Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Didn't Even Last a WEEK [Ann Barnhardt]
Barnhardt Capital Management ^ | July 3, 2012 | Ann Barnhardt

Posted on 07/03/2012 10:03:27 PM PDT by No One Special

As promised, Romney has folded on ObamaCare too, although had I wagered money on the timing, I would have thought that he would have lasted at least a week. But apparently the revenue curve from stupid, imbecilic suckers giving Romney money in the wake of the SCOTUS decision fell off hard enough that the Romney people felt that it served no more purpose to perpetuate the repeal charade.

Here's the link.

I hope every single one of you who gave that forked-tongued jackass money feel the full shame and embarrassment of your own gullibility and obtuseness. This slackjawed sentimentalism WILL BE THE DEATH OF ALL OF US. Your rah-rah loyalty to con-artists who wrap themselves in platitudes so that you can have a "team" that makes you feel good about yourself isn't noble or admirable. It is nauseating and disgusting. It is truly sickening to see people elevate false sentiment over truth - all for the sake of a truly shallow SOCIAL EXPERIENCE.

Ignorance is one thing. Abject stupidity in the face of mountains of pounding evidence is another.

-Romney wrote and implemented ObamaCare's template in Massachusetts.

-RomneyCare destroyed the Massachusetts economy. Romney refuses to this day to acknowledge that there is anything wrong with RomneyCare, or the economic damage it had done and continues to do to Massachusetts.

-Romney's top aides and inner circle were frequent visitors to the White House and were instrumental in the drafting of ObamaCare in 2009.

-Romney has VOCIFERICOUSLY defended the concept of the mandate that people must, as a condition of their very existence, purchase a specific commodity.

-RomneyCare funds abortion with a mere $50 co-pay and forces all people under its control to pay for contraception and sterilization, including the Church in Massachusetts. The reason you never heard anything about this is because Archbishop Sean O'Malley is a slack-jawed idiot who is a Marxist and, like most bishops today, doesn't actually believe in Catholicism. He's just a narcissistic, politicking little shell of a man who is desperate for worldly approval - particularly from other men. Sad but true. Someone needs to say this.

So, not only has O'Malley not complained about the horrors of RomneyCare, but he embraces it and supports ObamaCare. And, as a result, he still gets invited to all of the fancy parties with all of the rich, powerful men whose approval his entire existence revolves around and self-esteem depends upon. And I'm sure that he also lives in complete terror of having some rich, powerful man like Mitt Romney come up to him at a party, smile, lean in, and ask, "You don't really believe that a piece of bread turns into God, do you?" The vast majority of bishops today are embarrassed and humiliated by the Eucharist. Hence the entire problem. It all really does come down to that, whether you understand that or not. Someone has to say it.

-Mitt Romney will never, ever repeal ObamaCare. The Congress will never, ever repeal ObamaCare. The only way to get rid of ObamaCare is a junta or civil war and the establishment of the Second American Republic. The First American Republic is dead, and it is never, ever coming back.

I will not be celebrating Independence Day tomorrow, because to do so would be utterly hypocritical and a lie. The First Republic is dead, and to pretend that it isn't only feeds and enables the usurpers and tyrants who are desecrating its corpse in order to give themselves the appearance of legitimacy. If I live to see the establishment of the Second American Republic, THAT date will I observe.

The Black American Flag, flown in distress, is my flag now.




TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: annbarnhardt; barnhardt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2012 10:03:41 PM PDT by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: No One Special

And so you agree with Justice Roberts?


2 posted on 07/03/2012 10:06:50 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

As John Roberts proved this week, it no longer matters who we vote for or who gets elected. They all wind up screwing us in the end.

A pox on all their houses as far as I am concerned.


3 posted on 07/03/2012 10:15:05 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

The reason you never heard anything about this is because Archbishop Sean O’Malley is a slack-jawed idiot who is a Marxist and, like most bishops today, doesn’t actually believe in Catholicism. He’s just a narcissistic, politicking little shell of a man who is desperate for worldly approval - particularly from other men. Sad but true. Someone needs to say this.
***My last name is O’Malley and this guy is a disgrace to my name. I wish there was a way to shake some sense into him.


4 posted on 07/03/2012 10:15:41 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

I agree it is a tax and I agree it is unconstitutional and I agree that Obama and the Democrats lied when they said it wasn’t a tax.


5 posted on 07/03/2012 10:15:52 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Agree with tyrants? No.


6 posted on 07/03/2012 10:15:52 PM PDT by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Our Joan of Arc!


7 posted on 07/03/2012 10:16:50 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
And so you agree with Justice Roberts?

It's not a matter of agreeing with Justice Roberts.

It's a matter of what the SCOTUS decides that makes it reality.

We may not agree that abortion is a right but it is the law. An immoral law yes but it's the law of the nation.

If we minimize the Roe vs Wade down to agreeing or disagreeing with those particular judges at the time how does that help us change it?

One does not have to agree with Justice Roberts to agree that ObamaCare has won.

8 posted on 07/03/2012 10:18:17 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
They all wind up screwing us in the end.

Even Justice Thomas?

Remember, Roberts needed to pay Obama back for the Amnesty executive order which allows children brought to the US illegally to stay in the United States. Obama's Amnesty for children brought here illegally does not only cover those children here from Mexico.

9 posted on 07/03/2012 10:22:19 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Mitt Romney will never, ever repeal ObamaCare. The Congress will never, ever repeal ObamaCare.”

From today’s vantage point, I fear this is correct.

Dear God, please show me that I and others who feel this way are completely wrong.


10 posted on 07/03/2012 10:23:22 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Im not finding where Romney is supposed to have changed his position of repealing obomacare.


11 posted on 07/03/2012 10:25:13 PM PDT by GregoTX (Federalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Santorum would have been better to bring the hammer down on Obamascam. Mittens is compromised on the topic. What a conundrum.


12 posted on 07/03/2012 10:26:14 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
it no longer matters who we vote for or who gets elected. They all wind up screwing us in the end.

Maybe it's just that we haven't thrown enough of them out at one time to force a change.

-PJ

13 posted on 07/03/2012 10:27:41 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX
Im not finding where Romney is supposed to have changed his position of repealing obomacare.

Neither are you finding anywhere where Romney has renounced his support of an Individual mandate.

In fact, he whole-heartedly still supports his Socialized Medicine monstrosity called RomneyCare and THIS is what he would "Replace" Obamacare with. Just at the State level so he could try and hide this Socialized Medicine Monstrosity behind States Rights and the 10th Amendment.

Ann, in this article, lays out the terrible aftermath of RomneyCare in this article very succinctly.
14 posted on 07/03/2012 10:30:33 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX
Im not finding where Romney is supposed to have changed his position of repealing obomacare.

How about Romney making it materially harder to overturn Obamacare?

If Romney contends that Obamacare does not impose a tax, then it will take 60 votes in the Senate to get past a Democratic filibuster. Whereas if Romney agrees that Obamacare does impose a tax, then it will only take 50 votes plus the vote of the Vice President to overturn Obamacare.

15 posted on 07/03/2012 10:31:31 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

He used tortured logic and the result is the institutionalization of tyranny. Tyranny is the very thing the Constitution was designed to stand as a bulwark against. The final nail in the Constitution is set by Roberts.

How will he be remembered?


16 posted on 07/03/2012 10:32:41 PM PDT by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

The DemonRats screw us with a power drill. The RINO’s screw us one gentle turn at a time.


17 posted on 07/03/2012 10:33:14 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
What a conundrum

Tragedy is a better fit IMO.

18 posted on 07/03/2012 10:33:49 PM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Keep the Bishop’s feet to the fire and he will fold his magic underwear! Second, he cannot replace OBummercare with Magicunderwearcare because POTUSes don’t legislate, so there!

We are pissed and will remain pissed. This legislation must go! That’s the bottom line of the silver lining!


19 posted on 07/03/2012 10:37:47 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

And all without a kiss or a back rub.


20 posted on 07/03/2012 10:37:56 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

But Romney cannot easily argue that as a tax it is unconstitutional. I agree that it is. But Roberts has ruled otherwise. In the face of that, it is probably better to make Obama call it a tax to claim constitutionality for it, or else, if a penalty, to say it is unconstitutional. Romney can ask him in debate “Which is it? Is it a tax, or is it unconstitutional?” And if Obama points to Massachussets, Romney will bring up the 10th Amendment to the professor of constitutional law. I understand where you are coming from, but there are many ways to play the game of chess.


21 posted on 07/03/2012 10:38:02 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

You are not wrong.


22 posted on 07/03/2012 10:39:04 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Good grief. Obummer was never a “professor” or even an “assistant professor”!


23 posted on 07/03/2012 10:40:21 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

LOL, sorry, true enough, but I don’t want to use the word “teacher” because it is near and dear to me. I am one.


24 posted on 07/03/2012 10:42:47 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
See Link
25 posted on 07/03/2012 10:48:00 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Romney did speak out .. . June 28, 2012 and probably more since then. Not that I love Romney, I don’t, but it’s not fair to say that he hasn’t addressed the issue.

http://nation.foxnews.com/mitt-romney/2012/06/28/romney-condemns-obamacare-ruling-i-will-act-repeal

““As you might imagine I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision, and I agree with the dissent, what the court did not do on its last day in session, I will do on my first day if elected President of t he United States, and that is I will act to repel Obama Care. Lets be clear about what the court did and did not do. The court said that Obama care does not violate the Constitution. What they did not do was say Obama-care was a good law or its good policy, Obama care is bad policy yesterday, its bad policy today.”


26 posted on 07/03/2012 10:51:45 PM PDT by imemyself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
The First Republic is dead

You are so right. I never planned to vote for Romney. Now I may just not vote.

27 posted on 07/03/2012 10:52:48 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
Romney can ask him in debate “Which is it? Is it a tax, or is it unconstitutional?”

I hope that he has the balls to ask him just that.

I'm definitely not a Romney fan, but I agree with him on this. The mandate is not a tax (which congress has the Constitutional right to impose) it is a penalty for not purchasing a service (which congress does not have the Constitutional right to impose).

While the Republican party may think that they'll get more mileage out of the "largest Tax hike in history" meme than with the "un-Constitutional mandate" meme with the uninformed, voting public, the facts are the facts.

28 posted on 07/03/2012 10:53:47 PM PDT by Washi (Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: imemyself
Romney did speak out .. . June 28, 2012 and probably more since then. Not that I love Romney, I don’t, but it’s not fair to say that he hasn’t addressed the issue.

Our problem isn't with the "Repeal" part of Romney's message, but the "Replace" part of his message.

Since Romney is still on record supporting his RomneyCare and it's Individual Mandate, this is what he will replace ObamaCare with. This is socialized medicine at it's worst.

Furthermore, his RomneyCare relies on the redistribution of wealth by forcing taxpayers to pay for the healthcare of others which is just another aspect of Socialism.

So while his slogan sounds great, in reality, it's just more Big-Government, nanny-statism, wrapped in Socialized Medicine.
29 posted on 07/03/2012 10:58:39 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
Yes. The RINO/DINO clan has been abusing Americans for years. They serve a Globalist agenda. And if you think they have made life worse for us, what if you were a Christian living in Egypt ? An Orthodox living in Kosovo ? They bring nothing but death and destruction. All for the love of money and power. They are the Criminally Insane. Knowing all that, and realizing all that, one must realize that progress from this point forward, must be carefully considered.

Obviously, there is no place in the First American Republic anymore, for conservatives. We cannot support such malfeasance. It is morally wrong to continue supporting them. That much is true. Now, our goal should be to either rid the Criminally Insane from the reigns of power, or to break away cleanly and form the Second American Republics. In essence the United States of New America.

Now one must come up with a plan that has a chance of success. It would be much safer to rise up, while Romney was the President. He wont mind cracking down on a secession movement or a possible revolution, he will however be somewhat constrained by the fact that the people making their move, actually voted for him. Obama would have no such restraints and leftist would actually cheer their fellow conservative Americans being shot down in the street. Right now they are cheering Obama/Hillary as they systematically destroy entire nation states (Libya, Egypt, Syria).

30 posted on 07/03/2012 10:58:50 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

That is a good way to put it.

In some ways, I think I’d rather just get it over with. The whole thing needs to collapse in order to have any hope of being rebuilt.

Might as well start now.


31 posted on 07/03/2012 10:58:50 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Perhaps this is why the media selected Romney. It’s all choreographed. McCain 2008, the sequel.


32 posted on 07/03/2012 11:13:12 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
The final nail in the Constitution is set by Roberts.

How will he be remembered?

As a sheep in sheep's clothing [Sir Winston quote]. For those of you in Rio Linda, a wuss!

He got it right the first time. But then he changed sides and reworked his opinion so that he would be liked by the Beltway intelligentsia.

He should resign.

33 posted on 07/03/2012 11:16:33 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

I hate to realize it, but this stuff started with the Constitution itself, if I understand correctly.

1.The folks running the Convention decided to close all the windows despite intense heat just so folks outside would not hear what was being discussed.

2. James Madison took detailed notes of the debates at the Convention, but refused to publish his notes during his lifetime to protect the names of those with opinions that might prove unpopular with the people.

The ruling class was alive and well behind closed doors even back then.

“There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” Daniel Webster.


34 posted on 07/03/2012 11:37:53 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Roberts will be remembered by how the history books tell his story. The question is: Who will win and therefore, who will write the history books.


35 posted on 07/03/2012 11:47:54 PM PDT by Terry Mross ( To all my kin: Do not attempt to contact me as long as you love obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Well said. Exactly why I asked the question.


36 posted on 07/03/2012 11:53:23 PM PDT by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
In some ways, I think I’d rather just get it over with. The whole thing needs to collapse in order to have any hope of being rebuilt.

I have never been so pessimistic about our Republic being saved as I have since this unimaginable ruling.

It has left me distressed like no other time in my life. The elites in D.C. of both parties and of all three branches of government have been on a relentless path of turning our Republic into a socialist H*ll.

Jefferson warned that true tyranny will rise from the Judiciary. In the past 100 years most Judicial rulings have tended to give more power to the Federal government.

Over the past 80 years it has only been Reagan who nudged our Republic back towards Liberty. Sadly it was only a short lived move.

ALL other Presidents have been statistd of varying degrees.

The left's domination of our education institutions has guaranteed that most citizens are taught to be subservient to the State, taught to see the government as a necessary good.

The left is collection of emotion driven, envy driven narcissists.

Almost all the leftists in the media, in higher institutions of education, and in government have extremely evil and sadistic hearts. Their lusts for power and control of others knows no bounds.

Their insane drive to control all aspects of our lives never rests.

For those of us who cherish Liberty we are left with the likes of Boehner and McConnell to lead the effort. To top it off we have someone on our side running for President who has a solid record in office that illustrates his innate belief that an activist government is a good government.

No matter, we must make it a priority to defeat Obama and as many Statists as possible, as soon as possible.

We are truly living in nightmarish times. I remember the optimism of Reagan, the fantastic growing economy the general happiness of the people. The only ones miserable in the 80's were the insane left.

Now, 30 years later everyone is miserable. Conservatives are upset because they see their Republic being destroyed. The left is still miserable and is more rabid than ever in their lust for absolute power.

One thing is for certain. We are truly accelerating towards the end game. I pray that God will be on the side of those seek to do what is right.

37 posted on 07/03/2012 11:57:45 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sand88
I pray that God will be on the side of those seek to do what is right.

A better plan might be to get on God's side!

Who do you think God would vote for? Certainly not for evil or the lessor thereof...

38 posted on 07/04/2012 12:11:42 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Errant

God does not “vote”, nor is he “on” a person’s side.

We try to understand what God requires of us, and do His will.

And yes, God DOES support the lesser of two evils. What does that mean?

It means that NO HUMAN is PERFECT, and any leader God allows us to have is his choice for us now.

In other words, we got what we deserved when we got Obama. Oh, how I hope we have learned our lesson. Or do we have to get another leader that makes us suffer?

It’s OUR choice.


39 posted on 07/04/2012 12:31:47 AM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

LOL, sorry, true enough, but I don’t want to use the word “teacher” because it is near and dear to me. I am one.

How about “guest speaker”? I think that’s more along the line of it.


40 posted on 07/04/2012 12:32:02 AM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain
I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing...

Maybe it's late?

41 posted on 07/04/2012 12:42:25 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
If Romney contends that Obamacare does not impose a tax, then it will take 60 votes in the Senate to get past a Democratic filibuster

Nonsense.

This is not true and has never been true.

0bamacare was passed via a budget reconciliation gimmick which allowed the 'rats to subvert the normal process, and this left them open to the same mechanism for repeal. The Majority ACA opinion has NO BEARING on the rules of the Senate: we NEVER needed 60 votes.

42 posted on 07/04/2012 12:44:26 AM PDT by FredZarguna (When you find yourself arguing against Scalia and Thomas, you AREN'T a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Mr. RomneyCARE WANTS SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.

Like DEATH PANELS, RomneyCARE is Myths greatest
achievement.

DEATH PANELS will be the “gem” in the throne of the
GOPe this year.


43 posted on 07/04/2012 3:21:33 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
It's a matter of what the SCOTUS decides that makes it reality.

ONLY ONE Justice stated it was a tax Roberts

I doubt that legally makes it a tax

However 5 Justices said it was constitutional -- so it is
44 posted on 07/04/2012 4:13:45 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
"Obama's Amnesty for children brought here illegally does not only cover those children here from Mexico."

Are you saying that Robert's adopted children were brought here illegally? (I'm not arguing with you... I truly do not know anything about it, only heard today that he had two adopted children)

45 posted on 07/04/2012 4:29:52 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie mmm mmm mmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

46 posted on 07/04/2012 5:13:35 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No One Special

Abject stupidity in the face of mountains of pounding evidence is another. You prove your point about yourself.


47 posted on 07/04/2012 5:43:47 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina
Now I may just not vote.

Don't do that.

Third-party, if you can find one that doesn't make you gag, write-in if you have to, but do whatever it takes to put another entry in the "Other" column.

48 posted on 07/04/2012 5:44:13 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Woe, sorry for the accident of your heritage, the O’Malleys didn’t deserve it. But you’ve also got the governor of Maryland, O’Malice himself. If it’s any consolation, the former owner of the Dodgers, Walter, was a grand old man I hear.


49 posted on 07/04/2012 5:53:58 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: No One Special
Ah, the mystery is solved!

Diogenesis is really Ann Barnhardt's "nom de guerre," or pen name while posting here.

50 posted on 07/04/2012 5:57:48 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson