Skip to comments.Vital Records Indicate Obama Not Born In Hawaii Hospital (Part 2)
Posted on 03/01/2012 10:58:04 PM PST by Windflier
NEW YORK, NY An intensive examination of the contents of Obamas alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.
In cooperation with former members of the Social Security Administrations Records and Claims Investigation office, along with information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), this installment of our report reveals evidence, for the first time, which shows the content of Obamas document image was hastily and recently manufactured by criminal counterfeiters secretly working in collaboration with both the White House and the municipal government of the State of Hawaii.
Most importantly, the actual data found in the document image reveals that Obamas natal history is in direct, and even absurd, conflict with historical precedents defining citizenry, demographics and birth metrics as well as protocols governing vital statistics accounting while exposing epic deceptions on a scale never before seen in American political history.
Aside from the contextual contradictions revealed by Obama's alleged 1961 birth records, it can never be dismissed that, according to centuries of legal and doctrinal precedence, the fact that Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth forever disqualifies him from ever being eligible to hold the office of president unless the Constitution were to have been legally changed prior to his presidency.
A natural-born citizen is one born of geographic and biological circumstances, and to have remained under those citizenship metrics from birth to election, which make it impossible for any authority or public perception to consider him or her allied with any status other than naturally-born as a citizen of that nation.
Being born in a geographic location which is under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to two citizen parents are two of the three major components of natural-born citizenship according to historical authority defining the term. The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.
These metrics were not made to hurt the feelings of those not qualified. They were intended to protect the sovereignty of the United States of America and its Constitutional rights through ensuring, to the highest possible degree, the allegiances of its executive powers. For, only the executive branch is led by one.
Failure to understand this is tantamount to willful ignorance and inferior understanding of the reason why America remains the greatest santuary of freedom and protection in world history.
Hey, I’m all for the Sheriff’s work and I think he’s uncovering some important stuff.
I just don’t see anything to back up the claim to that statement, which is central to the argument presented.
Here is the link to
"This is part one of a three part story which will present evidence discovered within the vital records archives of the United States, Great Britain and the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan which shows that Barack Obama exploited the municipality of Hawaii and U.S. Vital Statistics reporting methods in order to counterfeit birth records in a criminal attempt to deceive the American people and fraudulently usurp the power of the U.S. Presidency. "Also take a good look at the instructive graphic at the top of the blog page clarifying "natural born" qualifications. Well done.
I was curious about the expertise of the author of this post, Dan Crosby, but his bio wasn't readily available.
The following interesting and related bio info for Penbrook Johannson is, however, posted at one of his other blogs, "The Mombosan Son", :
"Not surprisingly, Barack Obama and I share biographical similarities. We were fostered in paradise, along with a younger sibling, by our white grandparents whose origins once resided in Midwest America before moving west with hope of a better life for our family. Our American grandfathers served the United States as members of the military and we both had a close relationship with a maternal grandmother who passed away in 2008. We both claim a Christian faith, and we are both educated in professional fields attending college where we had occasion to write for the college newspaper. We were both abandoned by our biological fathers who, at the time of our birth, both resided for some time in Hawaii. Then we were both paternally adopted. We were both born to educated, though wayward mothers during their less than discretionary teen years of the 1960s. Both of our mothers moved to the Pacific Northwest soon after our birth and, later, became ill with incurable sickness as we entered into the endeavors of our professional lives. I, too, was issued a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth after applying for the document based on Hawaiian law 338-17 which allowed me to gain natural-born American natal status despite my birth in Brisbane, Australia. I am natural-born citizen of the United States because the laws of the state of Hawaii says I am, despite the fact that my natal origins are nowhere near American soil. I could actually run for President, despite being born abroad, under the same circumstances Barack Obama was."posted August 6, 2010
Good one, thanks cinciella!
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Thank you for your researches.....
Can you give us a quick summary about the "pencil codes"
(I thought they were the football launch codes)
Thanks in advance.
It wasn’t my research. I just happened to find this post. I was talking about the numbers in pencil that are all over the birth certificate. I’ve always wondered if they were significant. I’ve never read an explanation of what they relate to, until this article, and it looks like they are significant.
The presence of the 6 next to the Place of Birth item is most troubling. As the second digit of the number 56, the 1961 VSIM uses the number 56 to code the location of births which occur outside of the United States but which are processed in conjunction with the county of registration. The states and the District of Columbia are numbered in alphabetical order from 01 to 51 while Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Panama Canal Zone were 52 through 55, respectively. This left the number 56 as the code for classifying Remainder of the World. This can be found in the 1961, 1962, 1968, 1977, 1993 and 1999 versions of the VSIM. In 1993, number 55 was the code for New York City because of its large birth volume it was classified as its own major birth rate statistical reporting area.
Essentially, this means the code tape file contains two spaces for the state to record a geographic code for the foreign location of the occurrence of the birth without showing that location on the certificate for a resident mother.
On an alphabetical list of the states including District of Columbia, Hawaii is #12, #6 is Colorado, #26 Missouri, #36 is Ohio, and #46 is Vermont. This would certainly indicate that the birth took place outside the US.
The Constitution states ‘natural born citizen’. Being ‘natural born’ might be a given in some frame of reference but including the word ‘citizen’ makes for a specific feature. Your example includes my own birth and I have no problem not being a ‘natural born citizen’ even after service in WWII. The USA has been great to/for me even though I lost an only brother fighting on Okinawa.
There are several ways to lose one's "natural born" citizenship status. Adoption by foreign parents and acquiring citizenship in their country is certainly one of them. Once lost, the status of natural born citizenship can never be regained.
Who says—on either count?
You betcha. This is without doubt, one of (if not the best) articles about Obama's fake bc that I've ever seen.
Huh? That was the best part!
Abso-frikken-lutely. Best article I've seen on this subject in years.
Good on you, Quix. Very well done.
A hat tip is due to ExTexasRedhead. She sent it out.
A nice thought, but is there a shred of Constitutional corroboration of this claim?
I don't know, but such requirement might be found in our immigration statutes. Whether it is or not, I wholeheartedly agree that it ought to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.