Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taitz v Democrat Party of Mississippi (and SOS of MS) Order Appointing Special Judge
BirtherReport.com ^ | February 17, 2012 | Unattributed

Posted on 02/19/2012 9:35:33 AM PST by Seizethecarp

The Honorable R. Kenneth Coleman, Senior Status Judge, appointed Special Judge to preside over challenge.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birftards; mississippi; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz
Say what you will about Dr. Taitz's courtroom litigation skills (urp!), she still can kick the courthouse door open! Perhaps additional competent trial lawyers can join this challenge.

While there could be nothing to prevent another judicial declaration that the Ankeny confabulation is settled law on the definition of NBC to make Barry eligible, another avenue to get an appeal to SCOTUS may have been established.

Fogbowers seem a bit perplexed and offended that this appointment of a retired judge has given standing to "an out-of-state interloper" to challenge precious Barry. Apparently, in MS "any person" has standing to make a ballot challenge so Dr. Taitz did not have to either be a MS "elector" (qualified voter) or have one as a client.

Fogbower lawyer "Bob" (aka "Sgt. Friday Bob" lays out the likely sequence of events in Mississippi:

"IOW, SCOMS has indicated that it has jurisdiction to hear this challenge. It appointed a special judge to preside over the matter.

"The special judge may decide the matter over papers. Or the special judge may order an evidentiary hearing.

"At the end, the special judge will write a recommendation, and send it SCOMS. It can accept or reject the recommendation, or send it back to the special judge with instructions.

"Nb. Taitz is pro se (no client or PHV to get in the way)."

1 posted on 02/19/2012 9:35:48 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

We can all dream on—but I doubt anything will become of this.

My big fear is that he is going to be re-elected............


2 posted on 02/19/2012 9:38:23 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; philman_36; Red Steel; DiogenesLamp; GregNH; edge919

ping to Dr. Taitz getting standing for a Mississipi eligibility hearing.


3 posted on 02/19/2012 9:39:11 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

When does Ms have their primary? The hearing would have to be held prior, one would think.


4 posted on 02/19/2012 9:50:24 AM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

What I am seeing as a problem is, the states (GA recently) end up indemnifying obama.


5 posted on 02/19/2012 9:56:04 AM PST by stylin19a (time to Obamanos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Orly should come to Texas. If Rick could find a pair, he’d have standing. Of course, the powers that be in Texas are doing everything they can squash our votes.


6 posted on 02/19/2012 10:01:30 AM PST by bgill (Romney & Obama are both ineligible. A non-NBC GOP prez shuts down all ?s on Obama's admin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
@Joe Stampley - "Roll On Big Mama" video and lyrics
7 posted on 02/19/2012 10:01:44 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Orly has never taken my advice in the past but I will keep trying. As the saying goes, “A man/woman who represents him/herself in a matter has a fool for a client.” Please Orly, ask someone like Mario Apuzzo to represent you in this matter.
8 posted on 02/19/2012 10:14:53 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

“Please Orly, ask someone like Mario Apuzzo to represent you in this matter.”

At least Orly should hire local MS counsel to enter her evidence and witness testimony into the record!


9 posted on 02/19/2012 10:26:29 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

The “class” in the sentence in MvH about which doubts are expressed has “citizens” as the subject, NOT “natural born citizens.”
From Minor v Happersett:

“Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of the parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

Yet some people insist on substituting the phrase “natural born citizen” into that sentence for the word “citizens.”

Due to honest expectation bias or partisan dishonestly, people defending Barry’s eligibility WANT the sentence to read:

“Some authorities go further and include as natural born citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of the parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

But that is NOT what is written in MvH. The “doubts” are NOT about a sub-class of NBC, but a sub-class of citizens who are NOT NBC at birth because the immediately preceding MvH definition of NBC (about which there is no doubt) ONLY includes those born in the country to parents who are citizens.

The MvH holding on the definition of NBC is precedent because it was required to establish a citizen class to which Mrs. Minor belonged.

The WKA declaration that WKA was a citizen was based on the non-citizen class identified in MvH about which there were doubts as to CITIZENSHIP and the WKA court reached WKA’s citizenship but NOT his NBC status. Even the Ankeny court admitted this, as did Malihi.


10 posted on 02/19/2012 10:28:45 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Unfortunately, the Indiana Court of Appeals had no interest in reviewing the Ankeny decision. Does anyone know, why didn't Steve Ankeny appeal to SCOTUS? It seemed at the time like the quickest, surest way to have the issues squarely addressed.
11 posted on 02/19/2012 2:06:44 PM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

Sorry — “Indiana Court of Appeals” should have been “Indiana Supreme Court.”


12 posted on 02/19/2012 2:33:22 PM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22
“Does anyone know, why didn't Steve Ankeny appeal to SCOTUS?”

IIUC the issue became moot once the electoral college and Congress certified the election results with no objections...and Barry was sworn in. After the inauguration there was no remedy that an Indiana state court could provide to the plaintiffs.

In effect the 2012 ballot eligibility challenges are the only available “appeal.”

13 posted on 02/19/2012 2:36:49 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Thanks for the ping. At least she is fighting!


14 posted on 02/19/2012 5:44:55 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson