Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warning – SB 249 is California’s Worst Gun Confiscation Threat in 20 Years
Ammoland ^ | 10 August, 2012 | NRA-ILA

Posted on 08/11/2012 7:07:03 AM PDT by marktwain

Charlotte, NC --(Ammoland.com)- Senator Leland Yee of San Francisco now trying to ban and confiscate more so-called “assault weapons.”

Originally, Senate Bill 249 was a quiet agriculture bill that passed in the California Senate back in May.

With sneaky back-door tactics, Senator Yee turned the bill into a gun ban monster.

SB 249, as amended, would make a small but profound change to the definition of what constitutes a detachable magazine for a semiautomatic firearm. By doing so, hundreds of thousands of semi-automatic rifles, which were legally sold in California over the last decade, would become illegal on July 1, 2013.

The existing definition of detachable magazine was used by Governor Brown’s administration for the four years he served as Attorney General.

Senator Yee’s bill has no provisions to allow permitting, licensing or reimbursement for the loss of valuable property. Worse yet, the bill doesn’t require a public notice program to advise owners of this change in state law.

Thousands of owners could be arrested for inadvertent violations. If you own an affected firearm, your only choices would be to destroy it, surrender it to a law enforcement agency, sell it out of state or have it confiscated at the time of your arrest! Which option would you prefer?

Call AND E-mail your state legislators TODAY and urge them to OPPOSE SB 249

* Contact information for your state Senator can be found here.

* Contact information for your state Assembly Member can be found here.

Also, contact Governor Jerry Brown and urge him to tell the state Legislature that he stands by the existing definition of detachable magazine,just as he did when he was Attorney General.

Governor Brown can be reached at 916-445-2841 and by e-mail at: http://gov.ca.gov/m_contact.php

Please forward this alert to your family, friends and fellow gun owners across California and urge them to do the same.

California is going to need EVERYONE to help fend off this attack!

About: Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; ban; banglist; ca; democrats; govtabuse; sb249; tyranny
Links at the site.
1 posted on 08/11/2012 7:07:16 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

California has been imploding at a quickening rate for decades. It’s a pathetic joke and going south from there.

Children, this is what government looks like on crack.

Forty years of Democrat control of our state legislature sure has worked wonders.


2 posted on 08/11/2012 7:16:11 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It’s their feelings of guilt that have them fear guns so.


3 posted on 08/11/2012 7:22:12 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

Ultimate, you may be right.


4 posted on 08/11/2012 7:25:48 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

Ultimately [SAT], you may be right.


5 posted on 08/11/2012 7:26:10 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
My current company was founded in Silicon Valley, and has been a big mover/shaker in CA for over 20 years. However, whispers in the wind indicate it may be considering moving a lot of it's operations out of CA due to the oppressive, expensive, and repressive business climate. I have no doubt that additional crap like this is only going to hasten CA's demise. I was asked to consider moving there, and it took all of a nanosecond to turn the offer down.

IL, NY, MI are not far behind...

6 posted on 08/11/2012 7:29:55 AM PDT by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubh_Ghlase

I agree with your take on things.

I’m not moving out of state either.


7 posted on 08/11/2012 7:42:01 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

FO CA. My feet, my wallet, my business and my guns walked. Don’t care anymore what they do.


8 posted on 08/11/2012 8:01:28 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I wonder if this would include the Winchester Model 100 and the Remington Model 742 and the Ruger 10-22. These are just a few of the “sporting” rifles that use a “clip” or “magazine”. Seems like we always have to get some nit-wit who doesn’t know his a$$ from page 6 in the phone book to come up with another stupid idea about guns.
9 posted on 08/11/2012 8:07:48 AM PDT by Gertie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Thousands of owners could be arrested for inadvertent violations. If you own an affected firearm, your only choices would be to destroy it, surrender it to a law enforcement agency, sell it out of state or have it confiscated at the time of your arrest! Which option would you prefer?

The other option is to move away from California, which is what I did 18 years ago. I saw this garbage coming a long way off (since '89).

10 posted on 08/11/2012 9:47:36 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I did not think you could have a detachable magazine in CA. And I live in anti-gun Mass. We look at CA and say, “at least we are not as bad as them!”


11 posted on 08/11/2012 2:31:21 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I just hate our government. All of them. Republican and Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If passed, don't obey.
When enforced, shoot them.

End of problem.

The Kenyan must go.

12 posted on 08/11/2012 2:34:59 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

I always try to live within the laws of our nation.

Our sentiments are similar though.


13 posted on 08/11/2012 2:44:24 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"I always try to live within the laws of our nation."

I prefer living within the founders intent, not the laws.

The Kenyan must go.

14 posted on 08/11/2012 2:46:13 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson