Posted on 08/22/2012 5:07:23 AM PDT by Travis McGee
Our military planners are openly discussing how to kill "Tea Party extremists" who have taken over a small town in the USA. Is this "operational lay-down" merely a "cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario," as described by The Washington Times, or is it something much more malevolent?
The military scenario appears in the July 25, 2012 issue of the respected Small Wars Journal and posits that, while Obama will be thrown out of office in 2012, ten years of race- and immigrant-bashing by "right-wing demagogues" will have whipped white Americans into gang-like attacks on non-whites.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/wargaming_termination_of_tea_party_extremists.html#ixzz24HANT56n
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’m not willing to give up one square inch of American soil to socialists.
Being in Texas, I figured I knew most details about Waco. Now you can give some substantiation to your previously not heard “UK airforce participation” claim?
To me, Waco was just another klintoon/liberal attack by FBI that didn’t give a damn about the Constitution.
If it is one state versus the feds, we will lose. You need to recognize this attack when it comes, it may not look like what you expect. Be prepared to wage asymetrical warfare and win on another front. (Hint: Louisiana is where the concept of home schooling was born.)
“In my opinion the US armed forces would not fight against other Americans. They would lay down their arms first! The military is sworn to first uphold the Constitution and second obey all LAWFUL orders.”
I agree with that, but if it should come to that I think UN troops would be called in. Countries who hate the US would jump at the chance to come here and kill Americans.
Based on history - and common sense - I posit that small-government, freedom-loving, family-oriented organizations will never initiate violent rebellions against their own constitutional republics as long as those that serve in government have as their foundation the sovereignty of “We the people”.
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”
Yet, they think that white people are the enemy.
I see your scenario as what is likely to occur, if we are pushed into it by the likes of nobama.
Once it begins, many States they call Blue, will join in and eventually the few remaining with the Fed will be the broke, over unionized and liberal States that at some point will come begging to either USA2 or to EU (probably EU first because of the kinship of mind).
Yeah, it's not hard to do. Even here, where you think you are safe.
Be advised FRiends, never post anything on the Internet that you do not want traced right to your front door and computer.
Comments posted here, or on FB or anywhere online are like a bullet fired - once you hit , it's like pulling a trigger and it cannot be recalled.
They know who you are, see:
↑ Your IP Address traces right to your computer!
“Long unbroken line of planning.”
Going back to Ruby Ridge and George Herbert Walker Bush.
At the highest levels both parties have collaborated on this nascent police state for a generation now. We have had an unbroken string of globalist and statist presidents since 1989. We will have another one in 2013, no matter the election outcome.
Not just here...
Ex-Marine Arrested and held for Facebook Posts - Not charged with a crime. Held in psychiatric hospital because the government did not like his posts.
The UN or other countries who come here will have to relearn the lesson of Concord, as we patriotic Americans will not go peacefully, not unlike the movie Red Dawn.
The asymeterical battles will be the foreign troops being up against 100 million better armed than they with a much firmer will to win.
If any invasion, it will be on the liberal Fed States who will rollover.
My personal view is none of this will be made necessary as America quits bending over backwards giving the benefit of the doubt and retakes control from the liberal and RINO establishment, not unlike WW2 or the Cold War.
If you need proof, go check how the politicial atmosphere was in Germany particularily from 1934 on. As the National Socialist Worker's Party, aided by Gerbbles, the propgand minister and others, made the Jews more and more scapegoats of all of Germany's problems.
As it stands now Conservatives, paricularily Christian Conservatives are being named as the cause of all wrongs. In time,all Whites and those who identify with them will be included.The attacks by the media are going to increase in volume, intensity ,and content until the desired results are achieved.
Travis, I have to ask, what’s it like seeing your cautionary fiction come to life? Must set your mind spinning at times.
A peceeful parting of the ways ain’t going to happen. The masters wil not willing let their slaves, whose earnings and work they depend to live high on the hog, depart. They have no intentions of letting their slaves go, they may reduce the number of said slaves, but those remaining will have their tasks doubled.
“A peaceful parting of the ways ain’t going to happen. The masters wil not willing let their slaves, whose earnings and work they depend to live high on the hog, depart. They have no intentions of letting their slaves go, they may reduce the number of said slaves, but those remaining will have their tasks doubled.”
Not unless sovereign bankruptcy kept most of the goons in barracks, as happened during the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Politburo. More likely though, our breakup would resemble the chaos of Yugoslavia’s dissolution, on a continental scale.
And again the Tea Party is violent but the window breaking, police car pooping, wall spraying, homeless shoving, tent raping, occupy isn’t mentioned or treated as peaceful.
Well, I’m not surprised, at least.
There is a balance to be maintained, there.
It is not a question of whether segments of the Conservative population would defend, with any means necessary, their way of life and indeed, their lives and those of their loved ones.
It is a question of whether that segment would seek the violent overthrow of the legitimate Government.
The danger comes in where the assumption is made that those who would defend are actively seeking revolt, and while there may be a rare few who would revolt for minor causes, I think the general case is that the vast majority of people would reserve such options for a last resort.
The other danger, is that so much effort would be put forth to 'prove nonviolent aims', that that the option of revolt in extremis, becomes removed from the public psyche.
The credible power the masses hold over government is not at the ballot box, but the ability to forcibly, if necessary, revoke such consent as given there, should the situation warrant.
Government should have a healthy, rational, fear of its constituents, such is the first check to unbridled power.
When government irrationally pursues the means to forcibly remove any perceived source of that fear rather than control its own aims, ambitions, and usurpations, it is a sign that something is grievously wrong with the mindset of our servants in the public sector, military or civilian.
I disagree.
The military mind will have its own set of ‘darned if I do, darned if I don’t’ set of compasses going off.
Should the economy be as it is now, the so-called grunt that would have to be called to duty, will have that old argument, nation or career, or job or no money. If it has come to that, those of us whom this grunt might have at the end of his/her barrel, might be unlucky.
There is also the fact that a lot of military members are members of international gangs, with their own mental spin on this situation, which I do not have the data to project what is in their collective hive-mentality brain.
Lastly, how many of the military grunts we may indeed be facing, have as their personal philosophies, those wondrous words spoken by Louis Farrakhan, the Black Panthers, or other great minds of the black separatist groups? Would those folks be acting ‘under orders’, or acting out their beliefs?
ANY military action against American civilians, could or would become the “Lexington/Concord spark”. We have a sitting President that enjoys acting in the manner of King George III. We have a media, that attempts to shout down anyone that says “the king has no clothes”. We have a nation of stoop-sitters, with their hand out, waitng on the benevolence of the king, and who swears their allegiance, and forfeits their freedom to him, for a loaf of bread, acarton of eggs, and a jar of milk (don’t forget the cellphone). All these ingredients wear on those Americans who know what this country was, before 2008, and what the wasted and spoiled potential is, due to this Fascist king.
I, for one, do NOT swear ANYTHING, to this sitting President, because he has not the mettle. As a military veteran, I call this man a metrosexual eunuch. His name deserves the same ‘reverence’ as a man named Haman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.