Skip to comments.Is Obama's "BALANCED APPROACH" identical to "TAX AND SPEND" from the past?
Posted on 02/21/2013 8:47:36 PM PST by Graewoulf
Spendaholic Hussein Obama has conned the Left-Wing Congressional RINOS into believing that increasing taxes and agreeing to a smaller rate of increased Federal Spending is "Fair." Hence, we have "sequestration" which will reduce the rate of increase in increased Federal spending by 2.4 % which will be restored by the 2.8 % increase in worker payroll taxation, and an increased tax burden on those who pay the worker payrolls.
Will Sobber-of-The-House Boehner, Can't-Do Cantor, or Romney-RINO Ryan call out Obama's "Balanced Approach" as nothing more than the failed "Tax and Spend" policy that got the National Debt in trouble in the first place?
What say all of you?
“Tell me what you think,- - - what you really-really think, - - - “
“BALANCED APPROACH” in Rat speak means< We,Rats, will increase spending and look like we are helping the little people and you, GOP, will be required to balance it with tax increases.
Although I do find it intersting that they always talk about taxing the rich. Every time I see a Rat on TV he is surrounded by or supported by rich folks. Google, Facebook, Birkshire Hathaway, Microsoft, Bruce Springstein, Will-I_am - ‘nuff said.
If every MONTH 85 Billion Dollars are spent by Bernanke, then the economy is stimulated.
If once a YEAR 85 Billion Dollars are NOT spent by Obama, then the economy is harmed.
[ Note to self: This New-Age, negative money, Poli-Sci Math is a bitch-kitten to understand ! ]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.