Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List (notification of new articles). FReepmail me to get on or off.
Posted on 08/01/2012 4:38:16 AM PDT by expat1000
If Romney accomplished nothing else during his Israeli visit, he did manage to offend every single Palestinian Arab terrorist group, all of whom, the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the PFLP and the DFLP, issued press releases denouncing him. Their American media outlets, on a desperate gaffe hunt, seized on his statement that the GDP Per Capita differences between Israel and the territory under the control of the Palestinian Authority are the result of different values.
The official media narrative is that these differences are the results of eons of oppression, checkpoints and blockades. Fair enough. But then why does the IMF put Israel's GDP Per Capita well ahead of the oil rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia has no Israeli checkpoints, no Israeli soldiers or planes flying overhead. It has wealth literally pouring out of the ground with a fifth of the world's petroleum reserves. And yet the IMF puts it 13 places behind Israel and the World Bank puts it 8 places behind Israel. The only Muslim countries with a better GDP Per Capita rating than Israel are small monarchies drowning in oil.
The non-oil Muslim countries who are closest to Israel are Malaysia and Lebanon, 32 and 33 places behind Israel. Both countries also have sizable non-Muslim populations. Muslims make up only 50 percent of Lebanon and only 60 percent of Malaysia.
38 places below Israel is Turkey, which until recently was a secular country and actually has a statistically significant atheist population. And that's it. Below that we fall off a cliff into places like Belarus, South Africa and Grenada; all of whom still have better GDP Per Capita rates. No Muslim country without oil has a better GDP Per Capita than a Muslim country that has sizable Christian or Buddhist minorities.
What Romney didn't mention, but should have, is that the Palestinian Authority dealt yet another blow to its economy when it drove out the Christian population. Christians in the territories have traditionally made the best businessmen and the capital of the Palestinian Authority was actually started by Jordanian Christian refugees escaping Muslim persecution. And their decline follows a pattern of Christian communities across the Middle East declining and disappearing under Muslim rule.
Meanwhile Israel is burdened with 1.2 Muslims inside the Green Line, many of whom work in an unreported black economy, and account for 52 percent of national social benefits. Israel's national unemployment rate is 5.6 percent. The Arab unemployment rate is 27 percent. Only 59 percent of Muslim men and only 19 percent of Muslim women are officially part of the workforce. That's compared to 56 percent of Jewish women and 52 percent of Christian women.
The average Israeli family has double the monthly income of the average Arab family. Half the Arab sector officially lives in poverty. According to many NGO's this is due to racism. According to many economic statistics this is due to working for a living and then reporting your income.
The Israeli Jewish GDP is nearly three times higher than the Arab-Israeli GDP. This could be blamed on the usual scapegoat of racism, but the Israeli Arab GDP of $6,750 is actually better than the $5,900 GDP in neighboring Jordan, the $6,540 GDP in Egypt and the $5,041 GDP in Syria. This is the same range in which most non-oil Arab Muslim states are grouped and it is clear that there is no escaping it without a big petroleum reserve. Or like Lebanon with its $15,523 GDP, a whole lot of Christians to actually work for a living.
Again culture is still the determinant. Israel within the Green Line only has about 150,000 Christians and about as many Druze, and both groups perform better economically. Christian Arabs have a higher employment rate and a better rate of higher education than Muslims.
Apart from that official 1.2 million, Israel is also responsible for the 4 million in the Palestinian Authority (some of whom overlap with that 1.2 million and some of whom are imaginary and exist only to collect benefits from international agencies) who are still Israel's responsibility, according to them and to the world, even though they also continue insisting that they want their own state.
The reason why the GDP in Palestinian areas is so terrible is because its inhabitants live in a giant welfare state. Their income comes entirely from foreign aid. They don't need an economy because the United States and the European Union are their economy. They don't need a state because the UNRWA is their state. Palestinian Arabs were already receiving 725 dollars in per capita assistance. Despite their absolutely terrible GDP, only 16 percent of their population in the West Bank lives below the poverty line. That's a better rate than that of Israeli Arabs, who don't have an entire UN agency dedicated to taking care of them, and do actually have to work for a living.
It's easy to admire Israel for what it has accomplished, but it stands out so much because of the region it's in. Singapore and Hong Kong are less remarkable because they are in a region where countries don't just give up and wait around for foreigners to come and find oil on their land or for the Mahdi to arrive. In Asia, countries make things happen for themselves. In the Middle East, if you're not Jewish or Christian, and you don't have oil, then you have economic problems.
But let's leave the Middle East and head over to Asia. India and Pakistan are divided by a GDP Per Capita difference of almost a thousand dollars. India is naturally in the lead. Within India, Muslims are at the bottom of the economic ladder. Their per capita GDP is lower, their literacy rate is lower and they perform worse than Hindus. And yet the average Indian Muslim annual income at 513 dollars is still higher than the average annual income in Pakistan at 420 dollars. This remains consistent with the higher Arab-Israeli income and lower Jordanian Arab income model meaning that Muslims in non-Muslim countries will earn less than the majority, but more than they would in a majority Muslim country.
In Africa, Muslim Somalia sits next door to Ethiopia and Kenya and its GDP is so small it can't even be registered compared to $1,093 and $1,746 for them. You might try to blame Somalia's civil war, but Rwanda, which experienced a genocide, has a $1,341 GDP. Niger with an 80 percent Muslim population and a $771 GDP sits next door to Chad with only a 53 percent Muslim population and a $1,865 GDP. Next door Cameroon has a 70 percent Christian majority and a $2,257 GDP.
Now let's head over to Europe. In Britain the myth of the hardworking Bangladeshi or Pakistani storekeeper is practically sacred. In reality 70 percent of Bangladeshis and Pakistanis live in low income households, compared to 50 percent of Africans, 30 percent of Indians and 20 percent of the natives. Bangladeshis and Pakistanis not only have dramatically higher unemployment rates than natives, but they have higher unemployment rates than Africans.
If the issue were racism, then their unemployment rates would be in line with far lower Indian unemployment rates. Instead Muslims have the worst economic record in the UK. Pakistani Muslims in the UK are three times more likely to be unemployed than Hindus. Indian Muslims are twice as likely to be unemployed as Indian Hindus.
Again this fits the same model of Muslims from non-Muslim countries being less economically inept than Muslims from majority Muslim countries. The crucial difference between minority Muslims and majority Muslims is culture. Minority Muslims do have their own culture, but no minority group can entirely escape the values of the majority culture. Arab Israelis and Indian Muslims absorb enough of the values of the majority culture to perform better than their neighbors in Jordan or Pakistan. And they even carry on these absorbed values when they move to another country.
We can see the direct consequences of those values in action. In the UK, Muslims have the highest dropout rate and lack of qualifications of any religion. They have the highest male and female unemployment rates. This isn't racism, this is Islamism.
Muslims have the highest unemployment rate in Ireland. In Belgium, Moroccans and Turks have a five times higher unemployment rate of the native population. In Australia, Muslims have twice the unemployment rate of non-Muslims and forty percent of their children live below the poverty line. Muslims also have the highest unemployment rate in Canada, 14.4 percent to a national rate of 7.2 percent.
The response to all these numbers is the usual cry of racism, but racism fails to explain why Muslims fail more comprehensively at home than they do abroad. If Muslims fail in the West Bank, then Israeli checkpoints are to blame. If they fail in Canada, Australia and Europe, then racism is to blame. But if they fail in Pakistan, Somalia and Saudi Arabia-- who is to blame?
It can't be Mitt Romney or Benjamin Netanyahu, because neither of those men run Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. The answer can't be racism, because Saudi Arabia gets everything it wants and it still fails. It can't be colonialism, because these days the Muslim world is doing the colonizing. So what's left?
Responsibility is the missing element. It's the character value without which there can be no economic success. The temptation by leftists and Muslims to respond to Romney's comments and these statistics by finding someone else to blame is revealing and damning. These statistics are only the tip of the iceberg of larger statistics about illiteracy, violence and corruption that account for Muslim economic malaise.
The same lack of responsibility that manifests itself after a Muslim terrorist attack, when Muslims rush to position themselves as the victims, rather than dealing with the violence in their midst, also manifests itself in the economic arena and in every aspect of life. This lack of responsibility is a failure of values that cannot be escaped or ascribed to racism, checkpoints or the boogeyman.
Muslims have failed to deal with their problems and so we are left dealing with them instead. But just because the Muslim world insists on pretending that the problems aren't there or blames them on third parties does not make the problems go away.
GREAT ARTICLE!!!
Goes to show that the Chosen people of GOD and those that formed a country for Jesus Christ have done well - in comparison to those that chose a cult leader that presses more importance in chanting from a plagiarized so called holy book!
So if the Christians keep moving out of Muslim nations - and the oil finally dries up - does that mean Islam will dry up with it?
The Islamic enlightened period was when they conquered by sword - held Christian slaves that were educated (and other non-Moslems) and when they all died out — so did their enlightened era!
I will be sending this out to EVERYONE!
And that's the reason why the "blame whitey" crowd and the "you did not build this" crowd cannot succeed.
If a person cannot accept responsibility for a problem, they darned sure can't define it and then find a solution to it.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE GAFFES?????
(today’s Obama media talking point)
What is this “chosen people” comment I keep hearing? This is the one thing that bothers me when I hear it about the Jewish Faith- Chosen for what? Are they better than all others in the eyes of God? It’s not a good thing to say to the non-chosen, is it?
At least Romney seems to be making the right enemies.
>>What is this “chosen people” comment I keep hearing? This is the one thing that bothers me when I hear it about the Jewish Faith- Chosen for what? Are they better than all others in the eyes of God? It’s not a good thing to say to the non-chosen, is it?
From:
http://www.jewfaq.org/gentiles.htm
Contrary to popular belief, Judaism does not maintain that Jews are better than other people. Although we refer to ourselves as G-d’s chosen people, we do not believe that G-d chose the Jews because of any inherent superiority. According to the Talmud (Avodah Zarah 2b), G-d offered the Torah to all the nations of the earth, and the Jews were the only ones who accepted it. The story goes on to say that the Jews were offered the Torah last, and accepted it only because G-d held a mountain over their heads! (In Ex. 19:17, the words generally translated as “at the foot of the mountain” literally mean “underneath the mountain”!) Another traditional story suggests that G-d chose the Jewish nation because they were the lowliest of nations, and their success would be attributed to G-d’s might rather than their own ability. Clearly, these are not the ideas of a people who think they are better than other nations.
Because they were the first to be called by God to accept His covenant.
Adding on from the previous, starting with the call of Abraham by God.
Muslims are born and raised to be perpetually offended, and journalists are carefully trained to detect even invisible causes for offense even in the most liberal of republicans, but Romney made it particularly easy for both groups. Romney’s worst flaw in his statement was its exact truth - followed by the offense of saying something nice about the Jews that liberals so thoroughly despise.
I was in Damman Saudi Arabia several years ago and could not help noticing that the saudis import people from other Asian countries like Pakistan,and the Philipines to do the real work that keeps the country running like road repair and construction. Even themanagement of the hotel I stayed in was performed by a Pakistani, while the Saudi manager sat in his office and drank tea.
A functioning green house operation was given to the Palestininans some years ago and the promptly tore it to pieces.
That's very true, and its actually because of a structural flaw in their "religion," which was really conceived of by its founder as a simple way of extending the domination and control of his violent bandit tribe over the disunited and weakened ME territories after the fall of the Roman Empire. Add this to the fact that successive heresies had broken up Eastern Christian unity, and you had kingdoms or tribes that were defended neither militarily nor spiritually against this agressive force cloaked as a new religion.
Islam means submission, and Muslims are very passive in their daily lives, leaving everything to whatever Islamic ruler dominates them, following a religion where God is unknowable and unpredictable and where the believer can only try to stave off the anger of the god or gods by following a detailed ritual law, and where the arbitrary and unknowable will of this god governs all things and your own efforts are of no avail and even offend your god.
There is nothing wrong with Middle Easterners that the removal of Islam wouldn't cure. Remember that some of these cultures (Persia, Babylon, etc.) produced great learning and scientific discoveries...all of which would last for only about two generations after their conquest by Islam, and then the culture would descend to being the usual Islamic pit of ignorance and superstition and anger.
Even in those rare cases where a conquered people was subjugated but use was made of its knowledge, it was because the form of Islam practiced by the ruler happened to be a syncretist variant, which was then determined by orthodox Muslims to be heretical. The result, then as now, was that it was actually the Muslims themselves who attacked and overthrew these more moderate rulers.
The root of the problem is Islam. What you believe does make a difference.
Every moment spent in an Arab country brings to mind the scripture: “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles.” It is a shame. If not for Islam conquering their ancestors and converting the survivors by force, those people might have had a good life with a positive culture.
It all goes back to their belief in God, but not the son of God. The Last Days - the Judgement - they are accounted for their belief in God - what they have endured and learned when they chose not to maintain the standards of God -
This is all contrary to those that prop up false prophets like say, Muhammad.
I’m Catholic - and have no problem with my Jewish brothers — I do have serious concerns and issues with Islam!
Palestine, Allah fearing country. Per capita income: $2900/year. Source.
Israel, God fearing country. Per capita income: $31,400/year. Source.
Gee, I wonder, since these countries share a border, why there's such a big difference?
Could it be they expend all their energy and resources trying to kill Israelis? Nah!
I have recently what exactly happened to the Armenians under the Turks - it was much more horrific than I ever imagined. And I also read recently how in 1999 UNICEF worked to stop Christian charities from trying to rescue people that were made slaves by the Sudanese regime.
I am reading Howard Sachar’s “A history of Israel” at the moment and wonder a bit about its accuracy. His claim is that the collectivist farms were more efficient than the “capitalist” farms in the period that leads up to WWI. I wonder if this is true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.