Obama Surreptitiously Implementing a Radical Plan to DESTROY American Suburbs

Reaganite Republican ^ | August 15, 2012 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

High fuel prices... redistributive taxes... electric cars with a 30 mi range

It should come to no surprise to any casual observer of US politcs that Barack Obama and his 'progressive' ilk hate suburbanites almost as much as they do clingers,
save some residual hope-n-changey soccer moms out there in the greenbelt, maybe.

But if a new book by Stanley Kurtz has any truth to it, the Obama Administration abhors the actual, physical suburbs that produce these irritatingly self-confident types, too- and have already actively targeted the suburban lifestyle -glittering icon of the American standard-of-living the world over- for destruction. 

Typical of this despicable regime's m.o. -and as with Obamacare and the rest of his stealthy power/$ grabs- the true goals are spun, obfuscated, or denied outright.

Yet the minute Kurtz' Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities hit the bookshelves last week, a photo of Obama with radical, racially-obsessed urbanist group Building One America's president Mike Kruglik was promptly scrubbed from the BWA website (it showed them meeting right in the Oval Office,cached -here-). Kruglik also once sat on the board of a group that first hired Barack Obama as a community organizer back in Illinois, and has even been described as a CO 'mentor' to the young Obama.

Since these suburban swing-voters represent many of those Obama must charm in order to eek out a win in November, the last thing on Earth he needs is them knowing he's out to force them to give up their lawn/garden and move into a crime-plagued downtown condo: but we know why the orders went down to cover his tracks like they did with ACORN.

________________________________________________________________________________

Kurtz on the anti-suburban strategy:

One approach is to force suburban residents into densely packed cities by blocking development on the outskirts of metropolitan areas, and by discouraging driving with a blizzard of taxes, fees, and regulations. 

Step two is to move the poor out of cities by imposing low-income-housing quotas on development in middle-class suburbs. 

Step three is to export the controversial 'regional tax-base sharing' scheme currently in place in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area to the rest of the country. Under this program, a portion of suburban tax money flows into a common regional pot, which is then effectively redistributed to urban, and a few less well-off 'inner-ring suburban, municipalities.

________________________________________________________________________________

Alas, the Obama White House may not have to keep their intentions secret forever... as with most other contentious issues of the day, all you have to do is give Dear Leader a second term and *presto* you'll get to see 'what's in it' (think complete and utter contempt for your opinion while implementing a warped agenda far more radical than anything you've seen so far and you'll likely be close...).

Note that Barack Obama has long advocated urban 'regionalism'... where suburban areas are rolled-up into larger political/fiscal/tax structures and government, so as to dilute suburban towns' independence in every way- all the easier to spread-the-wealth-around and control with a political machine, doncha know.

____________________________________________________________

Castillo Chronicles   Conservatoons   Breitbart   LP   Pinterest

[Reaganite Republican]

*** PING ***

[tom paine 2]

Already happening in the Chicago area. The Regional Transit Authority and redeployment of welfare recipients to the suburbs has been going on for quite a while.

[cradle of freedom]

Many suburbanites moved out from the cities, so many of them have the curse of multi-generational Democrat voting, lets hope that they figure things out real quick. The commie Dems hate self sufficient people living in their own homes and driving their own cars. They have already invaded the suburbs with the Section 8 housing which Republicans should vote down if they have any spine. Can local towns opt out of Section 8?

[Reaganite Republican]

“Can local towns opt out of Section 8?”

GOOD question- because forcing low-income housing on formerly nice neighborhoods is a MAJOR element of this anti-suburban Obama scheme, as I understand it

[Buckeye McFrog]

Here in the Pittsburgh area, under a nearly two-decade old court case called the Saunders Decree, the county housing authority has been FORCED to spend taxpayer money on pricey suburban homes in the nicer areas of town and relocate minority Section 8 tenants there.

[Reaganite Republican]

It’s like a bussing program for housing

[wrench]

Don’t think the administration isn’t trying to convert all those foreclosed and unsaleable suburban homes into section 8 units.

A trial program of “renting” foreclosed homes back to former owners is just the first step (and already up and running). Get the organization up and running, then move the former owners out and the sec8 folks in.

[Grams A]

They did the same thing with educational funding many years ago in Texas. Areas that enjoyed tax benefits from their local industries kept their tax income in their area, had awesome schools and low real estate taxes whereas areas that had no industry had marginal schools and high real estate taxes. Now that we all “share and share alike”, real estate taxes are higher everywhere and nearly all the public school are performing poorly.

The current plan by BO is just another verse of the same song.

[RedMDer]

[RatRipper]

I know a guy who used to work for the agency that administered the federal housing program for one moderately-sized southern city. The budget was $50,000,000 annually for housing supplements IN THE CITY ALONE! And this city is not on the same scale as an Atlanta, New Orleans or Miami. Imagine what this is on a national scale. The federal government has gone far, far, far beyond tyranny. This is evil on an unimaginable scale.

[sweetiepiezer]

FYI

Scrubbed: Photo of President Obama Removed Just Days After Book Exposes Agenda to Eliminate Suburbs

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/11/Scrubbed-Photo-of-President-Obama-Removed-Just-Days-After-Book-Exposes-Agenda-To-Eliminate-Suburbs

[cradle of freedom]

Towns and states have to start thinking about opting out of as many Lyndon Johnson programs as possible. We are only losing more of our hard earned money, we are supporting more Democrat bureaucrats in the Dems’ political machine and we are empowering those bureaucrats to stick their noses in our businesses taking away our rights.

[cradle of freedom]

Is it any wonder that we owe 15 trillion?