Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Ann Barnhardt been arrested by the Feds?
Barnhardt.biz ^

Posted on 12/18/2012 10:36:38 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Hot Tabasco

whoa there HotT,

where did you get the idea that she thinks she can legally not pay her taxes???

she is not paying her taxes because of the moral imperative of not paying her taxes.

good grief man did you actually read what she said regarding her not paying her taxes?

she is taking a principled moral stand and is asking the IRS to put her in prison.

my guess is that it will be too inconvenient for the gov to put her in jail so maybe the gov has something else planned for her.

who knows?

Lurking’


61 posted on 12/18/2012 5:00:27 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All
I emailed Ann this morning, and she never responded. I emailed her twice in the past, and she responded within minutes both times.

Wherever she is, she doesn't have her iPhone with her.

62 posted on 12/18/2012 5:15:16 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Bfl


63 posted on 12/18/2012 5:17:28 PM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Bfl


64 posted on 12/18/2012 5:17:28 PM PST by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Others have tried to do the same thing and have found themselves in prison for it. They will definitely try her for tax evasion of she does.

She's not doing it because she wants to avoid taxes. She's doing it because she considers the feral government to be engaging in criminal activities and it is therefore immoral to pay them. She wants them to take her to court. She wants to be a martyr.

65 posted on 12/18/2012 5:23:59 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
whoa there HotT,

where did you get the idea that she thinks she can legally not pay her taxes???

she is not paying her taxes because of the moral imperative of not paying her taxes.

she is taking a principled moral stand and is asking the IRS to put her in prison.

Well then, I stand corrected. Since she's asking for it, what is the problem here?????


66 posted on 12/18/2012 5:31:27 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Jab her with a harpoon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

I haven’t given this administration a dime nor will I.

You all can do whatever.


67 posted on 12/18/2012 6:14:44 PM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Anybody ring her up?

Toll Free - 1 (888) 799-4577 (weekdays, evenings and weekends)

Emergency Back-up Phone Number - (720) 331-2324


68 posted on 12/18/2012 6:22:08 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; E. Pluribus Unum; Admin Moderator

Post 15 was not a sufficient reply? You did not get nothing- you got a series of links to her stated positions. Obviously did not reference them for fact and background—bothersome things, those. Fail to find the humor in any of this.

Puerile expression substituted for any helpful content is more the kind of thing one expects from low level apparatchiks or civil servants. Spare us the flatus and the ad hominems. Shinola is calling: http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/114000.html

Thanks EPluribusUnum for the attempt.

Deo Vindice.


69 posted on 12/18/2012 7:09:20 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ok, I just watched the entire video series and I am sufficiently freaked out. The house of cards will collapse upon a black swan event, if I read it all correctly. USA, Europe, the world.


70 posted on 12/18/2012 8:12:18 PM PST by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

Our country is being run by a pack of psychos.


71 posted on 12/18/2012 8:17:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Our country is being run by a pack of psychos

Satan said to Eve: ..."and you shall be like God (or a god, another interpretation)"...and Washington DC collectively said, "I want some of that!"

72 posted on 12/19/2012 3:45:18 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby
Actually, I found post #16 to be more informative, because it informed me that somewhere on that acre of BS that is her website is a copy of the lien. (I still can't find it, but I'll keep trying, because I'm honestly curious).

I remain sceptical that the IRS has slapped a lien on her simply because of her November 7, 2012 (6:23 PM MST) post. Failing to pay your 2012 taxes is not a "crime" until April 16, 2013. Announcing that you will not pay your 2012 taxes in November of the same year is not a "crime." Increasing the number of the exemptions you claim is not a "crime."

Now, if Barnhardt is self-employed and is required to pay estimated quarterlies, it could conceivably result in a lien. Maybe telling others not to pay their taxes in the future is a criminal act. In both cases, there would be a record of a lien or an arrest.

To answer your question, post #15 was completely insufficient, and smelled of blog-pimping. I asked two questions in my comment #12, and I got links to 8(!) videos. In other words, I got a run-around. Maybe you should start using the portion of your anatomy that is "intellectually enhanced," and begin to understand the difference between an answer, and an answer that is a non-answer.

Oh, dear . . . was that an ad hominem? Maybe I should ask a Mod. [snort]

73 posted on 12/19/2012 3:45:43 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: All
I tried calling both of the phone numbers listed on Ann's website, and both of them rolled over to a full voice message box.

She's gone dark, and she evidently does not have access to her phones.

Could the ferals have classified her as a terrorist threat and renditioned her?

74 posted on 12/19/2012 7:28:44 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What you don’t get, and veteran activist conservatives here DO get (that would be people who HAVE fought for conservative values ALL their lives, in the courts and elsewhere against our tyrannical government) is that it is ENTIRELY possible to be federally harrassed under our Dear Leader and his fellow marxist atty general Holder. Electronically, financially, administratively— to mess with one’s business, and one’s banking and ultimately one’s livelihood and stability. There are many here trying to help Ann through our foundations, to fight the criminal enterprise that is this demonrat party and executive. In other words to take action, and not run our mouths.

You state “if Barnhardt is self-employed”. The creation and success of her company and the recent events of her company’s (and client’s) interactions with MF Global and the criminal actions of Corzine have been discussed on FR for quite a while. You are not informed on this individual, and so far, in your studious ignorance you have contributed little substantively other than pedestrian posting about IRS tax regs/ procedure and filings: armchair law dog fluff. We’re way beyond that.

Agree- you should take that definition up with the Moderator, and ask about long standing posting rules, to determine if you deserve any courtesy from your postings. Deo Vindice. Ask Him.


75 posted on 12/19/2012 1:01:04 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I fear this could be Ann’s fate:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_therapy


76 posted on 12/20/2012 2:32:09 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_V._Hansen


77 posted on 12/20/2012 2:34:28 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby
The reason I wrote if she is self-employed is because she might not be, in the eyes of the law. I simply don't know. The funny thing is, you don't either, (or you are too lazy to prove otherwise).

There's no other explanation for your false claims to authority, the slippery slope fallacies, and your reliance on a mythical lien in order to prove your arguments.

Please understand the word, "mythical" (since you do not own a dictionary): it might exist, but you and I have not seen it. Therefore, it is equally possible that dear Ann is feeding us a line of BS. I do not care that you think highly of her as an individual. I'd think more highly of her if she showed us what the lien is all about.

So she may be being harrassed by the IRS, or she may be engaged in criminal or civil tax fraud or tax evasion. It's that simple . . . you simply fail to comprehend the two equally-likely possibilities.

As for the "long-standing" posting rules, I am aware of them . . . I am also aware that discussions can get testy. I've managed my way through them well enough. You'll probably "mellow" as well, after you post 600 more threads, or 50,000 more comments (that was just an observation, nothing personal).

78 posted on 12/20/2012 7:49:16 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
Dude, I like a lot of what she says, but, c'mon, she's obviously nuts.

First time I heard of Ann was when I saw her explanation for giving up her business. It was obvious to me that she'd gone around the bend.

79 posted on 12/20/2012 4:45:14 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She’s back...she was in Rome.


80 posted on 12/21/2012 2:57:18 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson