Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Not Over: Government Plans for the Worst: Forced Evacuation of Tokyo
SHTF ^ | 04/03/2012 | Mark Slavo

Posted on 04/03/2012 1:17:11 PM PDT by SatinDoll

While it has for the most part disappeared from mainstream view, the Fukushima nuclear disaster is anything but over. In fact, the situation in Japan has gone from bad to worse.

Bottom line: There is no way to contain the radiation.

Even more alarming is that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other agencies have warned that the nuclear storage pools (the containment units that are being used to cool the nuclear fuel) have been damaged and may collapse under their own weight.

Such an event would cause widespread nuclear fallout throughout the region and force the government to evacuate the nearly 10 million residents of Tokyo and surrounding areas, a scenario which government emergency planners are now taking into serious consideration.

(Excerpt) Read more at shtfplan.com ...


TOPICS: Food; Government; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: environment; falseflagevent; fukushima; radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: katana
Those two bombs contained only about 80 Lbs of fissionable material each, not thousands of tons.

Also, if the cooling pools develop leaks, the rods may heat up enough to melt, and the potential outcome of that is unpredictable

61 posted on 04/04/2012 4:12:03 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
"Thanks. Do you go to SHTF regularly? I do."

I do. I usually do a search.

62 posted on 04/04/2012 4:23:36 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

PING!


63 posted on 04/04/2012 6:14:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell; jpsb

The two of you are aware that the fuel rods there contain only 3% enriched uranium when installed, correct? I’ve seen photos of people sitting on fuel rods before delivery to a nuclear facility, and they can do that because the radioactivity is so low. Not true after a runthrough.

The resulting plutonium after fissioning isn’t all that great an amount but it is still ‘hot’. After a few years in a spent fuel pool it can be stored in the open air.


64 posted on 04/04/2012 6:35:53 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
SatinDoll said: "The two of you are aware that the fuel rods there contain only 3% enriched uranium when installed, correct?"

No, I wasn't. But 3% of 2000 tons is 60 tons. That's still considerably more than one would find in a bomb.

What can you tell us about the plutonium fuel?

65 posted on 04/04/2012 7:40:21 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

I don’t know anything about the plutonium fuel; are you sure it is fuel and not the fissioned spent fuel? My experience has been with PWRS, which are may be fueled differently.

I did find the following per Wikipedia:

Size

A modern BWR fuel assembly comprises 74 to 100 fuel rods, and there are up to approximately 800 assemblies in a reactor core, holding up to approximately 140 tons[vague] of uranium {see my note below]. The number of fuel assemblies in a specific reactor is based on considerations of desired reactor power output, reactor core size and reactor power density.

Safety systems Main article: Boiling water reactor safety systems

A modern reactor has many safety systems that are designed with a defence in depth philosophy, which is a design philosophy that is integrated throughout construction and commissioning.

A BWR is similar to a pressurized water reactor (PWR) in that the reactor will continue to produce heat even after the fission reactions have stopped, which could make a core damage incident possible. This heat is produced by the radioactive decay of fission products and materials that have been activated by neutron absorption. BWRs contain multiple safety systems for cooling the core after emergency shut down.

Refueling systems

The reactor fuel rods are occasionally replaced by removing them from the top of the containment vessel.

Because they are hot both radioactively and thermally, this is done via cranes and under water. For this reason the spent fuel storage pools are above the reactor in typical installations. They are shielded by borated water several times their height, and stored in rigid arrays in which their geometry is controlled to avoid criticality. In the Fukushima reactor incident this became problematic because water was lost from one or more spent fuel pools and the earthquake could have altered the geometry. The fact that the fuel rods’ cladding is a zirconium alloy was also problematic since this element can react with water at extreme temperatures to produce hydrogen and oxygen, and can ignite in air. Normally the fuel rods are kept sufficiently cool in the reactor and spent fuel ponds that this is not a concern, and the cladding remains intact for the life of the rod.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Note: 140 tons of uranium can be a deceptive amount. It is a very heavy element, has very high density being approximately 70% denser than lead, and what appears to be a small amount can be surprisingly heavy in weight!


66 posted on 04/04/2012 9:54:40 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
SatinDoll said: "... are you sure it is fuel and not the fissioned spent fuel? "

I think it is weapons grade material that has been processed to make it useful as a fuel, mainly, I think, as a way of turning it into something that terrorists can't use. I think the material in Japan came from France.

67 posted on 04/05/2012 7:00:12 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Head Researcher: Boulder, Colorado a “hot spot” for Fukushima fallout — None of their other US or Canadian samples came close to Boulder’s contamination, except Portland which was even higher

http://enenews.com/head-researcher-boulder-colorado-hot-spot-fukushima-fallout-other-canadian-samples-came-close-boulders-contamination-except-portland-higher


68 posted on 04/14/2012 9:10:25 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Head Researcher: Boulder, Colorado a “hot spot” for Fukushima fallout — None of their other US or Canadian samples came close to Boulder’s contamination, except Portland which was even higher

http://enenews.com/head-researcher-boulder-colorado-hot-spot-fukushima-fallout-other-canadian-samples-came-close-boulders-contamination-except-portland-higher

This might lend some credence to it.


69 posted on 04/14/2012 9:11:49 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson