Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama ‘evaluates’ multiple gun control bills advanced by Senate Democrats
Monachus Lex ^ | July 31, 2012 | John Pierce

Posted on 07/31/2012 7:20:59 AM PDT by JohnPierce

In the wake of the tragic ‘Dark Knight’ attack in Aurora Colorado, the media and gun control advocates (but I repeat myself) seem determined to push the Democratic Party into renewing its push for more gun control. And there is no shortage of Democratic candidates willing to oblige regardless of the damage it might do to their party this fall.

While President Obama and his advisors see the political dangers of such legislation in a tough election cycle, the Democratic leadership in the Senate seems unable to contain themselves. Following on the heels of an amendment to the Cybersecurity bill to ban the sale, transfer or possession of normal capacity magazines, Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg is introducing a separate bill that would completely ban the online sale of ammo; the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.

But his bill would do far more than that. It would require that sellers of ammunition be licensed by the government making it difficult or impractical for many small rural stores to sell ammunition at all. The surviving ‘licensed’ ammo dealers would be required to maintain records of all sales with buyers being forced to produce photo ID and any failure in record-keeping on the part of sellers would give rise to criminal liability. In addition, any sales of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition would have to be reported to law enforcement for follow-up investigation.

Think about that. Because of the acts of a single madman, in the Democratic Party’s vision of the future, buying a couple boxes of .22 long rifle ammo would justify your inclusion in a government database and a possible visit from the ATF. You know … many of my fellow ACLU members are hard-core about privacy rights but seem oblivious to the precedential implications of these kinds of attacks on gun rights. Hasn’t the war on drugs shown us anything?

In any case, President Obama is taking a very cautious approach with gun control legislation (at least until after the election). When White House Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked about the President’s stance on the issue during Monday’s press briefing, he would only say that the President would “evaluate them as they make their way through the process.”

Moderate Democrats should be very concerned about this development. Libertarians and independents have to vote for someone and we usually decide by applying the “lesser of two evils” approach. In determining which party represents the lesser evil, Americans are concerned about a variety of issues including the economy, health care, the civil rights of immigrants, and marriage equality to name just a few. But gun control isn’t even on the radar for most of the Democratic base or independent voters. By allowing New York and California elites to dominate the party platform, they run a real risk of losing both the presidency and the Senate in the fall.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; backoffbarry; banglist; democrats; elections; guncontrol; lautenberg; obama; presidentobama; youwillnotdisarmus

1 posted on 07/31/2012 7:21:09 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Americans need to make the commie ‘RATS pay dearly in November for this attack on our Bill of Rights.


2 posted on 07/31/2012 7:25:22 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The NRA did not create James "The Joker" Holmes. Harvey Weinstein's Hollywood did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Let’s all line up to piss on lautenburg’s head stone. Hopefully it’s soon.


3 posted on 07/31/2012 7:25:39 AM PDT by bicyclerepair ( REPLACE D-W-S ! http://www.karenforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I linked to an article on the main blog post that indicates the Republicans may take the Senate this fall as well! :)


4 posted on 07/31/2012 7:27:54 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

I would never wish anyone dead but I would certainly love to see him voted out of office!!!


5 posted on 07/31/2012 7:28:46 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

I’m thinking many are seeing the handwriting on the wall in November. Why wait for a lame-duck session when you can start grabbing freedoms right now?


6 posted on 07/31/2012 7:30:54 AM PDT by FLAMING DEATH (Are you better off than you were $4 trillion ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLAMING DEATH

That is a very good point. This may be a reaction to their own knowledge of the political realities facing them in this economy (that they have created).


7 posted on 07/31/2012 7:34:05 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
Evaluating...yeah right! Does anybody think he wouldn't sign them in a heartbeat if they made it to his desk? This is the same Barack Obama that as a Illinois legislator said he supported a complete ban or private ownership of guns.
8 posted on 07/31/2012 7:48:04 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

I can only pray these bastards start down the gun control path.......it’s a sure loser....just ask Bill Clinton!!


9 posted on 07/31/2012 7:56:53 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

Buy what you can now, as much as you can!


10 posted on 07/31/2012 7:57:19 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I would love to increase the collection but the economy (what they should be focusing on) is conspiring against me. :)


11 posted on 07/31/2012 8:14:56 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
@Congressional Record JULY 30, 2012
Page S5658 right column, 1/2 way down... By Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN):
S. 3458. A bill to require face to face purchases of ammunition, to require licensing of ammunition dealers, and to require reporting regarding bulk purchases of ammunition; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

No bill text yet that I can find.

12 posted on 07/31/2012 9:15:38 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Thanks for the designation! I had looked earlier but didn’t see it.


13 posted on 07/31/2012 9:16:53 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce; Joe Brower

Good catch.


14 posted on 07/31/2012 9:20:25 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
Thanks for the designation!
My pleasure.

Thank you for the alert.

15 posted on 07/31/2012 9:26:07 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
With the advancement of video communications these days this "face to face" BS could be circumvented if this bill were to ever be passed.
I guess we'll have to wait and see how "face to face" is defined from the bill language.
16 posted on 07/31/2012 9:30:40 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Hopefully it will be posted on Thomas by the end of the day or first thing tomorrow morning.


17 posted on 07/31/2012 9:48:09 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
I just added banglist under keywords.
You might want to do so in the future yourself to get more exposure.
18 posted on 07/31/2012 2:27:54 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: apillar

He’s just looking for stuff he can implement by executive order or “under the radar.”


19 posted on 07/31/2012 2:40:38 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson