Skip to comments.Globalist Plan to Disarm America
Posted on 04/10/2012 6:06:21 AM PDT by IbJensen
PL87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act / State Department Publication No.7277
If someday your children or grandchildren ask you how Liberty died in America and what happened that caused the demise of the Nation, read this and you will be able to answer them.
If they ask you why the Citizens have been disarmed, you'll know. If you want to know why, go to your local library, no matter where you live in the United States. Tell the librarian to show you where the 'United States Code books' are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC. These hard-covered books are printed every 8-10 years. They are updated with annual soft-back supplements each year until a new hard cover issue comes out. At the present time, the 1988 hardbacks are on library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9. The page numbers are in the center near the middle binding. The section numbers are along the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 651. Here you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)
TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by "disarmament." The disarmament calls for the elimination of our armed forces. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds.
(This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a).
TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed forces..." and as Item (d)" ...Elimination of armed forces...." What you need to know is that your armed forces are being eliminated and relinquished from national control which, in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two stages, we will have no more army, no more navy, no more air force. In the third stage, we shall have a "zero" military. Before Stage I closes, all citizen owned guns are to be banned.
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a).
Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. Your librarian can also furnish you a copy. Also ask the librarian to get you a copy of "The Blue Print for the Peace Race." It is a 35-page booklet printed by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 - General Series 3 - Released May of 1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State Department Document 7277.
Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1 million men. China and the Soviets are to be reduced to that level also. At this point, we are at Stage I at which time we are to transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage II, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to this same Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian. The world's smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security, Council in Stage II. President George Bush and Admiral Wm. J. Crowe [have referred] to this process as being "in transition."
TURN TO PAGE 655. On this page in Volume 9 of the United States Code, read "Policy Formation." The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone from disarmament, reducing or limiting our armaments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the president, or if it is authorized by further legislation by the Congress. (This is title 22, Section 2573.)
Every couple of years the House of Representatives votes to appropriate funds for this on-going program. Since P.L. 87-297 was first passed into law in 961, there have been 18 updates to it - all bad - with no deletions of these issues I lay before you now. The Congress knows that the plan includes the policing of the United States by foreign troops. (The world army they are forming in Europe.) The Congress is allowing our military bases to be closed down, except for those that will be used by the world army. You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in "The Blueprint for the Peace Race."
If the president and Congress can promote a "Constitutional Convention" you will find yourself with two new constitutions (communist in structure) which in one states in Article VIII, Section 12: "No person shall bear arms or possess lethal weapons except the police and members of the armed forces...."
The Congress has praised these documents and is on record in Senate hearings seeking ways to install these constitutions. Ask your librarian for "Revision of the United Nations Charter - Hearings Before a Subcommittee (Foreign Relations) Feb. 2-20, 1950 U.S.Government Printing Office." Nothing has changed since. They are still viable. The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force...."
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined above. While you are at it, look up Public Law 101-216.
State Department Publication 7277 is available at:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/guns/dos7277.htm and in electronic form as file PUB_7277.ZIP on at least the following bulletin boards:
Paul Revere - San Jose (408) 947-7800 or (408) 279-0872
The Rising Storm (408) 739-8693
It is so unconstitutional as to be laugable, if it is even true. Also, the cat is out of the bag. It may eventually happen, but now while this generation is alive.
I remember in high school (1972) people would read something like this and say, “people will never stand for that”. I would say, “No. This generation will never stand for that.”
Homosexual marriage would be an excellent example. I now see God’s wisdom in giving us a 70 year life span. I’d go nuts if I had to live through what this nation is obviously headed toward.
"Soviets"? As I raise an eyebrow to the efficacy and time-frame of this...
and yet, china is increasing the size of their armed forces
Funny, I recall Reagan doing the exact opposite.
Follow the links to http://www.libertygunrights.com/
Click on documents on the menu and you will find many documents in various formats.
Yeah, we've all seen how effective European military troops have been since the end of WWII. /sarcasm
Cripes, did you take a minute to evaluate this screed and reconcile it against reality? Far from being disarmed, the citizens of this country have more guns than ever. And we have had military buildups for Vietnam and Reagan's efforts to end the cold war. These are simple, basic facts at odds with this rant - a rant for which I can find no working links.
I sure hope those United Nations pussies wear those gay blue helmets when they come to try and get my guns.
I see a first page there and some excerpts. Why not the entire document so the excerpts can be reconciled with the entire law?
Doubt it. Folly like this is why Strum Ruger has had to stop taking orders for guns and why their stock price has gone through the roof.
You may be referring to the original page (http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/un/do.htm) and the fact that the links are broken. Perhaps you could visit your local library:
Tell the librarian to show you where the ‘United States Code books’ are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC
Or you may be referring to the information on the documents page.
If you scroll down there are several documents listed - here is one:
Cover Letter for 3 Part Mailing to Supreme Court (NDAA)
Perhaps the folks pushing a conspiracy theory like this could make copies at the library and then scan them in as .pdfs - they are the ones making the claims, the impetus is on THEM to back it up.
This particular theory largely does not reconcile to historical reality and many of the claims are utterly outlandish.
The law (or at least what little of it we can see from the links) reads like some stupid Dem kumbaya agenda that was passed, signed and since has accomplished diddly. There is no army being trained in Europe to occupy America - heck, the Europeans have to CALL America if they need a brushfire in the Balkans put down.
Reagan did not work to implement this agenda, and LBJ built up the American military as well.
And privately-owned guns are more present in America than ever.
We have plenty of bona fide, verifiable issues with the Dems imposing socialism and wanting to erode gains in self defense and CCW laws without resorting to outlandish theorizing off an old law.
I just posted this, after reading, without comment in the hope of soliciting comments from others.
The left (an enormous number of people) in this nation work day and night to destroy our right to bear arms. But then you probably knew that.
Oh, I know that. I have been to many a 2nd Amendment rally. But I also know that the left has been spectacularly unsuccessful in recent years in exploiting the news to turn the tide away from greater 2nd Amendment rights. No reason for complacency, but also no reason to swallow every conspiracy theory that comes along, either.