or win in southern states... Sarcasm.. at least that is what the Newt supporter would have us believe.


17 posted on 02/17/2012 2:29:31 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Ever since Cain dropped out I have been supporting Santorum.
Yes, I thought about supporting Newt, but Newt with his past when he got into the GOP as a Roosevelt, Wilsonian, Environmentalist, that turned me off from Newt.
Him getting all cozy with Nancy Patrica D'Alesandro and going all wobbly with the Global Warming Hoax didn't help either.
18 posted on 02/17/2012 2:33:33 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

How about when Newt was for individual mandates on one day and then a few days later was against it back in May of last year ?


19 posted on 02/17/2012 2:35:46 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Let me help you. Newt believes in Global Warming, Rick does NOT. Anyone who promotes that fraud is not what we need.

One suspect issue and you got it all figured out. Wait until all eyes are on Rick before jumping to the conclusion - there have been more worrisome claims against him than any I heard for Newt and while you can't take them to the bank (I'm sure you wouldn't - but you will take thosae against Newt for deposit) there is likely to be a balance between what is true and what is not, along with a few surprises.

20 posted on 02/17/2012 3:37:34 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Where did you get them? I want a yard sign and a bumper sticker. Thanks.


21 posted on 02/17/2012 5:57:27 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Romney is running the Santorum is for earmarks ad three times an hour on talk radio in Memphis.


22 posted on 02/17/2012 7:28:45 AM PST by Sybeck1 (It's official, Mitt can't win in either Dixie or the Midwest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
You can get bumper stickers now from the store at the Rick Santorum website:

http://store.ricksantorum.com/

I actually got my bumper sticker off of eBay, because when I bought it (last July, I think) the Santorum website didn't yet have such things.

The store at the Rick Santorum website has rally signs, but I don't think that it has yard signs. I bought my yard signs from a site on the internet:

http://www.victorystore.com/rick_santorum/index.php

Their signs seemed to be nicer and cheaper than other places. (Most signs at other places were running $15 to $20 each.) The prices at this place are $9.95 each, 2/$16.00, 5/$35.00, 10/$50.00, 50/$200.00, 100/$375.00.

I started to order ten and put them out around town, but the right of way issues pose a problem. I ordered a couple for my yard. Shipping was $10 (kind of steep, but the total price was better than at other sites).

I bought a couple of signs like this one:



Probably need to hurry. It took about a week for the signs to arrive.
23 posted on 02/17/2012 9:20:19 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

I voted early for Newt here in Tennessee. It seems a majority of the callers on the Nashville talk shows have been leaning his way, but that’s a microfacet of the bigger picture.

I just don’t think Santorum has what it takes to stand toe-to-toe with Obama.


24 posted on 02/25/2012 6:47:47 PM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson