Thoughts on the recent election..

I think that the results from this election appear as they do because there was a massive, unprecedented amount of vote fraud that took place. Unfortunately, where Democrats are concerned, you tend to expect that a warping of the true results of an election will take place. Nevertheless, vote fraud is not something that can easily be accounted for in pre-election polling and prognostication. Make no mistake—this election was defrauded, and stolen, by the Democrats on a massive scale. Either that, or math has stopped working.

Sorry folks, this election was stolen, which means Obama is not legitimately the President of the United States, birth certificate or no birth certificate.

Another way you can tell that fraud took place? Look at the discrepancy between the type of election that had to have taken place to get the results we had, and the kind of election that actually did take place.

The county in Florida which Rep. Allen West was contesting had more voter turnout than voters. Pre-election threads detailed others in Ohio.

Sorry, that doesn't jive with this: http://enight.elections.myflorida.com/CountyReportingStatus/ No county with more than 83%. The county that West was contesting (St. Lucie) had 70% turnout.

The Philly Romney zero vote streak means there was at least some coaching there. Kicking out the Republican observers makes it all but certain there was something like that. For the rest of your allegations, they seem to be as weak as your Florida allegation.

When I click through the Patriot08 links I get to mostly link pool websites. I click those and get to conservative news sites (mostly legit). But those typically link to a new story which points out what a mess the Ohio rolls are, but can't equate that to fraud or a reasonable potential. DId those inactive voters still on the rolls in Ohio come out and vote? Nobody can really say. A bogus voter would still have to produce a form of ID with an address (e.g. bank statement) so the bar isn't very high. But unlike Philly I assume there were R observers there.

Bottom line is there is some evidence of fraud in the Philly results that could be coaching or worse. There is a lot of innuendo and some false allegations (e.g. yours about Florida). It is fairly obvious that despite some fraud we lost this election square (without the fair). Eliminating the fraud, such as I have seen, would not have elected Romney. My Virginia observations bear this out.

Thank you so much for all your posts and work here regarding election fraud.

I wrote, signed, called and tried to bump threads to get this issue noticed by all.

I too believe this election was stolen. I resent having any conversation having to do with “what do conservatives do now?”, without first admitting and accepting the vast amount of fraud that just occurred.

What we do now is everything possible to stop this fraud from happening in the first place. Try to stop this election from being certified. And push conservative values even more next time. No pandering to the illegal aliens, no pandering to those that want hand-outs, and no pandering to people who pigeon hole Americans into groups.

Easy peazy, lemon squeezy.. right?

With all due respect, bulls***.

Is it a “libtard” approach to life to ignore crime? To let criminal acts go unnoticed, unpunished, and therefore allow them to continue and in fact, encourage them?

With massive election fraud, the Perfect Candidate could run and still lose. And, in fact, will; unless the Republicans get some BALLS and moral courage and adhere to Constitutional principles and the rule of law!

There is more than one reason for our problems:

1. The commies run most all institutions especially the MSM.

2. They are criminal SOBS and not only fight dirty but will fight dirtier and dirtier IF THEY ARE NOT STOPPED.

3. The R party is a bunch of self serving eunuchs who will not stand up for the Constitution and the rule of law, other than a very few such as Allen West.

Ignoring the first two parts of the problem ensures continued defeat and the continuance of the third.

Your use of the “conspiracy theories” nonsense shows that you are part of the problem and in fact I’ve noticed your comments over time; IMHO you probably voted for 0moslem.

This author makes very cogent arguments for the strong likielihood of voter fraud and goes through the various types of fraud and cheating documented in targeted localities in the swing states.

But, apparently, like all too many "conservatives," he implicitly accepts the criminal activities of the fraudsters as if we just have to take them lying down. It's OK for him to discuss substantive changes that should be made within the GOP - which are well taken - but he doesn't come up with any specific proposals to safeguard the integrity of the elections, which he knows was compromised. Such ideas seem to be a taboo in many "conservative" circles:

So here are a few:

(1) Photo voter ID cards with bar codes which are swiped every time they are used at an election (similar to the technology used at ATMs). Preferably this bar code info will be processed by a national voter data center - although in the alternative it could work on a state level as well. The main function of this technology would be to prevent the holder of the card from voting more than once in an election. The photo feature would tend to prevent fraudsters from using someone else's card.

(2) Documentation of identity and of citizenship and residence before allowing voter registration.

(3) Eliminate early voting.

(4) Eliminate same day registration.

(5) Eliminate "Motor Voter."

(6) Periodic purging of voter registration lists to eliminate those who have died, who have moved, or are otherwise ineligible.

(7) Criminal prosecutions and convictions of fraudsters and various other cheats.

(8) Technical upgrades of electronic vote counting and tabulation devices to make them more tamper-proof and more difficult to hack. (If necessary, get rid of optical scanners and go back to paper ballots which are counted visually with representatives of all candidates present. Better delays in reporting the results than having the results determined by cheating.)

BTW, the author correctly comments on the low intelligence levels of all too many voters. One way of upgrading that general intelligence level of the voting population is to make it a little more complex and perhaps a little more inconvenient to cast a ballot. That would tend to weed out more of the lower IQ participants.

Let the lying and cheating 'Rats complain all they want; the fact is that they have stealthily set up an electoral system which aids and abets their criminal activities.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.