Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Requiring photo ID is “racist,” except when it’s done by the NAACP, Eric Holder, unions, Obama, etc.
wordpress ^ | September 4, 2012 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

Posted on 09/04/2012 6:25:55 AM PDT by grundle

Requiring photo ID is “racist,” except when it’s done by the NAACP, Eric Holder’s Justice Department, unions, Obama’s campaign events, and other liberal organizations

Requiring photo ID is either racist – or not racist. It can’t be both.

Unfortunately, there is a huge double standard by those who claim that such a requirement is racist.

At a recent NAACP event, NAACP President Ben Jealous claimed that requiring voter ID was racist. However, at that very same event, the NAACP required photo ID in order to get into the event in the first place.

Eric Holder and the Justice Department blocked Texas’s voter ID requirement, claiming that it was racist. However, the very same Justice Department requires photo ID for everyone who enters. So let’s say that someone is denied their right to vote because they don’t have voter ID, and they want to file a lawsuit at the Justice Department. But because they don’t have photo ID, they can’t get into the Justice Department in the first place.

In this video, beginning at 2:39, we see that the Justice Department requires photo ID for everyone who enters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZf25pmgR4c&feature=player_embedded

The same video also shows that you need photo ID in order to enter other organizations which claim that requiring voter ID is racist, including the Advancement Project (at 1:38), the Center for American Progress (2:08), and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (2:23).

This article from Politico includes the following photograph of a labor union that requires photo ID in order for its members to vote – but liberals don’t accuse this union of being racist:

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, India, and South Africa all require photo ID in order to vote – but U.S. liberals don’t consider those countries’ requirements to be racist.

Illinois recently passed a law which requires buyers of drain cleaner to show photo ID – but liberals don’t accuse this requirement of being racist.

Michelle Obama requires photo ID in order to attend her book signings – but liberals don’t accuse her of being racist.

Barack Obama requires photo ID in order to attend his campaign events – but liberals don’t accuse him of being racist.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/04/2012 6:26:00 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

nice presentation for the courts showing how photo Id does not present hardship.


2 posted on 09/04/2012 6:29:39 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

As he is so capable of doing, Daniel Greenfield describes what “racism” is all about in today’s political world.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/


3 posted on 09/04/2012 6:31:26 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It is only ‘racist’ when there isn’t a government check involved.


4 posted on 09/04/2012 6:39:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

So we can assume that cops asking for ID when they pull you over are racist too?
I’d like the courts and the DNC to explain that to me, how it’s racist to ask for ID to vote, yet not racist for unions and law enforcement to require ID.
It’s insane that we need ID for the DMV, and various other things, yet we don’t require ID to elect the leader of the free world?


5 posted on 09/04/2012 6:48:36 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
So we can assume that cops asking for ID when they pull you over are racist too?

only in AZ and if they work for Maricopa County...

6 posted on 09/04/2012 7:34:37 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

It is only ‘racist’ when there isn’t a government check involved.

Yep. The same people not required to have a ID to vote need one for food stamps, welfare, and fema money. In otherwords, couldn’t exist without showing an ID but to vote for president of the USA - no need to show you are who you are of if you are even a citizen. Democrats are a very slezy bunch.


7 posted on 09/04/2012 7:42:52 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

That would be LOL material if it weren’t spot on.
Pretty sad that life has overtaken satire.


8 posted on 09/04/2012 8:02:51 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

I would call a lot of Republican’s sleazy as well.

The one sure litmus test to tell if the devil’s hand is at work in an issue is the presence of double standards.


9 posted on 09/04/2012 10:07:03 AM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Since elections can be influenced by fraudulent votes, it is necessary to have positive identification. Remember ACORN is alive and well, even under several names.
10 posted on 09/04/2012 10:24:30 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (Layte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson