“The liberating power of the free enterprise system”

Catallaxy Files ^ | June 8th, 2012 | Steve Kates

[No One Special]

Mitt Romney gave a speech today on the benefits of free enterprise. This was not just a bit of boilerplate but the real thing. I cannot get a copy of the full text of the speech but these are excerpts from the speech provided by John Hinderaker at Powerline:

[A]long with the genius of our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, and our Bill of Rights, is the equal genius of our economic system. Our Founding Fathers endeavored to create a moral and just society like no other in history, and out of that grew a moral and just economic system the likes of which the world had never seen. Our freedom, what it means to be an American, has been defined and sustained by the liberating power of the free enterprise system.

That same system has helped lift more people out of poverty across the globe than any government program or competing economic system. The success of America's free enterprise system has been a bright beacon of freedom for the world. It has signaled to oppressed people to rise up against their oppressors, and given hope to the once hopeless.

It is called the Free Enterprise System because we are both free to engage in enterprises and through those enterprises we ensure our freedom.

But sadly, it has become clear that this President simply doesn't understand or appreciate these fundamental truths of our system. Over the last three and a half years, record numbers of Americans have lost their jobs or simply disappeared from the work force. Record numbers of Americans are living in poverty today - over 46 million of our fellow Americans are living below the poverty line.

This is not just a failure of policy; it is a moral failure of tragic proportions. Our government has an absolute moral commitment to help every American help themselves and today, that fundamental commitment has been broken.

This is someone who understands our economic system from the inside and understand not just its technical superiority but its moral superiority. Romney then goes into the disastrous overreach of government and of the need to roll it back:

Today, government at all levels consumes 37 percent of the total economy or G.D.P. If Obamacare is allowed to stand, government will reach half of the American economy. And through the increasing controls government has imposed on industries like energy, financial services and automobiles, it will soon effectively control the majority of our economic activity.

One must ask whether we will still be a free enterprise nation and whether we will still have economic freedom. America is on the cusp of having a government-run economy. President Obama is transforming America into something very different than the land of the free and the land of opportunity.

We know where that transformation leads. There are other nations that have chosen that path. It leads to chronic high unemployment, crushing debt, and stagnant wages.

I don't want to transform America; I want to restore the values of economic freedom.

In a free-enterprise system, we don't measure our success in equal outcomes, but instead in how well we preserve and promote the equality of opportunity. And this system has resulted in unrivaled prosperity and made America the greatest nation in history.

President Obama's vision is very different - and deeply flawed. There is nothing fair about a government that favors political connections over honest competition and takes away your right to earn your own success. And there is nothing morally right about trying to turn government dependence into a substitute for the dignity of work.

Where my vision believes in the ingenuity of the American people, his vision trusts the wisdom of political appointees and boards, commissions and czars. It's one in which ordinary Americans must get permission from people in Washington before they can buy, build, invest or hire.

It's a world of federal mandates and waivers, tax credits and subsidies, federal grants and loan guarantees. It's an economy where a company's lobbyists will be more important than its engineers, and federal compliance lawyers will outnumber patent lawyers.

This is game on. The divisions between Obama and Romney are as clear as could be. You have one or the other. This election really is a defining moment in American history and for much else as well.

Update: The full speech is here.

[usnavy_cop_retired]

Great speech. You may not like Romney because he is not “conservative” enough, but he can win with that type of optimism. Let the PAC’s do the negative, (which I think is Romney’s plan), and he will do the “shining mansion on the hill” speeches. I don’t care how we beat Obama, just that we do it, and hopefully in a landslide.

[cripplecreek]

I guess it all depends on your definition of capitalism and I have doubts that Romney holds the same definition I do.

My electric company got approval to raise rates to make up for “losses” resulting from market fluctuations and falling demand. Basically protecting stockholders from the risk that they chose to take. Meanwhile, the same company is building wind farms that no one wants.

When the rules of supply and demand no longer apply, we cease to be a capitalistic society.

[katana]

Mr. Romney was not my first, second, or even third choice from among the announced and potential candidates on the Republican side and I didn't vote for him in my State's primary (which he won anyway). But I am very glad that he and his campaign team seem to realize that the best tack any Republican can take in a national campaign is to channel Ronald Reagan's outlook and rhetoric and when attacked kick back at the opponent immediately and try your best to hit him squarely in the nuts.

Still have deep doubts about whether much of that rhetoric would be matched in the behavior of a Romney administration. But at least it seems that Romney actually wants the job, is fully qualified, and is willing to do what's necessary to win. That alone is a refreshing change from previous candidates who were afraid of the media and their own shadows.

Worries about the "real" Romney just make it even more imperative to fill the majorities of both houses of Congress with as many genuine Conservatives as we can manage. Contrary to what the current squatter in the Oval Office believes or desires, the president is not a king and Congress still has the power, if they choose to exercise it, to hamstring a bad executive and push a good or even barely decent one in the right directions.

[Reeses]

We should use “free enterprise”, a term even a freeloading Democrat can love, not “capitalism”, a derogatory term used by Karl Marx. Most of our high capital enterprises are now in China, free from the EPA, IRS, ATF, DHS, DOJ, DEA, USDA, FCC, FDA, OSHA, ICE, FBI, etc. In America many free enterprises do not require a tremendous amount of capital, and most of that is often borrowed.