Posted on 01/06/2013 9:13:10 AM PST by Nachum
From Godlike Productions Forum: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED! Two parents “Nick” and “Laura Phelps”
[link to edition.cnn.com]
“Nick and Laura Phelps also are struggling with what to tell their two children, a first-grader and a third-grader.”“When I saw those teachers, I locked eyes with them separately. If I could go back, I would embrace them,” Nick Phelps said, “because I had no idea what they had gone through.”
[not the guys in the video in that article]
(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...
Are there other players that are employees or major players with Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley?
Good question. Still looking... ;)
Alex Jones suggests that this is a coordinated attack on the United States on multiple fronts. The usage of the mass murders to push gun-control, attack the first amendment, and gain sympathy to other parts of the internationalist agenda.
Yes. Interesting questions. No question that we are being ‘played’ here. Like you, I am still looking.
Keep your powder dry. Pray a lot.
Some basic questions that demand answers:
How long has the plan been in affect?
Who is behind it?
Why?
I would. I would be inconsolable. I surely wouldn't be yuking it up at a press conference.
Though, I don't think these people are actors. (but I do think these mass shootings get a little start up help, if you get my drift)
I just think we are a nation of sociopaths. Many people unable to feel true emotion. Hence, this father.
[[Do you think anyone will ever take YOU seriously unless you learn how to type or speak English properly???]]
Actually yeah tobasco- LOTS of peopel do infact take m e seriously because they aren’t nearly aS Rude as you are- nor are they so obssessed with beign anally discombobulated by slightly mispelled words when the context is what actaully counts (well, at least to most people- some just can’t get beyond their own self-perceived perfection to concentrate on the context)- msot peopel udnerstand that there might be a problem and are polite enoguh to actually focus o nthe context of the arguments rather than obssessing over the delviery- but if you are too shallow to do so- well then whatever- that’s your problem-
That question is an interesting one. Agenda 21 is decades old. AND if one wants to, we can now begin to look all the way back to the Bobby Kennedy murder for potentially "programmed" murderers who are possibly hypnotized to commit specific acts of murder. There also competing interests here (I think). International communism is one. The international banking community is another. Religious extremism is yet another: The Masons (illuminati), Islam, Rome, and perhaps smaller or weaker players. Throw in moneyed interests from Big Oil, Big Media, and the Military and it adds up to some nasty violence.
Why?
That, IMHO is the easiest one to answer. Money and Power seasoned with a generous helping of bigotry, mindless hatred, and blood lust.
How does that sound?
I've seen him give three different accounts of his experience that day. One was he had just came out of his favorite diner for breakfast,(a daily habit) the second account he said he never made it to the diner, then he said he came out of his house and discovered frantic children screaming their teacher was gone....then I ran across this vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFyexz_IuHE
If you search his name on YT there are a lot of vids on this particular guy....very creepy.
There are a whole lot of things that make no sense. All those people seemed to be making it up as they went along.
That Gene Rosen was creepy and his story didn’t hold water. If they were with an adult teacher or bus driver in his front yard, why would they leave that adult that they knew to enter the house of a stranger — and why would an adult teacher/bus driver permit that.
Then there is that 3rd grade teacher who is gathering the kids together in a circle and yet never picks up her cell phone to call 911.
I have yet to see photos of the broken front window of the school.
And regarding the longgun in the trunk that they are checking out in the dark: Are you telling me that they waited 8-10 hours until it was dark to check his trunk??? That should have been the first thing checked — not something done 8-10 hours later.
Another thread here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2975543/posts
I seem to recall that the gun in the trunk was found early on in the day, at least I remember hearing it reported not long after the initial reports started coming in.
In the video of the cops removing it, it appears to be a semi auto shotgun. I could see a single woman owning a weapon like that for self defense but how many single women buy Bushmasters??
As someone else brought up, where are the pictures of the recovered weapons? Or any picture for that matter.
All we have is the reports that a Bushmaster was used and we've all seen how accurate most reports have turned out to be.
You are absolutely right when you say there are a whole lot of things that make no sense.
Oh, meant to say thanks for the other thread link, I’m going to check it out now.
Regarding the video that you saw — was it daylight or darkness???
The video that is now shown shows the trunk being opened in the darkness which had to have been atleast 8 hours after the shooting. They had a flood light shining into the trunk and the video of them doing so was taken from above — by helicopter. How was the helicopter so conveniently placed to capture the trunk opening and longgun discovery.
Was that the first time they looked into the trunk that day???
Yes, the one I saw was during night time. But I could swear I remember hearing they had discovered it very early into the investigation....like it was one of the first breaking discoveries.
I'm going to go look around and see if I can find any links with time stamps to verify that.
It was being reported that an AR 15 was found in the trunk, yet the video of the removal of the rifle is obviously not an AR 15.
The newscaster says this report is from FEDERAL officials.
You don’t need a time stamp. Clearly the video was taken when it was dark — atleast after 6:00. This is atleast 8 hours after the shooting.
I just find it hard to believe that they would wait that long to check out his vehicle and whatever weapons and ammunition that he had in it.
That is a good article that asks some good questions that no one has answered
I do too. Even more strange that the feds would say it was an AR 15 when clearly the rifle shown being removed was not.
Just another thing that doesn't add up.
I've been reading about this hoax stuff for about a week now and in the beginning thought it was bs, now I'm not so sure.
Anyway, I was hesitant to post anything about it here as it just seems so, I don’t, incredible.
So, thanks nachum for posting this!
Thank you for being a voice of reason and common sense on this nutty thread.
You’re welcome, but not sure it is doing any good.
I spent some time today looking at the posted videos particularly relating to the one couple -- the Phelps:
1] There is no way that Nick Phelps and Richard Sexton are the same person. Nick has a completely bald head under that cap and Richard still has a head of hair. Check it out: He takes off his cap in the video. Two different people.
2]The videomaker's proof that two people are the same person is ear comparisons. And then he shows two ears neither of which look even remotely similar and says "see they are a match" -- who is he kidding??? Is he some kind of ear-master???
3] The videomaker accuses the Phelps' of pretending to have lost children. But that's not true. They said that they had two kids in the school -- not that they lost any. And if they were the Sextons with kids down in Florida, then who is looking after their kids in Newtown while they are down there. It's nonsense.
4]Then he goes all the way in his videos to say that these two Sextons are the parents of 9 y/o Christina Taylor Green killed in the Giffords Tucson shooting. That's bunk as pictures of the Greens are available online and the Greens look nothing like the Sextons or the Phelps'.
After having spent more time than I should have on this Phelps/Sexton hoax stuff, my conclusion is that the videomaker, atleast regarding them, is the hoax.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.