Posted on 10/09/2012 7:56:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Deeply embarrassing, but not entirely the campaign’s fault. If memory serves, Romney’s Big Bird line was the thin reed to which liberals on Twitter were clinging the morning after the Denver debacle:
“There’s been a strong grassroots outcry over the attacks on Big Bird. This is something that mothers across the country are alarmed about, and you know, we’re tapping into that,” Psaki told reporters aboard Air Force One on Wednesday…
“The larger point… is, aside from our love for Big Bird and Elmo, as is evidenced by the last few days, the point that we’re making here is that when Mitt Romney… was given the opportunity to lay out how he would address the deficit, when he said ‘I will take a serious approach to it,’ his first offering was to cut funding for Big Bird,” Psaki said. “And that is absurd and hard to take seriously his specific plan.”
Two problems. First, needless to say, Romney’s point about PBS isn’t that serious deficit reduction should start there, it’s that not even popular federal outlays should be immune from cuts in the name of restoring fiscal stability. A guy who bet his presidential candidacy on Paul Ryan is about as serious as an American politician can get when it comes to spending. And let me gently suggest to Team O that any campaign that treats the Buffett Rule as an important budgetary reform shouldn’t wag its finger too sternly in criticizing others for half-measures. Second, the Big Bird ad is actually very typical of Hopenchange’s M.O. this year. They’ve tried to bludgeon Romney with every cheap demagogic populist ploy within reach. How were they supposed to lay off an easy opportunity to suggest that Mitt hates moms and kids and puppets? What’s unusual about the spot isn’t that it’s trivial, it’s that they released it at a moment of real momentum for Romney, which in turn makes them look desperate and inept. Per Sean Trende’s superb analysis today at RCP, it’s very important to Obama’s campaign that they be seen as winning at all times. A winner can get away with a silly ad like this; a guy who just got his ass handed to him in front of 70 million people really can’t. Trende:
I’ve superimposed the major events of the 2012 cycle here. The basic trend line is fairly plain. Over time, the president’s lead gradually deteriorates. When it gets too close, he makes a major play to change the dynamic, pushing the lead back up…
I do think there is a degree to which Team Obama has successfully (and quite frankly brilliantly) created a “virtuous cycle” this election. There are three ways in which this is the case.
First, the bandwagon effect affects fundraising. Once you move outside the partisan core, people like to back winners. This is especially true of the business community. By assiduously cultivating its front-runner status, the Obama campaign has aided its ability to press future arguments.
Second, maintaining a lead allows greater leeway in the arguments it can make. Something like the “cancer ad” from August looks hard-hitting from a campaign that is leading (and I certainly include candidate super PACs as part of the “campaign”), but would probably be described as “desperate” from one that is losing.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, it affects press portrayals of the candidates and party enthusiasm. This is the most important thing here: I still think the default expectation here has been that Obama should be losing.
In other words, every time the basics of the economy and the deficit and some new foreign-policy debacle start to eat into Obama’s lead, he latches on to a new shiny object that can boost his lead by a few points — until the basics (“gravity,” in Trende’s phrasing) start to drag him down again. The more consistently he’s seen as a winner, the more Romney smells like a loser, which has all of the self-fulfilling effects that Trende describes above. The reason the debate was such a killer was that it shattered that perception of Obama’s invincibility that he’d spent the last nine months cultivating. And the last thing you want to do once that’s happened is make yourself seem ridiculous by running a silly ad that’s transparently an attempt to change the subject — especially if you got elected the first time by scolding people for the “smallness” of their politics. Watch the two clips below, the first via the Examiner and the second via the Right Scoop, and see for yourself who looks small now. Just look at what this guy’s “new kind of politics” nonsense has become. Click the image to watch.
(VIDEOS AT LINK)
LOL! I think they had to do it because Le Var Burton
was OUTRAGED! disenfranchised poor children blah,blah!
Real Americans will vote NO CONFIDANCE on Nov.6!!
On top of this,which is just silly, but useful for ridicule
comes the unraveling of the Benghazi debacle.
“his first offering was to cut funding for Big Bird”
Lying is in their blood.
I don’t remember word for word, but Romney said he would cut out non-essentials, which includes funding for PBS.
Then he threw in that he likes Jim Lehrer and Big Bird — but we don’t need to borrow (now we know it’s 444 million) from China to fund an organization that does not need taxpayer funds!
How difficult is this to understand? Big Bird / Sesame Street is a huge money maker and we are broke.
Today’s “Obama Street”....
Brought to you by the letter “Pee” and the number “zero”...
I guess the Dems thought that making an issue of Romney’s comment about cutting funds for Public TV, hence, Big Bird’s slice of the taxpayer’s pie would be their “October Surprise.” That ad was planned to enrage the grassroots who drink their kool-aid and believe in make-believe. But, instead of Big Bird becoming the banner carrier for Obama over the next few weeks...he turned out to be nothing more than another dumb turkey.
Getting his street gred on, how to get to Sesame Street.
BS they did- They released it because they thought they could attack Romney with it and it backfired- So damn sick of the LIES of this administration and everyoen associated with it!
So they led from behind again.
This is a Private Album
Please enter the password from album riverbrat_photos to view this private album.
Should tell them to cook their stupid bird for dinner and get rid of it!
If Romney can go gaffe free these last 4 weeks, I think he has the popular vote sewed up. EV's???? not so certain. Romney absolutely has to pull out Ohio, Florida, and Virginia. Hard to guage how much liberal electoral fraud will sway this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.